Posted on 03/27/2019 2:46:46 PM PDT by fwdude
San Francisco, Calif., Mar 25, 2019 / 02:00 pm (CNA).- A group of five Catholic hospitals in California is being sued by a woman who identifies as a transgender man after one of its locations, St. Joseph Hospital, Eureka, refused to perform a hysterectomy.
Oliver Knight is suing St. Joseph Health of Northern California, alleging that she was refused the surgery because of her “gender orientation.”
The suit was filed in the Humboldt County Superior Court on Thursday, March 21. In the lawsuit, Knight says that workers at the hospital canceled the surgery because she identifies as transgender. Knight had identified herself as “male” for a period of four years before the surgery, which was initially scheduled for Aug. 30, 2017.
Prior to the scheduled hysterectomy, Knight had begun cross-sex hormone therapy and undergone a mastectomy.
After the surgery at St. Joseph was denied, Knight underwent a hysterectomy at a hospital unaffiliated with the St. Joseph Health of Northern California system, 30 minutes away.
Knight’s lawsuit suit claims that by denying the surgery St. Joseph Health caused “severe anxiety and emotional turmoil.”
Knight’s doctor prescribed the hysterectomy as treatment for gender dysphoria. Gender dysphoria is a condition in which a person believes themselves to have been “misassigned” their gender at birth.
St. Joseph Health said in a statement reported March 25 that hysterectomies are only performed at their facilities when they have been deemed “medically necessary,” and not for purposes of sterilization. The teaching of the Catholic Church recognizes such procedure as licit when there is a grave and present danger to the life or health of the mother, and when the intention of the procedure is not to prevent the possibility of conception.
In January 2019, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued an authoritative response which explained the circumstances under which a hysterectomy could be morally licit.
A 2016 letter to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services signed by the general counsel for the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, together with other groups, affirmed that the denial of surgery to someone seeking to change their gender would not be discriminatory, noting that in such cases there would be nothing medically wrong with otherwise healthy organs to be removed.
“It is not ‘discrimination’ when a hospital provides care it considers appropriate, declines to perform procedures destructive to patients’ welfare and well-being, or declines to take actions that undermine the health, safety, and privacy of other patients,” the letter said.
“A hospital does not engage in “discrimination” when, for example, it performs a mastectomy or hysterectomy on a woman with breast or uterine cancer, respectively, but declines to perform such a procedure on a woman with perfectly healthy breasts or uterus who is seeking to have the appearance of a man.”
Knight is being represented in part by the ACLU. The suit requests unspecified damages. She also claims to have been repeatedly “mis-gendered” by workers at St. Joseph Hospital, and was allegedly given a pink hospital gown to wear instead of a blue one.
In California, “gender identity” based discrimination is illegal, but the application of the statute in cases involving religious organizations remains disputed.
In 2017, a woman sued California’s largest chain of hospitals, Dignity Health, after doctors declined to perform a scheduled hysterectomy at Mercy San Juan Medical Center. The defendant in that case also claimed that she was denied the procedure due to gender identity.
The case Minton v. Dignity Health was decided in favor of Dignity Health, but an appeal has been filed.
I’ve never heard of hysterectomy being an elective surgery.
But there’s no elective surgery ever invented that will convince a ‘straight’ individual to find the gender confused attractive, no matter how much the gender confused mutilates their own body in an attempt to monetize immature sexual behavior.
Agreed...
If a transgender male has his organ cut off, is that called a misterectomy?
Good luck to the hospital with this case.
If this woman knew any better, she’d have known that she needed to keep all her body parts. We have those body parts for reasons that extend beyond reproduction. They shouldn’t be removed unless necessary because of disease like cancer, for example.
..n’t a hysterectomy removing female body parts? Parts that men do not have? I haven’t been in a biology class since the 70’s and just can’t keep pace with the latest perversions of nature.
_________________________________________________
I’m confused with the titles. When they say a transgendered male, is it a male now, or before they transed?
I get confused and ask, were you born a boy or a girl? I never know where to start.
>>That’s like saying that forcing everyone to agree with a schizophrenic’s claim to be Napoleon is a treatment for schizophrenia.<<
Worse, it us like sewing that person’s hand onto the opposing side.
Believe it or not, fake “women” pretend to have “periods” by dousing their pads with various red fluids and calling it “a flow.”
These people are seriously and objectively delusional.
>> I get confused <<
Me too. Life was simpler when everyone agreed that boys were boys and girls were girls.
Let’s examine the demands made by these lesbians insisting that “their” child be enrolled in a Catholic school.
By allowing such, the child as well as the lesbians would be considered part of the educational community of the school. Therefore, they would be immersed in the Church teaching that marriage is solely between a man and a woman.
I’m guessing that they wouldn’t stand still for that being foisted on them and their child. But maybe that’s the point, to become ensconced from which they can make a platform for their complaint.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.