Posted on 10/01/2018 4:23:06 PM PDT by Magnatron
Julie Swetnick, the woman who accused Brett Kavanaugh of drugging women and participating in gang rapes in the 1980s, spoke out at length about her allegations in an interview that aired on MSNBC Monday.
NBC News started off by noting it could not independently verify her claims. Swetnick spoke to NBC News correspondent Kate Snow about her allegations, made in a statement released last week, that Kavanaugh and his friend Mark Judge attended a party where she was drugged and gang raped. While she did not accuse Kavanaugh of assaulting her, she claimed she witnessed him participate in gang rapes. Kavanaugh has vehemently denied the allegations and denied even knowing Swetnick.
(Excerpt) Read more at mediaite.com ...
It is clear how really bad she is. No defending it at all, except if you are the ComDems and their Lying Fake New Media.
I watched it tonight, totally shamless how they are pushing her to extend the “investigation”. MSNBC crap.
Swetnick is simply not credible.
She’s a gadfly. This kind of nutball always pops out of the wood work in these kinds of high profile situations.
Her ex boyfriend of 7 years was just interviewed on Laura Ingharam and said Swetnick was a certified lunatic. Said he wouldnt believe anything she said. Shes a nutcase.
#3 is a congenital liar. Her story is ridiculous on its face, and she's represented by a notorious scoundrel as her attorney. This claim fails so badly, it damages the narrative.
Accuser #3 is the one that is going to hang him. And, I believe she will.
Swetnick’s boyfriend was just on Ingraham. He seems like a calm, rational guy & he says they were together for 7 years, off/on towards the end. Laura asked him why he never appeared in court for the restraining order (she was calling repeatedly, making threats, etc.) & he said he/wife decided not to antagonize her so instead of following through with a court order, they changed their numbers & moved. When somebody is SO harassing & threatening that you have to move, that’s pretty bad.
Getting sued by a judge has got to suck
Early 70’s
Deep state has been fleecing the tax payer for decades and probably are paying off the press. It definitely looks like some of these media types have skin in this game.
“It says NBC contacted all four. One was dead. If NBC can contact the dead they have one up on countless charlatans throughout history.”
At least we know there is one of the bunch who voted Democrat. The dead one.
I think it was different. Then few parties i went to in the 80s... there were kegs, there were bottles of beer, but for the most part, BYOB. No bowls of punch sitting around.
Again, in scope, these are unchaperoned parties where kids could possibly do things like gang rape (which didn’t happen...)
It was a more innocent time.
Interesting, thanks for the link, and be sure to archive the video now, YouTube won’t let that one stay up.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZLS8sEbwjo
I saw the ex boyfriend interview. He said she would get in her face and tell him to hit her. She was obsessed with lawsuits and threatened his unborn child.
I saw the ex boyfriend interview. He said she would get in her face and tell him to hit her. She was obsessed with lawsuits and threatened his unborn child.
Hello people. I watched the Julie clip tonight. Did any of you hear her refer to Kav as BART??????????? I heard it. So she made this up from Judge’s book. Please check.
Vox Day put it best:
1) SJWs always *lie*.
3) SJWs always *project*.
3) SJWs always *double down*.
Hence, everything they've ever accused *him* of. See also Bill Clinton (literal rapist), Harvey Weinstein, Ted Kennedy (glub glub).
And there's worse.
Sod off, swampy.
The press back then was as bad as now. It has always been bad. Dickens excoriated the American press after his visit here. He didn’t like the British much either.
What the hell does that mean?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.