Replies

Accuser #1 was credible in her testimony(I'm quoting Trump here, personally I didn't feel that way, but who am I to argue with Trump?) but there is no evidence to back up her claim. Without that the claim failed. Then research showed many inconsistent in her story, which were well summarized by the woman prosecutor the GOP hired.

#3 is a congenital liar. Her story is ridiculous on its face, and she's represented by a notorious scoundrel as her attorney. This claim fails so badly, it damages the narrative.

Accuser #3 is the one that is going to hang him. And, I believe she will.

105 posted on 10/01/2018 7:39:29 PM PDT by Jack Black

118 posted on 10/01/2018 9:35:14 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

What the hell does that mean?

120 posted on 10/01/2018 9:50:18 PM PDT by arrogantsob (See "Chaos and Mayhem" at Amazon.com)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794