Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford opens door to testifying next week
Fox News ^ | September 20,2018 | Gregg Re

Posted on 09/20/2018 12:13:16 PM PDT by Hojczyk

According to an email sent by Ford's lawyers and obtained by The New York Times, she would appear as long as senators provide “terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."

In the letter Thursday, Ford's attorneys wrote that it “is not possible" for Ford to testify on Monday. The lawyers added that "the Committee’s insistence that it occur then is arbitrary in any event.”

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 115th; abortion; brettkavanaugh; california; calstatefullerton; christineblaseyford; christineford; conditions; conditionstotestify; fakenews; kavanaugh; kavanaughaccuser; lyinglimolib; maga; negotiations; prcampaign; scotus; slipandfalllawyer; slowroll
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: Hojczyk

I was wrong. I was sure Dems had another accusation or story queued up for Monday. Sounds like they’ll string this one out as long as Republicans will allow it before springing the next surprise. My bet is that she can move the goalposts for at least 3 weeks before Republics decide they’ve had enough.


21 posted on 09/20/2018 12:16:38 PM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone

Just use face time. She can sit on the can if she wants to. just remember, you are sworn in.

Dems are such drama mommas


22 posted on 09/20/2018 12:16:45 PM PDT by PSUGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Of course it’s a trick.

She needs to get drugged up, and they’re desperately looking for another liar.

Monday or nothing.


23 posted on 09/20/2018 12:17:10 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Time to stand firm. They’re trying to delay and string things out with endless, pointless negotiations.


24 posted on 09/20/2018 12:17:10 PM PDT by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JudyinCanada

What is fair is K being allowed to confront and cross examine his accuser. That would not be safe for her. It would get her defamation on the record under oath.


25 posted on 09/20/2018 12:17:46 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Sounds like her lawyers called her and told her to send an email that could be released to the media for the purpose of keeping this story alive and on the front burner.


26 posted on 09/20/2018 12:18:07 PM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

It’s a bluff, obviously. She wants to be able to say, “I was willing to testify but never given the chance.” The senate shouldn’t have to schedule their calendar around this harpy. Get on with the vote.


27 posted on 09/20/2018 12:18:23 PM PDT by MountainWalker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Grassley is required to give a week’s notice for a hearing. Ford could say, okay I will testify next Thurs./Fri. so Grassley would have to give notice today or tomorrow.

Then when it gets close to the hearing day, she’ll renege and say she can’t come until the following week. On and on.


28 posted on 09/20/2018 12:18:47 PM PDT by randita (PLEASE STOP ALL THE WORTHLESS VANITIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Just another stall job. Show up Monday, period.


29 posted on 09/20/2018 12:19:04 PM PDT by mulligan (EeThe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

She says jump, GOP asks how high


30 posted on 09/20/2018 12:20:22 PM PDT by proust ("The rule is, jam tomorrow and jam yesterday, but never jam today.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: randita

NO, NO, NO, she NEEDS to be there on Monday or NO DEAL Grassley needs to grow a pair!!!!


31 posted on 09/20/2018 12:20:59 PM PDT by Trump Girl Kit Cat (Yosemite Sam raising hell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

A timeslot for voting has just opened up on Monday.


32 posted on 09/20/2018 12:21:05 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
English Translation: "We want to keep stalling as long as we can."
33 posted on 09/20/2018 12:21:20 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation has ended!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
This absurd claim--absurd both for being unbelievable as well as not relevant to boot--continues to be pushed as a delaying tactic. It makes me wonder if there is some case scheduled to be heard in early October (new term) over which the Left is desperate not to have Judge Kavanaugh involved?

Of course they are also desperate to try to undermine Trump in November: Our Last Chance? [Can Donald Trump Revive The "Spirit of '76?]

We need to be at least as fired up!!

34 posted on 09/20/2018 12:21:36 PM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

The woman is a fraud and liar. Kavanaugh has a clean reputation but he’s a Supreme Court nominee of a Republican president so he must be slimed and stopped from getting the seat! Monday or nothing for this lefty skank and then vote!


35 posted on 09/20/2018 12:21:42 PM PDT by dowcaet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Maybe she is trying to induce an aneurysm in Grassley.


36 posted on 09/20/2018 12:22:56 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
“terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."

'I demand the right to speak without interruption or to be questioned afterwards. No one is to be looking at me while I testify. When I'm done, everyone must believe everything I said'.

37 posted on 09/20/2018 12:23:09 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

I don’t know if the Court’s schedule really has anything to do with this. It would be great to have him confirmed by October 1st when the next SCOTUS term begins, but if he isn’t seated by then it’s not like he can’t vote on any court rulings during the term. He just has to do a lot of work in a compressed schedule to get caught up on those cases.


38 posted on 09/20/2018 12:24:28 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("The Russians escaped while we weren't watching them ... like Russians will)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

She had 36 years.


39 posted on 09/20/2018 12:25:34 PM PDT by 4Liberty (Where are the Obama-Creamer audio tapes?/GM bondholders: America's SAfrica White farmers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

No conditions. None. Show up and tell your story. That’s it. If we bend anymore to this human garbage we might as well give up any hope of ever seating another Supreme Court Justice period.


40 posted on 09/20/2018 12:26:16 PM PDT by jyo19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson