Posted on 10/23/2017 11:02:17 AM PDT by george76
State Department Tells Court It Processed only 32,000And Has Yet to Review 40,000 Clinton Records.
Courts Orders Explanation on Processing.
...
The hearing focused on the State Departments progress on processing the tens of thousands of emails Clinton failed to disclose when she served as Secretary of State, some of which were emails sent by Clinton aide Huma Abedin that were found on the laptop of her estranged husband Anthony Weiner. The State Department has processed 32,000 pages of emails so far, a small number of which have been released, but 40,000 pages remain to be processed.
Judicial Watch asked the court to require the State Department to identify any records from the seven FBI discs that it intends to withhold, and why, in a timely manner.
...
Surprisingly, the Tillerson State Department and Sessions Justice Department previously argued to the court that there was diminished public interest in the Clinton emails.
...
The State Department has produced 23 batches of documents so far. At the current pace, the Clinton emails and other records wont be fully available for possible release until at least 2020.
Clinton attempted to delete 33,000 emails from her non-government server. The FBI investigation recovered or found a number of these missing emails, many of which were government documents.
...
Secretary Tillerson should be asked why his State Department is still sitting on a motherlode of Clinton emails, said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. It is disheartening that an administration elected to drain the swamp is stalling the release of documents to protect Hillary Clinton and the Obama administration.
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
.
Looks like Judicial Watch and Info Wars are the sole sources of reality these days.
Getting mighty dark out there!
.
.
Everything the BLM does in the western states is a violation of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and could result in all of the western states reverting back to Spanish/Mexican rule!
.
You know, you need to post links to support assertions that nutty.
.
Have you ever read the treaty?
It gives the government zero surface and water rights. Those rights had to remain with the existing users of the land.
This is standard in all treaties in the Americas that the Spanish or Mexicans negotiated.
If you don’t like it, that’s your problem.
.
Yeah, the land became part of the US and the US got zero ownership. The current owners may have a case, but Spain and Mexico don't.
editor-surveyor, Not as smart as I'd hoped...
My goodness...What a precious cast of characters.
That photo should be censored.
Drudge got tangled in a magical moment with his memories of Harv.....
Drudge is the NFL of news sites...both The Liberty Daily and Whatfinger are cleaning his clock.
Agreed!
Terrific research and connecting the dots when the fbi seems to have no motivation to stay inside the lines to flesh out the colors being seen. This crime is not well remembered - but the murder of LeVoy most certainly is.
HL, it would certainly not be much of a surprise to suddenly find she is a part of the JW family. Always seems to have a finger on the pulse of the criminal activity when there is any to be found. :-0
In my opinion, he changed very shortly after the election. But, yeah, that Harv tweet was a uncomfortably revealing.
.
Your total lack of understanding of land rights is glaring!
If you look at the maps of the public surveys of that land you might start to understand.
The only land that the Feds surveyed in the 19th century was the unclaimed lands. That amounted mostly to that which was too steep or rocky for ranching.
Changing the governance from Spain or Mexico to the US didn’t effect ownership of grazable or arable lands.
This is my business and profession; I deal with it daily.
The US government is 100% wrong every time in the West.
.
The chain of title matters, but Spain or Mexico has no claim. The Bundys likely do however.
.
The treaty self nulifies if violated.
If the treaty is null, the weastern states are free of the Fed Gov manipulation of their rights.
Like I said, link it. And highlight what you’re talking about.
Thanks.
Thanks for the excellent post.
Paging Mr. Jeff Sessions! Please pick up the red courtesy phone in the lobby.
.
If you give a damn you’ll look it up.
I suspect that your motivation is other.
Thanks for the juvenile taunt!
.
My motive was to say I think you're full of stuff when you posted this:
Everything the BLM does in the western states is a violation of Guadalupe Hidalgo, and could result in all of the western states reverting back to Spanish/Mexican rule!
And I guess you can't support that assertion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.