Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump ties decision on ethanol to keeping campaign promise
Washington Examiner ^ | 10/9/2018 | John Siciliano

Posted on 10/10/2018 4:07:38 AM PDT by Elderberry

President Trump chalked up his announcement on boosting ethanol for farmers in Iowa to his record of "promises made, promises kept," while speaking in Iowa Tuesday night.

"I made that promise to you during the campaign," Trump said. "I made that promise to you during the primaries. Promises made, promises kept."

"We're going with E15 year-round," Trump said early in his speech, admitting that the full announcement would come later in his remarks.

The plan would relax Environmental Protection Agency rules that restrict the sale of 15-percent ethanol fuel blends to eight months of the year. The EPA waiver for the E15 fuel would allow it to be sold year-round, which corn farmers and ethanol producers have been pushing the administration to do for months.

Later in the speech, Trump warned that ethanol production and E15 will be in jeopardy if Democrats take back Congress in November.

"The Dems will end ethanol, you know that," Trump said. "They're not going to approve ethanol. They will find a way to take it away. ... You better get out there and vote."

The second part of Trump's E15 plan seeks to reform the market that refiners use to buy ethanol credits in order to comply with EPA's Renewable Fuel Standard. The Renewable Identification Number credits, or RINs, have been a hot topic of debate among the oil industry.

The Trump plan is an attempt to settle a feud between the ethanol industry and refiners over the direction of the nation's renewable fuel program until Congress can agree on substantive reforms.

The refiners don't want to be subject to the high costs associated with the price of buying RINs. One company in Philadelphia said the high cost of RINs forced it to declare bankruptcy last year.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Iowa
KEYWORDS: abortion; chuckgrassley; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; drillbabydrill; e15; energy; epa; ethanol; flexfuel; genderdysphoria; globalwarminghoax; homosexualagenda; hydrocarbons; iowa; libertarians; maga; mediawingofthednc; medicalmarijuana; opec; oxygenatingagent; partisanmediashills; petrochemicallobby; petrochemicals; presstitutes; smearmachine; waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: Renegade

Sure there is....don’t buy it.


21 posted on 10/10/2018 4:40:40 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Perhaps a deal where we sell/give our corn to starving 3rd world $h!tholes.


22 posted on 10/10/2018 4:41:10 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

“there is no positive reason to add ethanol to gas”.. ?? you need to move your chair closer to the front of the class. theres plenty ($$$$) of reasons ($$$$) to add ethanol ($$$) to gasoline ($$$). Its $$$ leaving ($$$) your pocket($$$) and going to ($$$) the ethanol ($$$) producers who came to power with Clinton ($$$$) got more power with Bush ($$$$) and made ethanol ($$$$) added to gas ($$$) almost bullet proof with obama ($$$$$$$$$$$$$). now trump ($$$$$$) is on the $$$$$$$$ wagon. its all about the money, dummy!! add one of the nastiest human rights and biggest anti human monsters on the planet to the equation...mon$$$$$$anto . they produce gmo corn seed. Monsanto would be my 100% bet to bring out soylent green to your local supermarket if they could. Sooooo you still thing there’s no good reason to add ethanol to gasoline? thats because you’re on the wrong side of the equation.


23 posted on 10/10/2018 4:44:09 AM PDT by Ikeon (I cry because I'm sad, people are stupid, that makes me sad- sheldon cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero

Something...it just seems wrong to me, the incentives to produce ethanol, the whole distribution system is different, the corrosive effects, the cost effectiveness, the effort with water, landspace and fertilizers.

Just doesn’t seem the way to approach it. I readily admit, not being a farmer, I could be wrong-headed on this, but it doesn’t fit intellectually for me.


24 posted on 10/10/2018 4:45:48 AM PDT by rlmorel (Leftists: They believe in the "Invisible Hand" only when it is guided by government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

“Agree!There is no positive reason to add ethonol to gasoline.”

I also agree with this, but I am thinking there is a plan afoot. First things first though, win every rat house and senate seat in the plains.


25 posted on 10/10/2018 4:46:04 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Proud member of the DWN party. (Deplorable Wing Nut))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

It’s funny you say this.

I HAVE broken down the mileage I am supposed to be getting and the mileage I AM getting.

It is about 5 miles a gallon off.

I wonder what type of gas they base the mileage on.

And it seems from what you say, that it does matter.

thanks.


26 posted on 10/10/2018 4:46:16 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
do you strip it with water, or do you have some other method that I maybe unaware of, aka centrifugal force etc.

Ethanol has a greater affinity for water than gasoline.

You add water to the gasohol

Shake it up.

Let it settle.

Drain out the water with the ethanol.

Leaving alcohol free gasoline

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OfZgDkRwAUk

27 posted on 10/10/2018 4:50:24 AM PDT by Elderberry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

DP0622, The EPA drive cycle may have been changed, it wasn’t real world, you may want to research that system vs. real world numbers, I am sure Consumer Reports and or others have opined as to what we really can expect in the real world.


28 posted on 10/10/2018 4:51:03 AM PDT by taildragger ("Do you hear the people Singing? Singing the Song o and my guess .anyf Angry Men!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Yep.

My company car is a 2011 Ford Edge. I’ve experimented a couple of times and have found that regular gas without ethanol will give me about 3 MPG better mileage.

Having said that, I’ve got about 237K miles on this vehicle and have not a single engine problem running E-10.


29 posted on 10/10/2018 4:51:56 AM PDT by 2111USMC (Aim Small Miss Small)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

The first sign of a society gone mad is when they start to burn their food for any reason except to not freeze to death.


30 posted on 10/10/2018 4:59:13 AM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Thanks.

I will investigate.

I was going to buy the car either way most likely.

But the mileage numbers did impress me for a power car and did have some small part in me being it over other fast cars.

On a side note, I’ve owned a number of sports cars.

I don’t know if this Challenger is one. It is MUCH too big and high off the ground to take turns at any real speeds.

It is, however, FURIOUS on a straight path.

Also, the exhaust has been upgraded to add another 35 HP. Now it is LOUD AS HECK. I love it :)

And I can go over curbs when I need a short cut without worrying :)


31 posted on 10/10/2018 4:59:51 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Boat owners everywhere will not like this


32 posted on 10/10/2018 5:07:33 AM PDT by 38special (For real, y'all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

There may be good political reasons for expanding ethanol usage. There are no good non-political reasons.


33 posted on 10/10/2018 5:10:42 AM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

This is bad....I was hoping they would remove this crap altogether not make it worse!!!


34 posted on 10/10/2018 5:16:24 AM PDT by ontap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

I hate - HATE - ethanol, wind, and solar subsidies. But we’ve got bigger fish to fry first so I’m ok with the politics of this. For now.


35 posted on 10/10/2018 5:16:47 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck ( Socialism consumes EVERYTHING!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: Oldeconomybuyer

I agree, and wonder why Trump is in favor of it. Do you think there’s more to the story?

I don’t like ethanol in my car. I also deplore the idea of taking food and converting it to car fuel...So here are my questions.

1. Is ethanol made from corn and other eatable crops, or is it made from the waste products, eg corn cobs, and corn stalks?
2. Is it true that it actually takes more energy to produce ethanol than what it saves?
3. Does ethanol improve mpg? If not, then why are we using it?
4. Does ethanol contribute to higher prices for food? (meat, corn based products etc etc.)
5. Does the gov’t subsidize this industry or can it make it on its own?
6. In summary, what are the facts about this?


37 posted on 10/10/2018 5:18:36 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

Ethanol corn DOES use land that could otherwise be used to grow food. It requires more fertilizer and WAY more water than other crops. There is debate on how much it increases the cost of other food (farmers growing ethanol corn instead of soybeans for example, or feed stock for cattle).


38 posted on 10/10/2018 5:23:49 AM PDT by 21twelve (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Elderberry

Ok, so can you then take the diluted ethanol/water mixture and distill it down to say like 150-175 proof to use for more conventional alcohol burning devices?


39 posted on 10/10/2018 5:24:38 AM PDT by loucon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: taildragger

Corn is bad for cows.


40 posted on 10/10/2018 5:25:55 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The Left doesnÂ’t have ideas, it has cliches. H/T Flick Lives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-110 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson