Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Check Them Out: The U.S. Army's Upgraded M-1A2C Abrams Are Coming
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/check-them-out-us-armys-upgraded-m-1a2c-abrams-are-coming-974 ^ | November 19, 2019 | David Axe

Posted on 11/19/2019 6:49:44 AM PST by Lowell1775

The U.S. Army’s newest tank in the summer of 2019 should enter service with the first large unit to use the type.

The Army in late 2017 accepted the very first M-1A2C Abrams tanks. Nearly two years later the service has enough of the new vehicles to equip an entire brigade.

“We’re in the throes of getting that together,” Hank Kennedy, a manager at General Dynamics’ tank plant in Lima Ohio, told Lima News.

The “first brigade is critical because we need to get [them] into the soldiers’ hands so they can get trained on it and everything else,” Kennedy said.

A U.S. Army armored brigade typically operates around 100 tanks. The Army has 16 armored brigades as part of a total force of 58 combat brigades.

The M-1A2C is the latest variant of Abrams to enter production. Congress in 2019 gave the Army $1.5 billion to buy 135 M-1s from General Dynamics, extending a program that began in the 1970s.

The Army’s budget proposal for 2020 asks for 174 new and upgraded tanks.

The new M-1A2C Abrams boasts new active and passive protection that could help to protect it from the latest enemy weaponry. The most obvious new features of the M-1A2C are the vehicle's Trophy active-protection systems and an additional slab of armor on the front of its turret.

Trophy uses a radar to detect incoming missiles and rockets then fires tiny projectiles to intercept the munitions. The Army also is back-fitting Trophy to some older M-1 models.

The first M-1 entered service with the Army in 1980. The original M-1 packed a 105-millimeter gun. The Army bought 3,300 of them. In 1984 the Army added thicker armor to a batch of new M-1s and called these 900 tanks M-1IPs. The U.S. military no longer uses these early M-1s.

A major upgrade in 1986 added a new 120-millimeter gun. This is the M-1A1. The Army and Marines bought 5,200 copies through 1992. Roughly a thousand M-1A1s still are in service with the Marines and Army National Guard. Another 3,000 or so are in storage.

There are a bewildering number of subvariants of the M-1A1, each boasting incremental improvements in drive-train, armor and electronics. The latest upgrade, the M-1A1SA, has a factory-fresh engine, digital electronics and a top-secret armor blend that includes a thin layer of uranium.

The Army plans to retire all M-1A1SAs by 2025.

The M-1A2 appeared in 1992. It’s pretty much a new tank, with better armor than the basic M-1A1 plus a new internal layout and fresh sensors that together allow the gunner and the commander independently to search for targets.

The Army has acquired around 1,500 M-1A2s and converted most of them to the System Enhancement Package Version 2 standard. The M-1A2SEPv2, which General Dynamics describes as a "digital tank," features high-end computers, a remotely-operated machine gun on the turret and a dozen batteries that allow the tank quietly to operate its sensors without turning on its engine.

The M-1A2C in essence is a better-protected M-1A2SEPv2 that's also easier to upgrade. In addition to Trophy and more armor, the new tank boasts more electrical power, better diagnostic systems and a data-link that's compatible with programmable ammunition types that are in development.

"The Abrams M-1A2C can host any mature technology the Army deems operationally relevant," the Army stated.

The latest version of the M-1 arguably is the best tank in the world. For now.

Russia and China both are developing new fighting vehicles. Russia's high-tech Armata tank has run into development problems. China successfully has fielded hundreds of new Type 99A tanks that roughly are similar to mid-generation, digital M-1s.

But China has struggled to adapt old-style doctrine to its new armor. In early 2019, the Chinese army's 81st Group Army, riding in Type 99As, lost a mock battle during a war game in Mongolia, Global Times reported, citing the state-run CCTV television news network.

"We rushed with the Type 99A too close to the frontline, which did not optimize the use of the tank's combat capability," CCTV quoted Xu Chengbiao, a battalion commander in the brigade, as saying.

"We only studied the capabilities of older tanks, but have not completely understood new ones," Zhao Jianxin, another battalion commander, reportedly told CCTV.

Anticipating the day when Russia resumes modernizing its tank corps and China figures out how to use its own new fighting vehicles, the U.S. Army already is planning a new M-1 variant to follow the M-1A2C.

The "cornerstone technology" of the M-1A2D is a new infrared sensor, according to the Army. The newest Abrams will also sport a new laser range-finder and will be compatible with artificial intelligence that could make the tank more autonomous, the Army stated.

The plant in Lima, the only factory in the United States that builds tanks, nearly is doubling its workforce in anticipation of large orders for new tanks.

Kennedy told Lima News the tank plant’s workforce has grown from around 500 to more than 600 since a hiring spree started in late 2018. He said he expects the workforce to expand to 700 by the end of 2019 and exceed 900 in 2020.

David Axe serves as Defense Editor of the National Interest. He is the author of the graphic novels War Fix, War Is Boring and Machete Squad. This article first appeared earlier this year.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: amry; defense; oh; tanks; treadhead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last
To: KobraKai

And the 2020 Corvette is just a 1953 model.


21 posted on 11/19/2019 7:32:53 AM PST by Delta 21 (Be strong & prosper, be weak & die! Stay true.... ~~ Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775; FreedomPoster; Delta 21; mostly cajun; archy; Gringo1; Matthew James; Fred Mertz; ...
FREEPER TREADHEAD PING

ON THE WAY !

Keeper of the Tread Head Ping List: (Just a bunch of tankers) Lemme know if you want on/off the list.


22 posted on 11/19/2019 7:33:02 AM PST by Delta 21 (Be strong & prosper, be weak & die! Stay true.... ~~ Donald J. Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wizdum

Kinetic energy rounds can defeat it. Also, Russia/India etal coming out with new ATGMs and RPGs soon.


23 posted on 11/19/2019 7:34:08 AM PST by donozark (Free Roger Stone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Didn’t turn out so well in Terminator, either.


24 posted on 11/19/2019 7:34:49 AM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775
The Army has acquired around 1,500 M-1A2s and converted most of them to the System Enhancement Package Version 2 standard. The M-1A2SEPv2, which General Dynamics describes as a "digital tank," features high-end computers, a remotely-operated machine gun on the turret and a dozen batteries that allow the tank quietly to operate its sensors without turning on its engine.

The M-1A2C in essence is a better-protected M-1A2SEPv2 that's also easier to upgrade. In addition to Trophy and more armor, the new tank boasts more electrical power, better diagnostic systems and a data-link that's compatible with programmable ammunition types that are in development.

Learn2code


25 posted on 11/19/2019 7:38:57 AM PST by Pollard (If you don't understand what I typed, you haven't read the classics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

>>I hear that you can buy them at gun shows.

And without a background check...


26 posted on 11/19/2019 7:41:32 AM PST by vikingd00d (chown -R us ~you/base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775
The Brief Bolo History...
The General Motors Bolo Mark I, Model B, was little more than an upgrade of the Abrams/Leopard/Challenger/LeClerc/T-80-era main battle tank of the final years of the Soviet-American Cold War. (At the time the first Bolo was authorized, GM decided that there would never be a "Model A" or a "Model T", on the basis that the Ford Motor Company had permanently preempted those designations>) Equipped with a high-velocity main gun capable of defeating the newest Chobham-type composite armors at virtually any battle range and with a four-man crew, the Mark I was an essentially conventional if very heavy (150 metric tons) and fast (80 kph road speed) tank in direct line of descent from World War I's "Mother" via the Renault, PzKpf IV, T-34, Sherman, Panther, Tiger, Patton, T-54, M-60, Chieftain, T-72, and Abrams.

http://www.crayven.net/warhawk/bolo/briefhistory.html

27 posted on 11/19/2019 7:42:16 AM PST by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Gun shows? You can order one on the internet and have it delivered to your house with no background check. Why bother with the gun show loophole?


28 posted on 11/19/2019 7:47:20 AM PST by real saxophonist (Yeah, well, y'know that's just like, uh... your opinion, man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

For those who don’t know, the military procurement system hit it out of the park with the M1.

It is designed to be up-gradable with many components being plug and play.

Need an upgraded gizmo? Pull out the old one and just slide the new one in it’s place.

Bolt on external reactive armor getting antiquated? Slap on the new and improved model and have a new 2LT check it with a ball-peen to search for dead spots.


29 posted on 11/19/2019 7:47:58 AM PST by Gamecock (Time is short Eternity is long It is reasonable that this short life be lived in light of eternity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt
Have you read Ghost Fleet by Singer?
30 posted on 11/19/2019 7:48:43 AM PST by sauropod (I am His and He is mine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

Designed in 1970’s and still the MBT for the Army. With refits and upgrades, that is a 50 year old design. Impressive. Kinda like the B-52 for the Army.


31 posted on 11/19/2019 7:48:53 AM PST by taxcontrol (Stupid should hurt - dad's wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775
Saw my first M1 back in 1980 - I was building engines and they trucked one to the plant and put on a show at the adjacent airfield.
1500 SHP is nothing to sneeze at.
32 posted on 11/19/2019 7:51:37 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("I will now proceed to entangle the entire area".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Just went there with Ad-Block plus on my browser, and it showed 16 blocked ads while I was there.


33 posted on 11/19/2019 7:52:49 AM PST by Ed Condon (subliminal messages here in invisible ink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CondorFlight
I think we need to start thinking about drone (unmanned) tanks, controlled from miles away (or even continents away)…

Read "Gottlos" by Colin Kapp. It's not as easy as you think. The story is fiction, but the problem is real.
34 posted on 11/19/2019 7:54:31 AM PST by Phlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: donozark

Best to read the article before posting. That is addressed


35 posted on 11/19/2019 7:59:26 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KobraKai

Best to read the article before posting.

US has always stretched the life span of tanks.

The M60 we upgraded 3 or 4 times before we switch to the Abrahams


36 posted on 11/19/2019 8:01:14 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: donozark

False

READ the article. Don’t just cling to an ignorance based opinion


37 posted on 11/19/2019 8:02:25 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

The tech in the Sci Fiction stories of my youth are starting to be built into real tanks.

Man am I getting old


38 posted on 11/19/2019 8:03:32 AM PST by MNJohnnie (They would have to abandon leftism to achieve sanity. Freeper Olog-hai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

Ahh … the next step in development of the Continental Siege Unit. Are they self-aware yet?


39 posted on 11/19/2019 8:05:00 AM PST by NorthMountain (... the right of the peopIe to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lowell1775

Tanks are ok in Europe and in the desert. They are a bit heavy for Third World bridges.

A tank is only useful if it can get to where the fighting is. We may need to look at much lighter, unmanned vehicles that can fit in narrow places, go over weak bridges, and can be deployed in swarms.


40 posted on 11/19/2019 8:09:24 AM PST by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson