Posted on 10/04/2019 10:43:15 PM PDT by rintintin
The upcoming twelve-candidate Democratic presidential primary debate is probably going to be another mess, but one highlight will be the return of Tulsi Gabbard to the stage — good news not just for Michael Brendan Dougherty, but for everyone who wants to see an actual debate. In a series of prime-time meetings that have included a lot of repetitive platitudes and all-too-convenient anecdotes about an American everyman that candidates met on the trail, one of the few genuine bits of drama comes from the question of who Gabbard will go after and why.
The Hawaii congresswoman’s debate performances haven’t done much to break her out of the asterisk category, but boy, can she dissect an opponent’s record in a devastating fashion. You could argue that Gabbard more than anyone else triggered the slide of Kamala Harris since the second debate.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
Gabbard’s not any better than the rest of the clown show. She just wraps herself in the flag.
And since that's my #1 issue, that's why I like 'em both.
+1
Stupid as sin. But definitely not guilty.
+1000
But most do not have the depth of knowledge you have, alas!
You're missing the point. Tulsi is not radical Left. Her very presence on the stage splits the Democrats, between moderates and radicals.
Why she is being worshiped by many on this forum, I do not know. What I do know is, that at the end of the day she is still a Democrat and she will do as Democrats do.
No more presidents from Hawaii.
The first one was horrible.
The only reason to be pleased about Gabbard’s participation is that she will sow dissention in the foreign policy debate.
Other than that, she is just as delusional as the rest of the insane midgets.
I'd tune in to see that also.
Do I want Tulsi to be the next president? No. But it is a HELL NO for anybody else on the D side.
Thank you.
She’s a democRAT, therfore she’s a lefist.
Leftists lie. All the time. About everything.
Even when they’re talking about imposing some form of tyranny, they’re lying by omission. What they really plan to do is worse than what they’re saying.
“The Lone Good News About the Upcoming Debate: Gabbard Will Be Back on Stage”
What’s the good news? She’s a democRAT and that says it all. I will admit to her being the best looking on the stage.
“I’ll be looking forward to her sinking her claws into Lizzy Warren.”
That indeed might make the idiotfest watchable.
Ever hear of a bizarre collective creature known as a Rat King? It's a collection of RATs stuck together by their tails that has to move as one. I can't say I'm anything close to worshiping her, but it is nice to see a Rat that has got her tail free of the collective mob.
Bernie will be there, as long as he can come like this:
First, I doubt she will be in it at the end.
Second, the only reason she is in it at all is because she is a radical liberal. If she preaches common sense on such things as border security, that doesn't mean she believes it. As a liberal Democrat she knows without importing many many poor uneducated people and making them voters, the Democratic Party is moribund.
She’s the definition of “good from far. Far from good.”
She’s totally untrustworthy. But then what democrat is?
She sold out when it matters—she is now part of the Trump impeachment lynch mob.
She is just as bat $hit leftist as the rest of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.