And in other reports...Climate has been changing since...
It’s an old theory called, Steady State
Whether it is a Big Bang or a bunch of individual mini-bangs the scientists are still left with the same problem — how can matter be created on its own out of nothing?
Where is an example of matter being produced by itself that is not a derivative of other matter, e.g. supernova?
Nevertheless I don’t fault scientists for not being able to explain where matter came from. I don’t think it is possible to know that through scientific means while living on Earth.
The Big Bang is just a faith based religion.
Sooooooo, the science “experts” reeeeeeally have no clue what they’re doing after all, huh?
I’m shocked...
“...including one of Indian-origin.”
Why was that clause necessary?
That used to be called “Steady State” which term really only came into use as a response to the new crazy “Big Bang” theory. I remember the science pubs presenting the views as being both tenable theories.
But, . . . But, . . . But, . . what about it being settled science? We already voted!
From the beginning there were several serious problems with the standard Big Bang theory, thus the reason Inflation theory was concocted. Plenty of problems and uncertainties with that as well.
Top Ten Scientific Flaws In The Big Bang Theory
https://thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory/
More Grant MONEY will solve this dilemma...
See the link at the end for explanations.
1) The Horizon Problem
2) Static universe models fit observational data better than expanding universe models
3) The Big Bang theory violates the First Law of Thermodynamics
4) The Big Bang theory violates the Second Law of Thermodynamics
5) The theory of Inflation violates Einstein’s General Law of Relativity
6) Dark Matter and Dark Energy
7) Lack of universal galactic uniformity contradicts the fundamental aspects of the Big Bang theory
8) We should be able to see the Big Bang or shortly after, since the farther you look the farther back in time you see; but we don’t
9) The Flatness Problem, also known as the Oldness Problem
10) The Magnetic Monopole Problem
Top Ten Scientific Flaws In The Big Bang Theory
https://thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory/
Bookmark
It was the atheist “scientists” that believed in the so-called “steady-state” universe that always existed, so that actually points away from God (take note of some of the scientists involved here). Red shift is still a real phenomenon, showing an expanding universe and disproving the ideas of the atheists; and it was Georges LeMaître, the Catholic theologian, that came up with what is today called the Big Bang theory and not the atheists.
If the Universe always existed, then we’re once again pointing to God.
It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth, and the inhabitants thereof are as grasshoppers; that stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in …That one verse describes a spherical earth and the expanding universe. Of course, skeptics try to say that Hebrew חוּג (chug) can only mean circle and never sphere, but their proof is tenuous, trying to cite the word דּוּר (dur, translated “ball” in Isaiah 22:18 and appearing only in this verse) as the only word that can mean “sphere” even though Strong’s indicates that it means either “circle, ball or pile”; and does not negate the other word meaning sphere at all.
— Isaiah 40:22
I’m waiting for some ‘scientist’ to propose the idea that the big bang theory is a product of white supremacy.
Maybe it was a "LITTLE BANG?"
“... their new model in which the universe has no beginning and no end.”
More problems with this theory as well.