Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

KT McFarland: FBI tried to set me up for 'perjury trap' in Trump-Russia probe
Fox News ^ | February 21, 2020 | By Julia Musto

Posted on 02/21/2020 8:33:16 AM PST by Hojczyk

Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland said Friday that the FBI -- under the purview of the Mueller investigation -- tried to set up her up in a "perjury trap."

Appearing on "Fox & Friends" with host Brian Kilmeade, McFarland -- who served under former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn -- explained that her life "went to hell" at the beginning of the Russia probe because investigators were convinced she was President Trump's to the Russians.

"The FBI showed up at my house unannounced. I was all by myself. They come in and I said, 'Do I need a lawyer for anything? I have never met with any Russians. I have never dealt with any Russians,'" she explained.

The agents said that while they couldn't tell her not to get a lawyer, they just wanted a "little bit of information" to help them with the investigation.

"So, I naively went along with it. The whole time they were setting me up for a perjury trap," she told Kilmeade. "Because Brian, they seized all of my files, my documents, text messages, cell phones from the period I was in government...They had control of them. They wouldn't let me have control of them."

However, the search turned out to be fruitless for all parties involved.

"They thought they could pressure me to say, 'Well, I lied in one of my early talks with you guys when I didn't have access to my information,'" she mused.

McFarland added that she was questioned about a 90-minute period spent in the president's Mar-a-Lago Club in which she didn't have any recorded correspondence or conversation in her phone records. That's when, McFarland said, they asked her whether that was the time she met with Trump to get marching orders.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: corruptdems; flynn; iran; irandeal; ktmcfarland; maralago; mcfarland; michaelflynn; mikeflynn; obamaholdovers; perjurytrap; trumpnsa; trumprussia; witchhunt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last
To: SmokingJoe

Hannity is covering his back side... so he can keep his job... he repeats it enough... to keep it covered.


41 posted on 02/21/2020 9:04:22 AM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

She said this in an interview last week, too. I’m glad she’s speaking out so everyone knows this crap goes on by the people who’re supposed to be protecting us.


42 posted on 02/21/2020 9:05:34 AM PST by MayflowerMadam ("Worry does not empty tomorrow of its sorrow; it empties today of its strength" - Corrie ten Boom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

STALL... stall it out as long as you can... and maybe the people will give up.. and then we won’t have to arrest obama and his entire administration and the clintons...


43 posted on 02/21/2020 9:06:17 AM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It would have been poetic justice for what that fake McFarland did to John Spenser. (look it up) It helped her friend Hillary get elected to the senate.


44 posted on 02/21/2020 9:06:30 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
He didn't even get a subpoena to appear before Congress. He went willingly on his own.

Yeah, Roger was literally begging to testify to set the record straight against all the lies that were being said about him at the time. They got him on semantics at best.

45 posted on 02/21/2020 9:06:39 AM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Karl Spooner
And after insisting that he would only testify in a public hearing, he went and testified behind closed doors anyway.

I honestly have no sympathy for the guy. He should be given a medal for lying to Congress, but he should rot in prison for being such a publicity-seeking retardate.

46 posted on 02/21/2020 9:11:00 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

This is one of the reasons you should NEVER talk with the FBI.


47 posted on 02/21/2020 9:12:43 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (A socalist is someone that wants everything you have except your job.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
The FBI showed up at my house unannounced. I was all by myself. They come in

First mistake. Anything the police need to say can be said on the front porch through the screen door.

and I said, 'Do I need a lawyer for anything?

Second mistake. If you even think that could be a question the answer is YES!!! Notice how the FBI weaseled on it. They won't say no, but they will never say yes.

I worked for a company that was being investigated for federal contracting problems. The investigators hit a lot of employees one night. Next morning the company made it very clear that this was a work issue - all talks should occur during work hours. Also, the company would provide lawyers to anyone who desired them and you really shouldn't talk to any investigator without a lawyer (either yours or the company's) present. We weren't told we couldn't (that might be obstruction), just that it wouldn't be wise. Those at the center hired their own lawyers rather than use the company's ones which made management at HQ very unhappy.

48 posted on 02/21/2020 9:12:47 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Democrats couldn't count a Siskel and Ebert vote, but they'll still try with those dead Chicagoans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Good advice, definitely be respectful, but if that fails just don’t talk.


49 posted on 02/21/2020 9:12:47 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie

Yep, they’re stalling while at the same time moving about 20 top stories (Alert! DING, DING, DING!) by the dopey public each day thereby creating a news cycle guaranteed to give a normal person ADD.


50 posted on 02/21/2020 9:12:58 AM PST by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Rogers highest and best use is to act as a warning to the rest of us.


51 posted on 02/21/2020 9:13:53 AM PST by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: proust
It's amazing how these arrogant, lawless FBI “agents” have no qualms, or fears whatsoever about setting up and ruining a full Lieutenant General and cabinet member. Their sheer arrogance and cavalier altitude to breaking the law is breathtaking. And none of them has paid any price whatsoever for their crimes.
52 posted on 02/21/2020 9:13:59 AM PST by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Land of the free, eh?


53 posted on 02/21/2020 9:14:10 AM PST by I want the USA back (Journalists Take Bits of Reality and Slot them into the Existing Script. -Friedman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

It’s been said before countless times but one should never, ever talk to the police or any investigative government agency. Either they arrest you or send you a list of questions they’d like you to answer.


54 posted on 02/21/2020 9:15:55 AM PST by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I don't think he lied, so we will have to disagree there. Btw, what do we do with a Judge that lies?

“He was not prosecuted, as some have complained, for standing up for the president, he was prosecuted for covering up for the president,” said Judge Amy Berman Jackson about Stone."

55 posted on 02/21/2020 9:17:47 AM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

Fox headline .. Trump dismisses reports of Russia meddling.. how about more than that... how about calling he media to task... show your evidence.... how about telling the reporters who are saying this over and over.. all day.. every day... how about giving them the treatment.... just belittle them over and over... lower their status... make fools of them... the whole GOP needs to step in and make noise...
be nice and you will lose...go after them!!!!


56 posted on 02/21/2020 9:19:19 AM PST by frnewsjunkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

If you refuse to cooperate and/or insist on your lawyer being present, could you lose your security clearance? A refusal can be spun by Deep State to look like she’s got something to hide.

Everyone knows better now, but back then I can’t blame for refusing to believe the worst.


57 posted on 02/21/2020 9:19:27 AM PST by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Stone was never in the administration in any form. He pushed himself as a surrogate. Stone is as Trump said, a “colorful” character. I do not agree with what was done to Stone and I am not a fan of Roger Stone. I think he loved to be the center of attention, interject himself into events, and frankly he loved to stir the pot - deliberately and provocatively.

The person MOST responsible for his conviction is Roger Stone. He relished the limelight and looking like he was some kind of insider with information that nobody else had. He did not help Trump during the campaign, he and others around him muddied the waters and I said way back then that Stone needed to stay out of it and I wished he would stay off of television as he came across as some kind of clinger who promoted himself.

With all that said, what was done to him does not represent justice. It was deliberate and underhanded. The entire investigation was a fraud, the issues with the jury foreperson and judge are troubling, and the sentence is ridiculous. It is infuriating that the big investigation without a proper predicate was treated far more seriously and severely than other investigations with legitimate probable cause of a crime.

Trump should pardon him, but I think he is correct in allowing the situation to play itself out.


58 posted on 02/21/2020 9:19:53 AM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: frnewsjunkie

Fox news is like the Republican party; there’s a few decent ones but most are trash. Yes, identify them, mock them and insist they produce evidence to support their phony ALERTS!!!


59 posted on 02/21/2020 9:22:26 AM PST by JonPreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Do they even have editors at Fox News? tried to set up her up That is just one of the examples.


60 posted on 02/21/2020 9:23:33 AM PST by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-133 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson