Posted on 07/25/2019 9:09:37 AM PDT by jazusamo
From the beginning of the Left's attempt to destroy the Trump candidacy, then presidency, it was Adam Schiff who was the most consumed by the fabricated hoax that Trump had colluded with Russia to win the election. He believed every morsel of disinformation that was carefully leaked by the collaborators at the FBI, DOJ, CIA, DNC and the Clinton gang. Once their fake news was leaked, they could and did use those articles as evidence against the President.
They used those columns of fabricated tales of Trump's collusion to get FISA warrants to spy on every person who was part of the campaign. They spied, they set-up innocent persons like Papadopoulos in service of constructing a complex but false narrative that would round out their coup.
For these past two-years plus, it has been Schiff who has had his fingers in his ears, who refused to acknowledge the volumes of information that have been revealed, has clearly not read any of the books published that are chock full of the facts. In short, it has been Schiff who was obsessed with taking Trump down and out and it is Schiff who has the most egg on his face following the Mueller hearings. His ridiculous conclusion to his committee's two hours was clearly written before either hearing, and so was in contradiction to what had taken place with every word.
In fact, Schiff may be the only member of Congress ever caught on tape trying hard to extract dirt in the form of nude pictures of Trump from two Russian comics who called him and offered the “kompromat.” For two years he has appeared on numerous cable not-news programs and stated that he absolutely had solid evidence of Trump's collusion with Russia to win the election and to do Putin's bidding.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
It would be interesting to see if Schiff’s eyes would finally pop out of his head when he reached the end of the rope at his execution.
Schiff is used to having things sprayed on his face.
Don’t feel to bad, I am Stuck with Andre Carson.
Ask Schiff how old she was, if you see him or know someone who will.
Dunno. For me, it’s a tough call between Schitt and Nadless.
Why did he vote FOR the sharia fore-runner Harris Amendment to the idiotic anti-lynching bill?
I ain’t just pickin’ on him. I’m in the middle of a war with MY ass-wipe GOP rep. Mooney over the same thing!
Politics.
Sometimes politicians, on BOTH SIDES, will vote FOR or AGAINST an amendment that they know will KILL a bill it’s being attached to............
They look like they are at a wake.
Schiff for brains had a lot of competition, though. Thanks jazusamo.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/schiffforbrains/index
Yeah...
I was against it before I was for it.
I was for it before I was against it.
I seem to have heard something like that somewhere before.
PS, the resolution (H. Res 183) passed, and now the camel’s nose is under the tent. The US Government is now recognizing the “CRIME” of islamophobia how ever it may be described.
They just keep chipping away and either our pols are too stupid to see what’s happening, they do not care, or they want it!
p
Is he another dunderhead?
What a HUMBUG!
“....how does he maintain a security clearance ......”
For the 9,999th time he gets a clearance by virtual of being elected to Congress! You get elected you’re vetted!
That’s why character matters in who you vote for.
Though I imagine his district is fine with his anti-American rantings!
Ah... then how did Sen. Patrick Leahy lose his security clearance due to intel leaks?
He resigned because of the bad press.
“...
The topic of security clearance for elected officials has long been a complex one. Members of congress – even those in sensitive committee positions – do not receive or obtain security clearances in the same way that a member of the public would go about obtaining a security clearance based on job or military requirement.
Through the process of election and selection to a seat in the House of Representatives or Senate comes with it a certain public seal of access to information of a sensitive nature. (Few voters likely think about this when they vote, but it’s a key reason trustworthiness often plays a major role in politicking). Both the House and Senate do have security offices and staff – with the responsibility for overseeing access to classified information, among other things.
..................”
https://news.clearancejobs.com/2012/05/16/do-members-of-congress-have-security-clearances/
https://www.govloop.com/community/blog/do-members-of-congress-have-security-clearances/
“.................
House members, beginning with the 104th Congress, do have to take a secrecy oath. Members of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence – the committee with oversight over intelligence agencies including the CIA and NSA – have a separate oath, commensurate with their unique access to sensitive information. Again, these oaths take the way of a public pledge, vice the arduous security-clearance process, complete with SF86, undertaken by the average
..................”
They do, do a pinky swear!
These guys aren’t about to let themselves have a normal security clearance investigation occur. Any illegal activity has to be reported. No professional politician will put himself/herself at that risk!
Interesting; informative. I did not know but should have guessed - Congress is never subject to the laws binding the rest of us.
So, then, let me repeat my earlier question: Why don't the Repubs denounce this creepy criminal? It is obvious that Schiff and Nadler have been hiding behind Congressional protection and privilege in order to pour out scurrilous lies that Donald Trump is a traitor and a puppet of Putin who has committed innumerable crimes. When will POTUS launch his counter attack against these criminals?
Abraham Lincoln actually deported a troublesome Congressman to Canada... perhaps those were the days. [:^/
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.