Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge just delivered a deadly blow to Trump’s DACA plans in bombshell ruling
washingtonpress ^ | 1-9-17 | Joelle Grande

Posted on 01/09/2018 8:48:30 PM PST by Revel

There’s been a huge development in the ongoing struggle to protect the Dreamers, the beneficiaries whose immigration status is protected under DACA.

U.S. District Judge William Alsup of in San Francisco just issued an injunction blocking the Trump Administration from ending the program as it announced it would do in September.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpress.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aliens; daca; federaljudge; immigration; judges; judicialtyranny; trump; trumpdaca; trumpillegals; williamalsup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
In all seriousness, can't we find a judge to declare global warming a hoax and cut off all funding for "research?" Or a judge that will declare the Democrat party illegal?

Why do these off-the-charts ludicrous court rulings (requiring legal challenges and delays) only come from the left?

101 posted on 01/10/2018 5:46:19 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy; Revel; All

>
What a joke. That will be overturned easily. The executive order cannot be overturned with an executive order? Absurd.ignore that bastard.
>

Sweet baby, Jeezus. No offense, but can we articulate our case(s) by their ROOT(s)?!?: NO ‘executive order’ (should) have the force of law, ‘making’ nor ‘subverting’. No such (lawful) authority or power exists.

Course, to bring up said point would fell the house of cards. I doubt it’d even ‘be allowed’ in any court filings, procedures, remarks, etc.

1) Trump, IMO, has been TOO quiet re: PROPER Exec. powers. He should be LOUD, clear and OFTEN.

2) Trump, too, has been TOO quiet calling out CONGRESS re: judicial activism. If anything, calling for breaking up the 9th as the ‘most over-turned in the system’.

I expect no less from the Trump, don’t recall any great articulations of our Constitution, and even LESS from his Uniparty advisors. I’m holding out hope for a ‘great cleansing’ of the Exec. (DOJ/FBI/etc.) should he ever decide WHICH straw is the ‘final’.

/rant off


102 posted on 01/10/2018 5:57:35 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

The solution is simple - constitutional excoriation of rogue justices. Those who brazenly violate original intent should be not only removed but hazed like college freshmen.

Let’s have fun at their expense. I’m serious, but through an amendment, making it legal.

Our education system is so messed up that senators have claimed [for GENERATIONS] that a court opinion is not a reason to remove a judge.


103 posted on 01/10/2018 5:59:45 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Never forget that Obama enabled drug runners into US for Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: montag813

The Judiciary is a fickle mistress.


104 posted on 01/10/2018 6:01:15 AM PST by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

I agree, and so does Ted Cruz by the way. Ignore unconstitutional rulings. Expose them for their sheer absurdity, and dare congress to impeach you.

Only problem is that the DOJ might arrest anyone under the President who agrees with Trump and breaks the ‘law’. He could pardon them and have a volunteer group do things [not Federal employees], but it would be messy.


105 posted on 01/10/2018 6:04:47 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Never forget that Obama enabled drug runners into US for Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dila813
If the Democrats were serious about anything they said today they would impeach this judge with the republicans and tell the Judge that they will not tolerate usurpation of the power of the legislator’s power to make law in the united states.

Zero chance of that, or of the Pubs doing anything either.
106 posted on 01/10/2018 6:09:49 AM PST by TexasGunLover ("Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."-- President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Revel

“U.S. District Judge William Alsup of in San Francisco”

Funny, I didn’t realize District Judge is a higher position than President. Weird.


107 posted on 01/10/2018 6:09:59 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (If we disarmed democrats gun violence would decrease by 90%.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

If I were Trump, I would go scorched earth on Demorats. I would tell them that after this, I will sign nothing regarding DACA unless my desires are met.


108 posted on 01/10/2018 6:16:48 AM PST by dforest (Never let a Muslim cut your hair.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Still have to fund it, though.


109 posted on 01/10/2018 6:18:08 AM PST by ScottinVA ( Liberals, go find another country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truth29

Agree. Send Fuhrer Alsop to Gitmo. Obama opened up a lot of space.


110 posted on 01/10/2018 6:19:19 AM PST by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Barky ignored the court in NO when he stopped drilling operations in the Gulf after the BP mess. Trump should ignore this asshole as well.

This business of judges fighting against the lawful actions of the President is out of hand. Needs to stop and stop now.

Like someone said, how many divisions can this judge call up?

There are some good FReepers in Kalifornication but I’d be happy to see the whole state drop into the Pacific.


111 posted on 01/10/2018 6:19:48 AM PST by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

A Rat hack judge trying to take away Trump’s leverage in the middle of the immigration bill’s negotiations. Outrages and should be grounds for removal.


112 posted on 01/10/2018 6:29:32 AM PST by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Or maybe an immediate and direct response to the leaked email saying that the democrats’ electoral future depends on DACA...


113 posted on 01/10/2018 7:02:56 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Revel
How is this DEADLY?
114 posted on 01/10/2018 7:04:11 AM PST by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: montag813
Aaaand...a Federal judge in Texas ruled DACA unconstitutional several years ago. So this should have no bearing.

And when that ocurred did the WaPo headline it as "DEADLY"?

I think NOT
115 posted on 01/10/2018 7:05:31 AM PST by Cheerio (#44, The unknown President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

Actually, I wouldn’t mind if a judge gave CA to Mexico. It would get rid of CA and would be quicker than helping CA secede.

Unfortunately, he just effectively ruled that Mexico is part of CA, which is a totally different story.


116 posted on 01/10/2018 7:06:41 AM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Revel

Trump and Sessions should ignore the ruling and press forward.


117 posted on 01/10/2018 7:29:15 AM PST by Mr.Unique (The government, by its very nature, cannot give except what it first takes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revel

So, the original DACA ruling by a federal judge was that it was improperly implemented by Obama, but the converse is also improper?

What universe have we fallen into?


118 posted on 01/10/2018 7:35:57 AM PST by fwdude (Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raiderboy

The Dems deem executive orders become part of the Constitution when Dem presidents sign them. Look as all the recent examples? Trannies in the military, restrooms and all private facilities open to all sexes, etc.


119 posted on 01/10/2018 7:39:14 AM PST by fwdude (Why is it that the only positive things to come out of LGBT organizations are their AIDS tests?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Rave on, Bro.

I’m with you.


120 posted on 01/10/2018 7:49:10 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson