Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This is Rand Paul's most ill advised stand yet
American Thinker ^ | 03/07/2019 | Gavin Wax

Posted on 03/07/2019 8:44:50 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Sen. Rand Paul loves the Constitution so much that he is willing to put it in jeopardy by opposing President Trump's emergency measures declaration. Paul's libertarian streak has emerged yet again — at a fortuitous time for Democrats hoping to import more voters and a calamitous time for conservatives desperate for a big victory on immigration.

"I can't vote to give the president the power to spend money that hasn't been appropriated by Congress. We may want more money for border security, but Congress didn't authorize it. If we take away those checks and balances, it's a dangerous thing," Paul said while addressing a Southern Kentucky Lincoln Day Dinner.

The above quote illustrates the problem with Paul's constitutionalist line of thinking. While Paul is concerned about proper procedure, his liberal enemies are advancing toward their next goal. While Paul is willing to surrender authority because of concerns over technicalities, the Democrats rush headlong into the next extra-constitutional power-grab that pushes the U.S. Republic closer and closer to dissolution. Paul's "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington" shtick is getting old, and his principles are not usually worth defending.

The principles of libertarians and Beltway "conservatives" always seem to conveniently align with those of big business and corporate capital. This is because of a well financed network of intellectual think-tanks, activist training, lobbying programs, and university infiltration that quietly peddles influence to enforce neoliberal globalist norms among the right. The Koch brothers, for example, are libertarians who use their vast resources to prevent popular trade and immigration reforms from being supported by Republicans in Congress.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events; US: Kentucky; US: Massachusetts; US: Michigan; US: Utah
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; amnestypimps; borderwall; cheaplaborexpress; emergency; gopestablishment; illegals; kentucky; losertarians; massachusetts; michigan; mikelee; mitchmcconnell; mittromney; randpaul; rino; utah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
This is the real emergency in Congress that is threatening our democracy. It is not Trump's emergency declaration, anything involving the Russians, or whatever is the left's latest concocted outrage of the moment. The most pressing emergency is corporate special interests controlling both political parties to enrich their coffers. Paul, in making his supposedly principled stand, enables the swamp unwittingly by blocking Trump from securing the border. It is no coincidence that moderate GOP Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Thom Tillis (N.C.), and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) are standing with Rand to stop Trump's emergency measures.

Unfortunately, Rand Paul is so concerned with "proper procedure" that he fails to see the more overriding concern --- the ideological war.

1 posted on 03/07/2019 8:44:50 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All

If the constitution doesn’t secure our nation or the safety of American citizens, it’s time to ignore it.


2 posted on 03/07/2019 8:47:27 AM PST by JonPreston (If you think we're treated badly now wait untill we're disarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Paul is hard to understand. He is against US involvement in foreign wars, but is OK with his own country being invaded.


3 posted on 03/07/2019 8:47:28 AM PST by o-n-money (We should rename California to Newer Mexico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

National Emergency by Jon McNaughton

This states and shows it all.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKYEE1-U_tc


4 posted on 03/07/2019 8:47:55 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What Rand Paul doesn’t understand is that Congress gave the President Emergency Declaration powers.

In 1976.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergencies_Act


5 posted on 03/07/2019 8:48:12 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How’s this work?

I thought an EO or emergency whatever didn’t need congress’ approval.

Do they need 2/3 or a majority to approve or override, I don’t know which.

Enlighten please.


6 posted on 03/07/2019 8:48:44 AM PST by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think he does understand the issue. I am concerned about the emergency declaration as well. How much extra funding is there with the emergency? One way the President can throw this back in Democrats face is to tell them that any spending bill that comes to his desk must have a plan to return to Article 1 Section 8 spending limits. Let them try to respond to that. He will have forced their hand. At the same time, put the military on the border in large numbers.


7 posted on 03/07/2019 8:48:54 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Congress doesn’t have the Constitutional authority to delegate powers to other branches.


8 posted on 03/07/2019 8:50:06 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Rand Paul is our AOC, and unlike the Democrats, we were actually stupid enough to elevate him to the Senate.


9 posted on 03/07/2019 8:50:16 AM PST by BlackAdderess (Why did Bernie Sanders and Maxine Waters both vote against the Magnitsky Act?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Rand seems to wake up everyday with the world being brand new to him. His brain must be like an etch-a-sketch.


10 posted on 03/07/2019 8:50:23 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston
If the constitution doesn’t secure our nation or the safety of American citizens, it’s time to ignore it.

 

You have this all backwards. The Constitution is not to blame for the failure of idiot lawmakers to adhere to it.

Rand and the Repubs are IGNORING the laws they enacted to protect the US in times like this.

11 posted on 03/07/2019 8:50:56 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Unfortunately, Rand Paul is so concerned with “proper procedure” that he fails to see the more overriding concern -— the ideological war.”

Damn him. And all of those a-holes who stand on procedure in the face of a serious threat.

I understand Paul’s concern, and if it were some legislation regarding some obscure thing, ok, stand your ground.

President Trump is trying to save the country from the permanent political class and their donors. How about you stand for America and Americans, and not some esoteric BS that makes you feel superior Rand?!


12 posted on 03/07/2019 8:51:14 AM PST by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m a libertarian but I’m faaaar from an anarchist. Letting anyone walk into your country, en masse, is pure anarchy. It’s not just a lawless emergency, it’s willful negligence to allow it to happen without at least trying to stop it.

Someone needs to take some fentenyl and stuff it up rand paul’s snout.


13 posted on 03/07/2019 8:51:49 AM PST by z3n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

While I have some appreciation for Paul’s adherence to “principle”, he needs to wake up and realize that we’ve basically lost the republic. The socialists have declared war on us and we have been losing for decades. What Paul is doing is declaring his intention to not fight back. Because principles.

Not a stand I can support at this time.


14 posted on 03/07/2019 8:52:23 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackAdderess

This is possibly the most ridiculous comment I have read here in months. For sure, top 5. Paul is a consistent Constitutionalist. It’s called his oath of office. The Republic will die if we continue embracing pragmatism


15 posted on 03/07/2019 8:52:34 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

Of course not. That power lies solely within the Judicial Branch.

(sarc or no sarc. can’t decide)


16 posted on 03/07/2019 8:53:19 AM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: o-n-money

Libertarianism is uncomfortable wit the concept of nation.
Also uncomfortable with anything that implies constraint on an individual. Most publically (usually loudly!) self proclaimed libertarians that I know conflate libertarianism with libertinism. Not only do they not want any outside party constraining them they don’t want to have any self constraint either.


17 posted on 03/07/2019 8:53:41 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JonPreston

The Democrats can make this their slogan on gun control, radical environmentalism, gender, taxes, health care.


18 posted on 03/07/2019 8:54:58 AM PST by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt

Just curious, how far do you live from the border?


19 posted on 03/07/2019 8:55:13 AM PST by proust (Justice delayed is injustice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: o-n-money

Paul is hard to understand. He is against US involvement in foreign wars, but is OK with his own country being invaded.

He’s an open borders Libertarian. He hates America ever bit as much as AOC.


20 posted on 03/07/2019 8:55:19 AM PST by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson