To: Red Badger
Two major volcanoes El Chichon in 1982 and Pinatubo in 1991 caused global average temperature to dip as a result of volcanic ash, soot and debris reflecting sunlight back into space. Yes. Volcanic ash and soot can definitely cause cooling.
But it appears that the gigantic release of CO2 from volcanoes does not cause warming. Because CO2 doesn't actually do that. Oops.
2 posted on
11/30/2017 7:27:59 AM PST by
ClearCase_guy
(Benedict McCain is the worst traitor ever to wear the uniform of the US military.)
To: Red Badger
Satellites have consistently shown less warming than computer models. About 10-12 years ago climate scientists agreed the satellite data needed to be adjusted to agree with computer models, which they have been doing ever since. Any data that doesn’t agree with computer models is adjusted until it does.
To: Red Badger
The globe is warming!
The globe isn’t warming!
It’s so confusing! What to wear?
(/s)
4 posted on
11/30/2017 7:35:28 AM PST by
TomGuy
To: Red Badger
The satellite data has never show global warming, which is why the warmists reject it.
6 posted on
11/30/2017 7:36:25 AM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
To: Red Badger
Terrific stuff.
Takeaways:
1) Volcanic activity skewed the data . . . less human influence when adjusted
2) Models are not being updated with HARD DATA . . . that’s like you and I still relying on my preseason Top 20 College Football Poll to pick the CFP Playoff teams instead of game results
3) Those eruptions happened relatively early in our study period, which pushed down temperatures in the first part of the dataset, which caused the overall record to show an exaggerated warming trend, Christy said.
While volcanic eruptions are natural events, it was the timing of these that had such a noticeable effect on the trend. If the same eruptions had happened near the more recent end of the dataset, they could have pushed the overall trend into negative numbers, or a long-term cooling, Christy said.
This point is pretty damning to the hysterics . . . if the volcanoes had erupted later the data might well show a COOLING PERIOD now!
7 posted on
11/30/2017 7:38:28 AM PST by
LRoggy
(Peter's Son's Business)
To: ExSoldier
8 posted on
11/30/2017 7:42:42 AM PST by
DuncanWaring
(The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
To: lonevoice
Well, here is another study that will be ignored by the left.
To: Red Badger
“Global warming has not accelerated temperature...
... rise in the bulk atmosphere the rate of warming has been 0.096 degrees Celsius per decade ...”
= = =
According to the article:
Has not ACCELERATED.
But it IS rising, at a constant 0.096 deg C per decade.
13 posted on
11/30/2017 7:56:36 AM PST by
Scrambler Bob
(Brought to you from Turtle Island, Ipotherwise known as 'So-Called North America')
To: Red Badger
15 posted on
11/30/2017 8:01:37 AM PST by
KSCITYBOY
(The media is corrupt)
To: Red Badger
16 posted on
11/30/2017 8:05:26 AM PST by
Vlad The Inhaler
(United We Stand - Divided We Fall. Remember: Diversity is the opposite of unity.)
To: Red Badger
17 posted on
11/30/2017 8:13:57 AM PST by
bigbob
(People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
To: Red Badger
18 posted on
11/30/2017 8:15:03 AM PST by
DoughtyOne
(McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
19 posted on
11/30/2017 8:23:00 AM PST by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: Red Badger
Man caused global warming as result of higher CO2 levels from burning fossil fuel is the dogma of the climate change cult and not based on any true science. This research again shows CO2 driven global warming to be total bunk and based on manipulation of computer models not real world data.
21 posted on
11/30/2017 8:29:52 AM PST by
The Great RJ
("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatcherhttp://www.stone)
To: Red Badger
The warmists must take more extreme action to preserve their models. I suggest some Chinese ASAT missiles to eliminate that pesky satellite data once and for all. < /s>
22 posted on
11/30/2017 8:33:45 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(The Whig Party died when it fled the great fight of its century. Ditto for the Republicans now.)
To: Red Badger
Butt, butt, butt------🔥🌊🌞☃ Hottest year ever recorded in the millions of years 'erf' has been around blah, blah, blah. 😹🍿🍻
24 posted on
11/30/2017 8:58:01 AM PST by
rktman
(Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
To: Red Badger
I know, there're many different videos to explain the facts. This is the best, easiest, explanation so far. It's the CO2 amplification factor that has been wildly exaggerated. Here is Stefen Moleyneux with an easy to understand explanation of the global warming hoax with supporting data in only 12 minutes.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0gDErDwXqhc
30 posted on
11/30/2017 3:33:04 PM PST by
PushinTin
(Politicians are like diapers, they need to be changed often and for the same reason...)
To: Red Badger
Computer models vs real data.
To: Red Badger
DMSP satellite. No global warming but there has been cooling. Monitoring Earth’s weather since 1962.
33 posted on
11/30/2017 8:07:55 PM PST by
CodeToad
(CWII is coming. Arm Up! They Are!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson