Posted on 12/25/2019 6:37:11 PM PST by robowombat
UN demands that British army send more women for defense against jihad in Mali
DEC 25, 2019 11:00 AM BY CHRISTINE DOUGLASS-WILLIAMS
“The United Nations has placed strict gender quotas on a British Army peacekeeping deployment to Mali in west Africa, demanding more females are sent under the auspices of a special bureaucratic directive….The call for more female UK soldiers to be included is part of a wider set of directives drafted by the U.N. that mandates strict quotas for female personnel in the name of equal opportunity.”
The UN is forcing the issue of more women in the British army to fight African jihadis under the disguise of gender equality. The mission has been described as “the most dangerous mission for British forces since Afghanistan.” What is the UN really up to, particularly given its alliance with the Organization Islamic Cooperation, which aims to subvert the Houses of War (infidel countries)?
Given the brutality of this war, combined with how normative Islam views infidel enemy women (inferiors and to be taken as sex slaves), of which the UN is well aware, this implies a nefarious agenda.
The UN has never attempted to impose gender equality across the board, including in Islamic states. Its “strict gender quotas on a British Army peacekeeping deployment to Mali in west Africa, demanding more females are sent under the auspices of a special bureaucratic directive” is highly questionable.
“U.N. Imposes Strict Gender Quotas on British Army for Africa Jihadi Fight,” by Simon Kent, Breitbart, December 22, 2019:
The United Nations has placed strict gender quotas on a British Army peacekeeping deployment to Mali in west Africa, demanding more females are sent under the auspices of a special bureaucratic directive.
At least 250 soldiers are expected to join the U.N. peacekeeping force helping France to contain the deadly Islamist jihadi threat in the disputed Sahel region, the Daily Express reports.
The call for more female UK soldiers to be included is part of a wider set of directives drafted by the U.N. that mandates strict quotas for female personnel in the name of equal opportunity.
Under Uniformed Gender Parity Strategy targets, 15 percent of military observers and staff officers must be women by next year, while the figure for female “boots on the ground” is 7.5 percent.
It means the British Army will have to field at least 18 female soldiers in order to comply during the Mali deployment.
Senior planners involved with preparing for the mission expressed their fury.
“The British Army embraces gender equality. We feel it’s the right thing, and a good thing,” one senior officer told the newspaper.
“But equality cuts both ways. This is about our ability, as planners, to choose the most appropriate soldiers for the task at hand, be they men or women.
“It’s true that we are joining a U.N. peacekeeping operation, and not France’s parallel mission. However, we anticipate that this will be a highly kinetic operation.”
The officer questioned whether bureaucrats sitting in their offices in the U.N. building in New York rather than being out in the field have any notion of the absurdity of the request.
“Frankly, to be forced to comply with a tick-boxing request which doesn’t address the immediate realities of the challenges we face is ludicrous.”
---------------------------------------------------------------
Um, the UN has no authority over how the UK army conducts itself.
President Trump should make this his #3 campaign issue...right after:
1. Build the Wall
2. Lock up the Coup conspirators
3. U.S. out of the UN, UN out of the U.S.
Are they sure Clinton and Hunter Biden didn't cause all that?
That oughta do it.
Paging Cleavon Little. Please pick up the white courtesy phone.
L
All part of the UN’s plan of making the jihadis laugh themselves to death.
F_CK THE UN!
Drag those lowlife bastards out of their New York offices and send the to Mali, let the UNf#ck the situation in Mali.
Sounds fair.
The UN was started by Algir Hiss and some other commies. So it’s not surprising that it wants to mess up the West.
And in 2005...
“United Nations – More than 2,400 businesses, including scores of international shell companies and major blue-chip European firms such as Siemens and DaimlerChrysler, paid nearly $1.8 billion in illegal kickbacks to the former Iraqi government through the U.N.’s Oil-For-Food Program...”
-Denver Post 2005
Trust the UN as you would trust any leftist con-man.
Of course it’s not a hoax.
The UN is shelling out too much money for Peacekeeper babies.
Simple...just send some trannies...
We know the homosexuals who like to dress like females are anxious to fight and die for their country...Bradley Manning told us so...
well, the solution is apparent to those that will look.
A full platoon of transgender infantry should be sent to Mali. The policy of declared trans gender shall be announced and followed.
“President Trump should make this his #3 campaign issue...right after:
1. Build the Wall
2. Lock up the Coup conspirators
3. U.S. out of the UN, UN out of the U.S.”
I’m for that 1,000 %.
Dear Britain, tell them to bugger off.
They must need some more nice western women to rape and abuse.
Excellent idea!
Excellent idea!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.