Posted on 08/06/2018 5:44:08 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
If Democrats win the House in November, 35 women are poised to lead committees and subcommittees in the next Congress — an historically high figure that would put female lawmakers in the driver's seat for some of the most pressing issues facing Congress and the country.
That number would almost triple the amount of GOP women currently holding similar positions, and it would mark a measurable achievement for Democratic lawmakers looking to take the “Year of the Woman” to new heights of power.
The shift also would come at the outset of a crucial 2020 presidential cycle, when Democrats want to topple President Trump — a radioactive figure in the eyes of many women’s groups — and use a long-elusive House majority to battle against the administration on issues as diverse as abortion rights, family separations at the U.S. border and the ongoing probe into Russia's election meddling.
Trump's unexpected victory in 2016 sparked a wave of interest from female candidates, who have jumped into races around the country, increasing the odds of a record number of women occupying congressional seats next year. And while much of the election-year discussion has been focused on those potential newcomers, a shift in legislative power to veteran lawmakers would likely prove even more significant.
“The critical issue is the agenda changing,” Rep. Rosa DeLauro (Conn.), the senior Democrat on the Appropriations Committee’s health and labor panel, said Friday by phone.
The 14-term lawmaker rattled off a list of gender-based issues Democrats are vowing to tackle if they take control of the House, including women’s health care, domestic violence, equal pay and family leave. DeLauro said those were once considered “fringe issues” that went too long ignored or underfunded by Republicans who have controlled the chamber since 2011. She’s been passing out a pamphlet to fellow Democrats arguing that women are uniquely positioned to turn the ship around.
“When women take the gavel, Congress responds to the major issues facing working families today,” it reads.
Rep. Diana DeGette (D-Colo.) argued another benefit of having women in charge: They are simply more open to compromise, a breath of fresh air in a Congress practically defined by partisan conflict.
“I believe women tend to find common ground, work together and accomplish big tasks,” said DeGette, who’s in line to lead the oversight subcommittee on Energy and Commerce.
“As more of us get elected to Congress and fill these critical leadership roles, chances are good that we will see less gridlock and more cooperation.”
They may have a chance to prove that theory next year.
Democratic women are set to take control of six full committees if the House flips in November. They include Reps. Maxine Waters (N.Y.), of Financial Services; Nydia Velazquez (N.Y.), of Small Business; Eddie Bernice Johnson (Texas), of Science, Space and Technology; Zoe Lofgren (Calif.), of House Administration; and Carolyn Maloney (N.Y.), of the Joint Economic Committee.
Rep. Nita Lowey (N.Y.) would become the first woman in history to chair the powerful Appropriations Committee.
In addition, 34 subcommittee gavels appear poised to go to Democratic women if the party takes the House. Those include spots atop five Appropriations panels, as well as influence over other major issues: digital commerce (Illinois Rep. Jan Schakowsky); counterterrorism (New York Rep. Kathleen Rice); higher education (California Rep. Susan Davis); and immigration (Lofgren).
The numbers could fluctuate, but Democrats tend to honor the seniority system when it comes to naming committee heads — a system Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) has largely honored — and challenges are rare.
Party leaders are practically giddy at the thought of positioning more women in power, and they’re taking a page from the late-Ann Richards, the former Democratic governor of Texas: "If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re likely on the menu."
Pelosi on Friday went a step further.
”It is absolutely vital that women leaders take their rightful seat at the table: at the head of the table,” she told The Hill in an email.
The potential for 40 women in high posts contrasts starkly with the Republican-led Congress, where leaders have long been accused of empowering men at the expense of female voices. Former Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) came under fire in 2012 when Republicans seated an all-male slate of committee heads for the following Congress. Under pressure, he later appointed former-Rep. Candice Miller (R-Mich.) to lead the Administration Committee.
Since then, Republican women have fared better. In the current Congress, three full committees are headed by women — Reps. Diane Black (Tenn.) on Budget; Virginia Foxx (N.C.) on Education and the Workforce; and Susan Brooks (Ind.) on Ethics — and nine others hold the gavel of subcommittees. Four of the 12 are retiring or seeking higher office, and won’t be back next year.
GOP leaders are quick to reject the notion that they’re out of touch with women’s issues. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (Wash.), the fourth-ranking House Republican, has long argued that GOP policies like ObamaCare repeal and tax cuts will do more to benefit women than the Democrats’ favored prescriptions. Her office declined to comment for this story, but in May she trumpeted the advantages of having more female representation on Capitol Hill.
“Being a mom makes politics real,” she told Fox News. “That’s why it’s so critical that more women and moms are elected to Congress."
The Republicans’ campaign arm also features several women in its leadership ranks. Rep. Elise Stefanik (N.Y.) is heading recruitment efforts for the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), while Rep. Mimi Walters (Calif.) is the group’s vice chairperson.
NRCC spokesman Jesse Hunt pushed back on the notion that Democrats somehow have a lock on women’s interests.
“Some of the best Republican candidates this cycle are women and we’re confident we’ll see them representing their districts for years to come,” Hunt said in an email.
Democrats have long touted the gender diversity of their caucus as evidence that they're the more inclusive party, one that better represents the different interests of the country at large. And they’re no strangers to propelling women to power.
Pelosi has led the party since 2003, rising in 2007 to become the first female Speaker in the nation’s history. And with several women already announcing bids for leadership positions next year, the number of women at the highest ranks of the party appears ripe to grow.
The 2018 cycle is the first since the anti-harassment #MeToo movement swept the country, toppling titans of business, Hollywood, the media and a handful of lawmakers on Capitol Hill, including the Democrats’ own veteran Rep. John Conyers (Mich.), who was forced out last year.
With Trump dogged by scandals that include allegations of sexual assault and paying hush money to a porn star, the would-be Democratic gavel holders see an opening on the campaign trail, vowing the tough oversight they say has been neglected under Republican rule.
“You can bet the President and his allies within the administration will not be getting a free pass,” DeGette said. “I’ll work to make these inquiries bipartisan when possible, but the priority has to be getting the answers our constituents want and deserve.”
DeLauro, citing gains the Democrats have made fighting child separations at the border, summarized the Democrats’ hopeful sentiments in one sentence: “Imagine what we could do if we were in the majority.”
Will womens' issues now excursively dominate and drive the Democratic party?
How far left will they have to go to appease their radical feminist base?
What a bunch of dummies. And I’m a 75 year old woman.
Too bad they won’t have the majority! They really believe they will do it. LOL!
——women’s health care, domestic violence, equal pay and family leave-—
local issues not national issues
So we can expect a healthy increase in Black and Hispanic men voting Republican. It will happen.
That's a huge Democrat downer right there.
Majority where where? I’m confused.
If you allow women to be your equal, they will rule you.
FALSE premise. Delusional.
The party’s over, literally.
Our domestic enemies want even more riots and mayhem after this election.
This is a judgement!
Good. I hope it’s true, if the touted blue wave happens (which it won’t). As the saying goes “Women ruin everything”, and these female politicians can be expected to really screw things up, even more than male Rat politicians.
all those issues are covered under law and yet the Dems still keep pushing them as if they are being attacked, and women are victims.
CO Dem woman states this is good as women are more open to compromise. LOL You cannot even make this stupidity up anymore with the left.
I the Republicans get anywhere close to 29%of the Black vote that the polls show, it will be a very disappointing and long night for the Democrats on Election day. The Democrats depend on 95% of the Black vote to win elections. If that starts eroding, they are in big trouble.
Just a little presumptuous, aren’t they?
So why would a blue collar family man from the Mid West ever vote for a Democrat?
Wait. I thought they view Trump as Hitler, the anti-Christ and a slave-owning rapist all rolled into one but it will be cool because women are more open to COMPROMISE???
Disconnect.
Marxine Waters has been named the most corrupt member of Congress four times. She should be perfect for this position.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.