Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: editor-surveyor
It gives the government zero surface and water rights. Those rights had to remain with the existing users of the land.

Yeah, the land became part of the US and the US got zero ownership. The current owners may have a case, but Spain and Mexico don't.

editor-surveyor, Not as smart as I'd hoped...

45 posted on 10/23/2017 4:47:20 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: MileHi

.
Your total lack of understanding of land rights is glaring!

If you look at the maps of the public surveys of that land you might start to understand.

The only land that the Feds surveyed in the 19th century was the unclaimed lands. That amounted mostly to that which was too steep or rocky for ranching.

Changing the governance from Spain or Mexico to the US didn’t effect ownership of grazable or arable lands.

This is my business and profession; I deal with it daily.

The US government is 100% wrong every time in the West.
.


52 posted on 10/23/2017 5:51:54 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson