Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold!.
Real Donald Trump Twitter ^ | June 2, 2019 | President Trump

Posted on 06/02/2019 6:46:30 AM PDT by SMGFan

I never called Meghan Markle “nasty.” Made up by the Fake News Media, and they got caught cold! Will @CNN, @nytimes and others apologize? Doubt it!


TOPICS: Breaking News; US: New York; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: braking; clintonnonnews; cnn; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; england; markle; mediawingofthednc; meghan; meghanmarkle; nastywoman; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; sidebarabuse; smearmachine; trump; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last
To: Ann Archy

Ne mean’t she was ‘being nasty’, idiot!


61 posted on 06/02/2019 10:38:30 AM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (0bama's agenda�Divide and conquer seems to be working.?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

This is how Meghan Markle looked before the nose job! lol



62 posted on 06/02/2019 10:45:40 AM PDT by KavMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

I swear the left is off their rockers. They actually believe Trump called her nasty.

I was trolling/slumming on MSN’s story on facebook. They say the dumbest things and even when proven wrong they just keep getting more and more dumb.

Now I need a shower to get the filth off me.


63 posted on 06/02/2019 10:51:27 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (This article needs a fact checked)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale
"Is there anything worth less on this planet than the British “royals”?"

YES! Please observe:

Here's a two-fer:

And here's a 'many-fer':

Yes, there is plenty worth less than the Royal Family and I am only including North America, not even the Euroweenies!

64 posted on 06/02/2019 11:21:29 AM PDT by A Formerly Proud Canadian (I once was blind but now I see...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cecily

Diana admired Trump and wanted to date him but the schedule kept clashing for both.

Whilst Melania is great, Lady Di would also have been a great catch for the President !


65 posted on 06/02/2019 11:23:25 AM PDT by WashingtonFire (We stand for God, For Country and for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

It really is a no-win situation saying anything that can be perceived as negative about that awful woman, Megan Markle. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt but if I were to be meeting her husband and in-laws, I would not be tying this.


66 posted on 06/02/2019 11:32:12 AM PDT by PghBaldy (12/14 - 930am -rampage begins... 12/15 - 1030am - Obama's advance team scouts photo-op locations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Not A Snowbird
said, "He didn’t say “she is nasty”, he said “I didn’t know she was nasty”"

This sounds like the meaning of the word "is" is

"Whatever" it's a none issue.

67 posted on 06/02/2019 11:36:30 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ann Archy

You are an angry little monkey aren’t you.

After more research I have come to belive that Trump intended to state that Markle’s statement concerning moving to Canada if he was elected was “nasty” and not that she was nasty.

But the statement “I didn’t know she was nasty” could certainly and honestly be take to mean calling her nasty. At the very least arguably interpreted to mean either.

A lie is defined as “to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive.”

First, it’s simply my belief NOW that what Trump INTENDED to relay was that’s it was Markle’s statement and not her that was “nasty” but to categorize my initial conclusions as an “untrue statement” is erroneous. It may or may not be as it’s obviously open to interpretation.

Second, from initially listening to the audio, it certainly left me with the impression that he indeed meant she was or at least could be “nasty”. Bottom line, I definitively had NO intention to deceive anyone.

Unfortunately people like you are just as bad as the raving lunatics on the DU other than you happen to be at least on the correct side of the political spectrum. Calling people names that you disagree with, believing there motives to be malevolent just because they don’t jibe with your opinions. Frankly, your hyperbolic mindless ad hominem characterizations embarrass not only you but many of us that politically stand for the same things.


68 posted on 06/02/2019 11:47:51 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonFire

Whatever inappropriate comments Trump made to Howard Stern about Diana that William and Harry may find offensive, Diana herself didn’t do too well by cavorting publicly with the trashy Fayed family. Donald would have been an improvement over Dodi, although I don’t think Donald would have had much patience with her emotional needs. Diana probably needed years of real therapy (not the New Age garbage she liked) and years of strengthening herself before embarking on another marriage.


69 posted on 06/02/2019 11:50:01 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

“said, “He didn’t say “she is nasty”, he said “I didn’t know she was nasty””

This sounds like the meaning of the word “is” is

“Whatever” it’s a none issue.”

Precisely.


70 posted on 06/02/2019 11:51:12 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
will everyone hear this?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump only has 60.8 million followers, so not everyone/i>.
71 posted on 06/02/2019 12:00:29 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Look, this is the kind of nothingburger the junior c-level MSM churns out while anyone above the rank of editor is out getting high at Martha's Whineyard or the Cramptons, or at Fire Island on the down low.

They leave for Memorial Day and return after Labor Day.

72 posted on 06/02/2019 12:12:34 PM PDT by StAnDeliver ("Mueller personally delivered US uranium to Russia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Wait...I thought the women libbies LIKED being called “nasty”.


73 posted on 06/02/2019 12:21:59 PM PDT by boatbums (God is ready to assume full responsibility for the life wholly yielded to him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

He was in a conversation about some mean comments she had made about him. He meant that her comments about him were nasty. Evidently the word “nasty” did come out of his lips.

But without the context, you don’t realize what was actually being said.


74 posted on 06/02/2019 12:27:44 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins

He meant that her comments about him were nasty.

> <> <

Thanks. That clarifies the context for me.


75 posted on 06/02/2019 12:49:01 PM PDT by deks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Yes, but it is still misrepresenting because he did say (I didn’t know) SHE WAS NASTY. They just report the she was nasty part.


76 posted on 06/02/2019 12:51:19 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Royal bookmark.


77 posted on 06/02/2019 1:11:11 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

zer0
hitlary
nazi pelousy
upchuchucky
the 2 terrorscum from MN


78 posted on 06/02/2019 1:28:48 PM PDT by mabarker1 (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

There are as many Brits who dislike Markle as much, if not more than they dislike President Trump. So, it would not be surprising for a “2019 Style-Emotion Ruled” reporter to spice the story up with words never said.
No doubt, England has it’s share of Fake News vendors too.

I don’t care much, but I did think it rather odd for the President to quickly call her comments ‘Nasty’, when they were nothing more than political opposition.


79 posted on 06/02/2019 1:29:27 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

zer0
hitlary
nazi pelousy
upchuchucky
the 2 terrorscum from MN


80 posted on 06/02/2019 1:29:42 PM PDT by mabarker1 (Congress- the opposite of PROGRESS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-119 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson