Posted on 06/07/2018 9:33:09 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin
The National Institutes of Health is spending roughly $350,000 to study what methods of contraception are "sexually acceptable" to women.
The University of Wisconsin-Madison study aims for more women to use birth control so they can "fully realize the social, economic, and health benefits" of not having children.
The researchers will follow women using birth control for a year, hoping to discover which contraception method women like best while having sex.
"High rates of contraceptive dissatisfaction, switching, and discontinuation in the U.S. demand new approaches to contraceptive acceptability and promotion," according to the grant for the project. "Behavioral models of contraceptive use have failed to address sexuality, even though contraception is designed for sexual activity."
"By following new contraceptive users across 12 months, this study will 1) document sexual acceptability for a variety of contraceptive methods, 2) determine associations between sexual acceptability and continuation over time, and 3) set the stage for the creation of new, more valid sexuality measures to be used in future reproductive health research and interventions," the grant states.
The goal of the study is to match women with the method "they will find the most sexually acceptable."
"The proposal catalyzes a patient-centered approach to contraception that has the potential to improve women's experiences with their methods," the grant states. "Research from this program could ultimately be used to help match women with the method(s) they will find the most sexually acceptable—methods they will like and use—thereby helping women fully realize the social, economic, and health benefits of contraception."
The study, which began last fall, has received $347,176 from taxpayers so far. Research will continue through March 2021.
The leading researcher on the project is Jenny Higgins, an associate professor in the Gender and Women's Studies Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Higgins specializes in "mixed-methods research on sexuality, gender, and reproductive health—especially people's use of condoms and other contraceptive methods."
Higgins is also currently involved with research into sexual minority women, or "people who identify as lesbian, bisexual and queer (among many other things)." She claims 20 percent of the female population in the United States are lesbians or bisexual.
"The overwhelming majority of SMW [sexual minority women] will engage in [man/woman] intercourse at least occasionally," according to the researcher's website. "New research suggests that SMW women have an increased risk of unintended pregnancy compared to their heterosexual peers."
The study is examining "unique barriers" lesbians and bisexuals have to "adequate contraceptive care."
On, Wisconsin? Our University is out of control. Why do Lesbians need birth control? I'm confused...
*Rolleyes*
How about sterilization?
bookmark
Which results in lower STDs including genital warts?
“...benefits of not having children”
That is what the study was really about. Here is the big red, bias flag.
War is Peace.
Slavery is Freedom.
Ignorance is Strength.
Tagline courtesy of George Orwell.
Simply choose abstinence.
Okay, let's see if it fits...
Article I, Section 8:
The Congress shall have Power To...
To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, ...
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, ...
To provide and maintain a Navy...
To match women with the method they will find the most sexually acceptable.
Okay, sounds good. Fits right in there /s
Since lesbians DON’T NEED contraception, I’m thinking this has more to do with preventing transmission of STDs.
Is Congress even using contraception when the public is involved?
Learn something new every day...
How many times have we heard that government should “stay out of our bedroom?” Apparently, there is an exception when some university morons can squeeze almost $350,000 in grant money out of the U.S. taxpayers. They obviously don’t have a real job like those do who earned that money.
Bwaaa-haa-HA! :)
We really need a study of this subject? Pills and other forms of birth control have been around for decades. I’m surprised if there haven’t already been similar studies done.
Maybe couples can talk it over, and decide which methods work best for them, as a couple, considering various aspects of their lives together?
Or is that not good because then there’s no funding needed for a study?
“:^)
“Feds Spend $347,176 Studying If Sex Is Good With Contraception (WI)”
Do they need a control group...a friend asks.
Contraception is freedom. More useful idiot women afraid to say no.
“...the social, economic, and health benefits” of not having children.
What? Is this taxpayer funded?
We need a lot more 10th Amendment and a lot less of this....
““...benefits of not having children”
I heard that refrain often from my mother.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.