"The study, which began last fall, has received $347,176 from taxpayers so far. Research will continue through March 2021."
On, Wisconsin? Our University is out of control. Why do Lesbians need birth control? I'm confused...
*Rolleyes*
To: Diana in Wisconsin
2 posted on
06/07/2018 9:36:19 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
3 posted on
06/07/2018 9:36:28 AM PDT by
GOP Poet
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Which results in lower STDs including genital warts?
4 posted on
06/07/2018 9:36:58 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Spygate's clock began in 2015 - what did President Obama know and when did he know it?)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“...benefits of not having children”
That is what the study was really about. Here is the big red, bias flag.
5 posted on
06/07/2018 9:37:55 AM PDT by
VaeVictis
(~Woe to the Conquered~)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Simply choose abstinence.
7 posted on
06/07/2018 9:38:14 AM PDT by
fulltlt
To: Diana in Wisconsin
The goal of the study is to match women with the method "they will find the most sexually acceptable." Okay, let's see if it fits...
Article I, Section 8:
The Congress shall have Power To...
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, ...
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, ...
To provide and maintain a Navy...
To match women with the method they will find the most sexually acceptable.
Okay, sounds good. Fits right in there /s
8 posted on
06/07/2018 9:39:13 AM PDT by
C210N
(Republicans sign check fronts; 'Rats sign check backs.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Since lesbians DON’T NEED contraception, I’m thinking this has more to do with preventing transmission of STDs.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Is Congress even using contraception when the public is involved?
Learn something new every day...
10 posted on
06/07/2018 9:41:41 AM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(01/26/18 DJIA 30 stocks $26,616.71 48.794% > open 11/07/16 215.71 from 50% increase 1.2183 yrs..)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
How many times have we heard that government should “stay out of our bedroom?” Apparently, there is an exception when some university morons can squeeze almost $350,000 in grant money out of the U.S. taxpayers. They obviously don’t have a real job like those do who earned that money.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
We really need a study of this subject? Pills and other forms of birth control have been around for decades. I’m surprised if there haven’t already been similar studies done.
Maybe couples can talk it over, and decide which methods work best for them, as a couple, considering various aspects of their lives together?
Or is that not good because then there’s no funding needed for a study?
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Inconceivable!
14 posted on
06/07/2018 9:45:57 AM PDT by
golux
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“Feds Spend $347,176 Studying If Sex Is Good With Contraception (WI)”
Do they need a control group...a friend asks.
16 posted on
06/07/2018 9:47:27 AM PDT by
Bonemaker
(invictus maneo)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
“...the social, economic, and health benefits” of not having children.
What? Is this taxpayer funded?
18 posted on
06/07/2018 9:50:51 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
We need a lot more 10th Amendment and a lot less of this....
19 posted on
06/07/2018 9:52:48 AM PDT by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
"Why do Lesbians need birth control? Maybe because of sex with pre-op transwomen?
Maybe because they moonlight with men?
Maybe because of an inadvertent encounter with a turkey-baster?
Surely because sexual orientation is innate, hardwired and unchangeable?
And you think you're confused?
Tagline: Orwell 1984
22 posted on
06/07/2018 9:59:41 AM PDT by
Mrs. Don-o
(Power is tearing human minds apart and putting them back together in new shapes of your own choosing)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Acceptable to women?
This is misandry! As a man, I demand a tax refund!
23 posted on
06/07/2018 10:05:11 AM PDT by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything.)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
New research suggests that SMW women have an increased risk of unintended pregnancy compared to their heterosexual peers.
You're not getting pregnant if you're engaging in homosexual activity. Are these people on drugs or are they that stupid?
24 posted on
06/07/2018 10:40:19 AM PDT by
Trillian
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Send me the check next time, NO! (not bad though:-)
25 posted on
06/07/2018 10:43:58 AM PDT by
Harpotoo
To: Diana in Wisconsin
100% effective. 100% of the time.
26 posted on
06/07/2018 10:44:30 AM PDT by
Delta 21
(Build The Wall !! Jail The Cankle !!)
To: Diana in Wisconsin; Lazamataz
Oh WHERE is Sandra Pluk when you really need her???
...for a study responder, that is. (Down, Laz)
28 posted on
06/07/2018 2:06:19 PM PDT by
Oscar in Batangas
(12:01 PM 1/20/2017...The end of an error.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson