Posted on 07/24/2019 5:39:29 AM PDT by nikos1121
Need a master class on the Mueller report before Robert Mueller testifies before Congress? Join PBS NewsHour correspondent and producer William Brangham, senior broadcast producer Mike Melia and digital politics editor and senior writer Daniel Bush on July 24 as they answer questions and walk viewers through the Russia investigation and Mueller's findings. The livestream kicks off at 7:40 a.m. EDT with a breakdown of the major findings and moments from Mueller's report. Between deep dives on parts of the report, your hosts will answer select questions from the live chat and social media.
To ask a question, use our live chat window to the right or tweet us @NewsHour.
Stay tuned for PBS NewsHour’s ongoing coverage of Mueller's testimony, which begins at 8:30 a.m. in a House Judiciary Committee hearing, and continues at noon with a House Intelligence committee hearing.
And Juan does the normal Dem talking points. Even Chrissy Wallace starts with not going well for Dems
My mute’s on again!
All this talk about “wanting to fire Mueller”. MUELLER WASN’T Fired. The Dems are spending 80% of this hearing trying to prove ATTEMPTED obstruction of justice??
The Dems keep harping on the President wanting Mueller fired. Why does no Republican point out that he was not fired even though it is specifically the Presidents prerogative to in fact fire the whole DOJ if he wished?
—
yes!!!!!
His legacy will be a fumbling partisan, nothing more, nothing less.
People have mentioned that he has cognitive issues. It’s pretty clear that his elevator doesn’t go to the top floor.
PBS news gal says, “Mueller mumbles his answers” and “appears to be unfamiliar with “parts” of the report”, lol.
Under our system of American jurisprudence, Trump is entirely justified in saying no obstruction. The Mueller report, however, blatantly ignores key component of American jurisprudence: innocent until proven guilty. The Mueller report could not prove guilt or it would have so stated.
It is up to the courts to establish guilt. Mueller’s report was never cross-examined.
“I wouldn’t be surprised if he ends up ill today. His blood pressure must be over the top.”
Has anyone asked him yet if he wrote the report?
Watching this, I am now of the opinion that it would be good for Trump for the house to impeach him.
It will make the dems look so bad it will be noticeable by nearly everyone.
So go ahead.
Impeach.
Ate they have yet?
I’ve believed for a while that there are big things in his future.
Looks like Kerry’s long lost twin.
It's sad, he was nothing but the name on the door. I imagine he slept right thru the past two years after he got partisan Dems to run his investigation.
*blinks twice*
You said that?
I might have to re-think.
That puts the Democrats in a conflicting position in that if they accuse the Republicans of “berating an old man”, then they would also have to consider the possibility that Mueller is cognitively compromised and for how long. They could call the entire investigation into question because it was possibly being lead by someone who was not competent.
Correction: Are they back yet?
I believe that the spin coming out of this testimony will be "How awful that the mean Republicans attacked an obviously frail old man"
It's all they have.
No meal.
Couldn’t understand a question. Richmond moved to next question.
Shame on Nadler for putting this poor old man through this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.