Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/04/2018 7:17:18 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: CFW

Kudos to Kagan


48 posted on 06/04/2018 7:35:28 AM PDT by kanawa (Trump Loves a Great Deal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Good. Maybe they’ll do the opposite to muzzie cab drivers who refuse seeing eye dogs or someone with groceries that have alcohol in the bag or whatever stupid reason they use to deny service.


51 posted on 06/04/2018 7:36:37 AM PDT by SkyDancer ( ~ Just Consider Me A Random Fact Generator ~ Eat Sleep Fly Repeat ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

You can’t make this up. USA story headline:

“Supreme Court rules narrowly for baker who refused to create same-sex couple’s wedding cake”

Link: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2018/06/04/supreme-court-rules-against-gay-wedding-exemptions/1052989001/

NARROWLY? 7-2 is NARROWLY?????

Dang, fake news is getting pretty brazen in their lies.


53 posted on 06/04/2018 7:37:30 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (robert mueller is an unguided missile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

I remember folks touting well at least Sottomayor is Catholic ....so much for that optimism

Ginsburg has always been a lost cause


54 posted on 06/04/2018 7:37:51 AM PDT by wardaddy (Hanged not hung.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW
It's a good call. It's about "participation".

Suppose got a wedding invitation to a "gay" wedding.....and responded...."I will not attend your so called wedding because I do not believe it's what God had in mind."

Can they sue me?? Of course not.

60 posted on 06/04/2018 7:42:19 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

This is a huge win. “It’s about participation”. It should apply to many others. Can you force a photographer to “participate”?? etc etc.


61 posted on 06/04/2018 7:43:15 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Now I support the winner will have to spend more money on lawsuits to make them whole financially


64 posted on 06/04/2018 8:06:19 AM PDT by Vaquero (Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

WINNING!!! It never grows old!


68 posted on 06/04/2018 8:12:05 AM PDT by chesley (What is life but a long dialog with imbeciles? - Pierre Ryckmans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

This made my day.


69 posted on 06/04/2018 8:14:07 AM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Are the Gorsuch bashers here to tell us that this is all part of his “leftist church”?


70 posted on 06/04/2018 8:15:02 AM PDT by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

The first clear defeat for the homosexual movement in many years. Very happy here!


72 posted on 06/04/2018 8:19:14 AM PDT by Midwesterner53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Great day for the Supreme Court.


74 posted on 06/04/2018 8:20:44 AM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

What’s especially sweet is that this opinion was released during “Pride month.”


75 posted on 06/04/2018 8:22:32 AM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Will this affect the case in Oregon where the Christian bakers were driven out of business for their religious beliefs?


77 posted on 06/04/2018 8:29:44 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Conservatives love America for what it is. Liberals hate America for the same reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

This was the legally narrow decision - narrow in it’s legal meaning and importance - that was highly expected, in considering the questions and comments of the justices during oral argument of the case. Time will tell just how important it is. There is still wiggle room on both sides.


84 posted on 06/04/2018 8:41:00 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

If SCOTUS ruled against the bakery, the ruling would not only expose other Christian businesses to litigation, but also muslin businesses who have uniformly refused service to homosexuals.


85 posted on 06/04/2018 8:42:25 AM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

And what about the bakers in Oregon? Will this apply in any way?


88 posted on 06/04/2018 8:48:18 AM PDT by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

The SC walked a fine line that was very smart. Ruled primarily on the hostility that the civil rights commission displayed towards their Christian beliefs. In the bigger picture, I think this means that in Red States you don’t have to worry because you won’t be attacked in the first place. In the Blue States you can plead a hostile environment towards your Christian beliefs. It also does not open Pandora’s box with regard to Islam. That is why they wrote the way they did.


90 posted on 06/04/2018 8:50:13 AM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

Poofters take one goin’ in dry....


92 posted on 06/04/2018 8:51:47 AM PDT by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CFW

WINNING!!!!


99 posted on 06/04/2018 8:59:27 AM PDT by TheStickman (#MAGA all day every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson