Skip to comments.
Pelosi Signals An End To Her Hold On Articles Of Impeachment; Expects to Release It to Senate 'Soon'
NPR ^
| Dierdre Walsh and Kelsey Snell
Posted on 01/09/2020 9:52:51 AM PST by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: All
Pelosi says she wants more information on the rules.
"It doesn't mean we have to agree to or like the rules. We just want to know what they are." How stupid are they? "Genius Nanzi" and the Democraps dont even know? The Dem-things are one big joke.
The Senate is using the same rules adopted unanimously by Democrats for Clinton's impeachment.
21
posted on
01/09/2020 10:06:21 AM PST
by
Liz
(Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: MayflowerMadam
........I like it.........
22
posted on
01/09/2020 10:07:25 AM PST
by
Liz
(Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: All
QUOTING NANZI'S WINGMAN SEN SCHUMER: "She's doing a good job. "
She's holding onto the articles of impeachment "until she gets witnesses and evidence." Evidence? Did the House stupidly vote to impeach a president WITHOUT EVIDENCE?
23
posted on
01/09/2020 10:09:16 AM PST
by
Liz
(Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.)
To: Liz
Evidence? Did the House stupidly vote to impeach a president WITHOUT EVIDENCE?Rats, caught again.
24
posted on
01/09/2020 10:11:34 AM PST
by
1Old Pro
To: SeekAndFind
Blink biatch! How does in feel to get pwned by the Turtle?
25
posted on
01/09/2020 10:17:12 AM PST
by
Seruzawa
(TANSTAAFL!)
To: z3n
People on FR can spin some “plot” out of their damn milk going bad.
Since there aren’t going to ba any, why the hell would they need to tamper with anything?
To: SeekAndFind
The beatings will continue until moral improves.
27
posted on
01/09/2020 10:19:39 AM PST
by
VTenigma
(The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
To: 1Old Pro
As for documents, getting them investigated and filed was the job of the House.
Its supposed to produce them and witnessed for trial. Democrat is have NONE.
Sucks to be them.
28
posted on
01/09/2020 10:21:59 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: SeekAndFind
29
posted on
01/09/2020 10:25:30 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Why the hell isn't Hillary Rodham Clinton in prison yet?)
To: VanDeKoik
Since there arent going to ba any, why the hell would they need to tamper with anything?
~~~
Are you sure there wont be any witnesses?
McConnell has said that there will be no witnesses for the start of the trial, but that there is a chance that they will call a vote on it later.
... and I have no doubt in my mind at all that these guys wouldn’t attempt to tamper with possible witnesses. Or witness intimidation, or even work to destroy or obfuscate evidence. Particularly Schiff, who had no problem working with a “whistleblower”. Oh wait, that was his staff. Like that makes it all better.
People forget that Clinton was impeached for witness tampering. The media focused on the sleeze aspects of the whole thing in order to muddy it up, or at most the perjury part.
30
posted on
01/09/2020 10:27:43 AM PST
by
z3n
To: ClearCase_guy
Yep - tweeted that to her and asked if it was too hard to understand...
31
posted on
01/09/2020 10:28:21 AM PST
by
trebb
(Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
To: SeekAndFind
To: SeekAndFind
The House approved the two articles... largely along party lines on Dec. 18. If it had been two Republicans who crossed over to vote with Democrats, the headline would have been "The House approved the two articles... largely along party lines with two Republicans joining Democrats on Dec. 18."
-PJ
33
posted on
01/09/2020 10:32:47 AM PST
by
Political Junkie Too
(Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
To: SeekAndFind
She blinked at the 12th deadline but it does not matter as the case will still get dismissed.
34
posted on
01/09/2020 10:33:58 AM PST
by
DarthVader
(Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
To: SeekAndFind
Correct me if I am wrong, but I dont recall the word ‘I’ being anywhere within the constitution. Arrest Pelosi immediaty on charges of treason and conspiracy to commit voter fraud.
35
posted on
01/09/2020 10:35:09 AM PST
by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
To: SeekAndFind
Nothing really new to report here. Same old sh*t so just move along. Nothing to see here.
36
posted on
01/09/2020 10:42:07 AM PST
by
Ron H.
(Gab.com)
To: ClearCase_guy
Same rules that the House followed... oh wait, never mind.
37
posted on
01/09/2020 10:49:25 AM PST
by
dhs12345
To: z3n
Yet another check on the government. Good news that the Republicans control the Senate.
38
posted on
01/09/2020 10:52:13 AM PST
by
dhs12345
To: SeekAndFind
No she’s not, this buys her more time, she has no plans to release them. I say up/down vote in 20 minutes and get er’ done ...
39
posted on
01/09/2020 10:56:30 AM PST
by
GulfMan
To: SeekAndFind
Wow, there's actually gonna be a defense this time?
Peelousy aint gonna like that one bit.
40
posted on
01/09/2020 10:59:17 AM PST
by
rawcatslyentist
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfuAJcWl6DE Kill a Commie for Mommie)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson