Link not working for me. By what authority does Roberts disallow the question. There is no law making Ciaramella’s name unspeakable.
Does Roberts know that the right to face one’s accuser is recognized in the Magna Carta and the US Constitution?
Chief Justice John Roberts - the GW Bush gift that keeps on giving....
Good luck with it.
Someone accusing a person of committing a crime has no right to anonymity.
This is a trial and whistle-blower protections don’t apply. The most valuable right is to confront one’s accuser.
The concept of an anonymous whistle blower is contrary to our Constitution that guarantees the right for someone to face his accuser.
Yeah... this whole impeachment thingy is all about “getting to the truth”...
I watched the Q&A yesterday and I didn’t see when this happened.
Was Paul recognized? Was his question brought down to Roberts? Did Roberts say anything? Did he do anything with the question card?
The better approach is to get the ID of the whistleblower directly — either by making the complaint public or by questioning IG Michael Atkinson about it.
Meanwhile the GOP has to beg AG Barr to expose Horowitz’ shenanigans — which of course he won’t.
Does anyone expect anything other than jack boots vs patriots in the near future?
Roberts is owned by the Deep State and will do what he can to bias the process IMO.
The whistleblower is blowing more than whistles.
and Paul may force the issue>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
As Paul should. The whistleblower is not protected by the Whitsleblower statute or by security directives of the executive branch.
Roberts can only protect the whistleblower by resorting to shadows and penumbras of law. And if he does, Roberts will live in infamy and place the administration of justice into disrepute.
To use and overworked Dem balking point:
” No one is above the law.”
If the president is not, neither is Ciaramela.
Its time to bust this money laundering Dem/Soros banking grand scadal wide open by getting at the whistleblower, who had organized it all.HUnter Biden was one of several bagmen.Nothing like the Obama redistribution of wealth scheme, eh?
Paul is a right as rain on this.Shine the light of day on it on behalf of the People.
Does it really matter at this point? If the GOP has the votes to end this thing, and the name is known anyway, this just looks like Senator Paul grinding an ax. Sure, the idea that this scumbag can stay as an anon is ridiculous, but the entire thing has been a joke/hoax.
Since it’s Super Bowl week: if you are about to take a knee to win the game, are you still going to complain too hard about the crappy holding call in the 2nd quarter?
I don’t get it. Anyone can accuse a POTUS of anything, instigate an impeachment and the POTUS and people are not allowed to know who the accuser is? WTF!
Yesterday, I thought it was telling when several DEMS yesterday, quite a few times, mentioned the Chief Justice as a decider into arguments. Do they know they have him in the bag?
Somebody should be asking where the transcript of the 18th witness is.
Roberts is a bigger assclown than the dead lady still on the court.
I will receive much satisfaction when the traitorous Roberts bangs the final gavel on Trump’s aquittal or whatever it’s called.
I hope Justice Thomas laughs in his face when he returns to the SC.
What ever happened to being able to face your accuser? Isn’t that what the 6th Amendment is about? I read the text of the Amendment and find that the first few words outline the right is protected for criminal prosecutions. Is this trial considered such?