Skip to comments.
Connecticut To Give Its Electoral College Votes To National Popular Vote Victor
MSN News ^
| May 7, 2018
| Dominique Mosbergen
Posted on 05/07/2018 8:29:42 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?
Connecticuts legislature has passed a bill that would give the states Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate who wins the popular vote nationally.
The state Senate voted 21-14 on Saturday to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which includes 10 states and the District of Columbia. The state House passed the measure last week, 77 to 73.
(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: bluestates; connecticut; ct; ct2020; insane; popularvote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
Connecticut is throwing away their leverage IMHO. 7 changed EVs would have changed the 2000 election.
But with this plan all candidates need to do is focus on population centers.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Voter fraud in Cali should mean its a democrat anyway.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
So, in 2020 they’ll go to Trump...................
3
posted on
05/07/2018 8:32:58 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(Remember all the great work Obama did for the black community?.............. Me neither.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This law will only be in force until it requires them to allocate the EVs to a republican.
4
posted on
05/07/2018 8:33:02 AM PDT
by
vikingd00d
(chown -R us ~u/base)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This will wind up in Supreme Court.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
So, basically, CT is giving its electoral votes to CA and NY.
6
posted on
05/07/2018 8:33:34 AM PDT
by
rbg81
(Truth is stranger than fiction)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
That sounds unconstitutional; they are disenfranchising their own voters.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Does the Constitution allow this?
8
posted on
05/07/2018 8:34:14 AM PDT
by
IC Ken
(Stop making stupid people famous)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The RATs have figured out that they can’t “import illegal aliens to vote for them,” so they’re trying now to bastardize the Electoral College to try and subvert the country. This is simply a method by which they disenfranchise their own voters who aren’t RATs.
9
posted on
05/07/2018 8:34:20 AM PDT
by
vette6387
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Is this even Constitutional?
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. Explanation It has been enacted into law in 11 states with 165 electoral votes (CA, DC, HI, IL, MA, MD, NJ, NY, RI, VT, WA).
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/
10
posted on
05/07/2018 8:34:34 AM PDT
by
Cheerio
(#44, The unknown President)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
The odds are Connecticut will someday be forced to give their Electoral College votes to a Republican after their citizens vote Democrat.
Delicious stupidity.
11
posted on
05/07/2018 8:34:38 AM PDT
by
Uncle Miltie
(A Second Amendment march to deny leftists their First Amendment rights. Turnabout is fair play.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
7 changed EVs would have changed the 2000 election. I thought Connecticut voted for Gore in 2000 anyway. But your point is correct. The State is giving up its right to voice against the sum of other states that out populate it. Stupid is as stupid does.
12
posted on
05/07/2018 8:34:55 AM PDT
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
I’m embarrassed to live in Connecticut. It truly is the “Nutball” State.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
So all of these states will ignore the will of their own people in favor or NY and CA voters.
14
posted on
05/07/2018 8:35:51 AM PDT
by
LIConFem
(I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
To: where's_the_Outrage?
A corrupt state deeds its soul and its future to the corrupt party. It “proudly” converts itself into a “one party” entity, soon to enjoy all the pleasures it deserves.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
This will last until the first time CT votes opposite the national vote.
Going to kill them in 2020, when their electoral votes have to go to Trump even though the state electorate voted for whoever the D was.
Stupidity of the left cannot be exaggerated.
To: Sacajaweau
"This will wind up in Supreme Court."
To me, it sounds blatantly unconstitutional. They are disenfranchising their own voters. Connecticut could vote 90% for one candidate, and have their vote flipped by the national popular vote.
To: where's_the_Outrage?
Is this legal? Its obvious intent is to circumvent the founders’ reason for establishing the Electoral College.
18
posted on
05/07/2018 8:37:35 AM PDT
by
luvbach1
(I hope Trump runs roughshod over the inevitable obstuctionists, Dems, progs, libs, or RINOs!)
To: Sacajaweau
This will wind up in Supreme Court.
It may, but this will pass constitutional muster. States can direct their electors to vote by any means. It will not get to SCOTUS, though, because they will not have enough electoral votes to trigger the compact.
19
posted on
05/07/2018 8:38:41 AM PDT
by
wizwor
To: Cheerio
20
posted on
05/07/2018 8:39:00 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-172 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson