Skip to comments.
Pelosi Signals An End To Her Hold On Articles Of Impeachment; Expects to Release It to Senate 'Soon'
NPR ^
| Dierdre Walsh and Kelsey Snell
Posted on 01/09/2020 9:52:51 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
To: gibsonguy
61
posted on
01/09/2020 5:18:01 PM PST
by
Eddie01
To: SeekAndFind
Mitch to Nancy: “I am the Senate!”
62
posted on
01/09/2020 5:28:53 PM PST
by
EdnaMode
To: dragnet2
"Pelosi couldnt get any mileage out of her little ploy. She ran this thing until it ran out of gas. What a loser."When she realized the only vote she had in the Senate was Mike Lee, well, I'm surprised she didn't just quit on the spot.
63
posted on
01/09/2020 6:00:42 PM PST
by
StAnDeliver
(CNN's Dana B: "Show of hands: Coverage for undocumented immigrants?" ***all Democrat hands raised***)
To: VideoDoctor
I suspicion this is just more B.S. from Pelosi
I believe she KNOWS if she releases this to the Senate it’s either “going nowhere”.. or could result in the Senate holding a trial and as Trump has already stated, “I want to see witnesses like Joe and Hunter Biden, Adam Schiff, etc called to testify.
Releasing the impeachment articles results in the Dimms “no longer” having any direct control over the impeachment process and Nutso Nancy fears that most of all.
My suspicion is that is not correct. Bickering about process has always be in the Dems impeachment game plan. I expect the House will send its garbage to the Senate around SOTU time.
64
posted on
01/09/2020 6:06:08 PM PST
by
lodi90
To: lodi90
My suspicion is that is not correct. Time will tell who is right.
To: SeekAndFind
All we want to know is what are the rules Sorry Nancy, you'll have to pass them along to the senate to see what's in store for you ... just like Obamacare.
66
posted on
01/09/2020 9:42:36 PM PST
by
Tellurian
(DemocRats would smugly tell even God "you didn't build that".)
To: MRadtke
--
Evidence? Did the House stupidly vote to impeach a president WITHOUT EVIDENCE? --
There is a ton of evidence. All the behind closed doors transcripts plus the public hearings plus the call record itself.
A majority of the House found that the evidnece it had justifies removing POTUS from office. It resolved to present that finding to the Senate.
The problem the majority of the House has is that its reasoning in reaching the conclusion is founded on bad faith leaps and fictional law.
But regardless, it has plenty of evidence, and it can continue the fishing expedition - that process is totally independent of impeachment trial.
67
posted on
01/09/2020 9:51:38 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: SeekAndFind
68
posted on
01/09/2020 10:25:04 PM PST
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: goldstategop
None of her business! House has NO role in trying impeachments. She can go fly a kite.
Partner, u hit a grand slam homerun with that statement.
The Impeachment papers will be tossed out by McConJob and he better do this.
We all know that "Schiff for Brains" was the Judge, Jury and Executioner. "Schiff for Brains" is a complete joke and we all know this.
Nancy Pelousy will be eighty years old pretty soon and she has the beginning of Dementia and Alzheimer's and probably why "Nancy Pelousy has a huge problem in drinking too much.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson