Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Think You Know How Slanted the Media Is? Read This
Townhall.com ^ | October 15, 2017 | Bruce Bialosky

Posted on 10/15/2017 5:04:24 AM PDT by Kaslin

Every Republican and/or Conservative can spend hours pontificating about how the Mainstream Media (MSM) does not come close to presenting the facts fairly; it is grossly biased. That has grown exponentially since Donald Trump became president. Read this and you will not doubt the veracity of this scenario.

This tale started when Jane Eisner, editor-in-chief of the Forward (“News that matters to American Jews”), sent out an email asking for help. The Forward was founded in 1897 (formerly known as The Jewish Daily Forward). She expressed her concern as to what her publication “had done to contribute to the coarsening of our public discourse and the fracturing of civic comity.” She asked for help by “sending your thoughts.”

As a leader in the Jewish Community who has spent more than 25 years trying to enlighten what I believe are misguided Jews, I saw this as an opportunity. I wrote her to comply with her request. I started by saying “Relentlessly and viciously attacking Republicans and a sitting president, your publication has added to the coarseness of the public discourse. As a fellow journalist, I can tell you among the center/right of center, your relentless attacks on Republicans and the President makes you irrelevant. Not creditable. Dismissed out of hand.” I added some other comments, then ended with “You said you wanted feedback, well there you have it. Maybe if you had more voices like mine or Dennis Prager's you would seem a little more balanced.”

A couple of days later Ms. Eisner responded “Thank you for writing. I am interested in publishing more voices like yours. Would you like to pitch some ideas to [our opinion editor]?” I thanked her and obliged.

I thought this was a great opportunity. Certainly, I would be lambasted or ridiculed by most of the readers, but I can handle that.That comes with the territory of being a Jewish Republican. That is old hat to me. The thought is if we don’t express differing views in their venues, they will never experience anything other than the echo chamber of thoughts they read every day. I was truly excited. This is a well-read publication by the active Jewish community.

I corresponded with the opinion editor and we agreed I would write a column on DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals). The Forward had published typically pro-DACA columns highlighted by a Columbia University professor viciously attacking President Trump for everything except beating babies. It was a perfect issue to start with defining a difference.

I went to work. This column had to be above reproach. I knew I would be attacked. Even though I was well versed on the subject, I read everything I could, particularly the statements by the Jewish leaders. I also knew I had to kill them with kindness; no sarcastic comments (I do that sometimes) and virtually no negative terminology. There was no endorsement of President Trump nor a statement against DACA – just a rationale for taking a legal path if you want DACA to exist and supporting immigration reform.

Most of the people who read my weekly column are familiar with my style and thankfully many of you have grown to appreciate what I write each week. The idea was to make the Forward readers like what I am communicating even if they do not agree with everything I write.

I submitted the column and then waited for the editor’s response. She initially said she liked it and would get back to me. When she responded it was nothing short of stunning. A Jew had not seen this much red since Moses parted the Red Sea. She had rewritten my entire column. It did not resemble my column in fact or tone. For example, she had completely cut a brilliant quote from Andrew McCarthy about how inappropriate and wrong Obama’s comment on Trump’s action had been. Gone.

I let her know what she had done to my column was wrong and unacceptable. Her response was if I did not like it we could kill the column. She stated that the changes were for language flow and fact-checking. When I asked what facts were in question because I had everything sourced, her response was: “Ok, so just kill it?”

Not to leave something like this alone, I called her and as you can guess that went well. She made some comment that led me to remind her I have been writing columns longer than she has been alive and had never had a column completely altered like this. After some more back and forth in which she made clear she was pro-DACA (I couldn’t tell from her butchering of my column), I told her that she was not abiding by Ms. Eisner’s desire to have different voices in the Forward.

That is when she objected and told me “I have run three right-wing columnists recently. I ran Ben Shapiro; you agree he is right-wing.” When Ben ran the column on the Daily Wire it was titled Everybody’s Lying About Charlottesville. The title of the column she ran of Ben’s was Trump Isn't the Only One Lying About What Happened in Charlottesville. No wonder they ran the column. They will always run a column by the other side when they can use it to advance their own arguments. Then they will brand the writer a “high-minded” individual until they go back to deriding him.

I had high hopes for writing for the Forward. I would get their readers out of their echo chamber. Maybe even some would like what I was writing and read my columns in Townhall.com or elsewhere. The liberal press doesn’t really want its readers to consume divergent opinions because they might wise up to how they have been misled. But we must try because otherwise those poor people will live with their misguided thoughts for the rest of their lives. That is a fate worse than death.

Next week read the column that the Forward would not run.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: brucebialosky; liberalfascism; media; mediabias; msm; news; prager; theforward

1 posted on 10/15/2017 5:04:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Since the publication is now “Forward” that tells us all anyone needs to know about Communism.


2 posted on 10/15/2017 5:40:05 AM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Nice try B. B. Jane Eisner? Forward? Never heard of them. Smackdown by nobodies.


3 posted on 10/15/2017 5:46:34 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Left wing Jews, ie Bolsheviks is what we got in this country by the millions.

I would say 80% of American Jews are leftist who hate America and Israel. They created the Soviet Union and now want to create it here.

Nearly all prominent democrats are Bolsheviks.


4 posted on 10/15/2017 6:10:26 AM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Liberal American Jew = Harvey Weinstein


5 posted on 10/15/2017 6:13:22 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (The largest and most dangerous hate-group in the US is now the Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jumper
Exactly, it's in the "Forward" DNA.


6 posted on 10/15/2017 6:25:29 AM PDT by C210N (It is easier to fool the people than convince them that they have been fooled)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I wrote her to comply with her request. I started by saying “Relentlessly and viciously attacking Republicans and a sitting president, your publication has added to the coarseness of the public discourse. As a fellow journalist, I can tell you among the center/right of center, your relentless attacks on Republicans and the President makes you irrelevant. Not creditable. Dismissed out of hand.”

Sorry Bruce, you knew what she was and what her political porn "publication" was before you wrote a word.

You wasted your time.

7 posted on 10/15/2017 6:29:20 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America returns to the Rule of Law)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

Neither have I, and millions probably haven’t either


8 posted on 10/15/2017 6:47:42 AM PDT by Kaslin (Politicians are not born; they are excreted -Civilibus nati sunt; sunt excernitur. (Cicero))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The truth is poison to the left and they know it.


9 posted on 10/15/2017 6:50:12 AM PDT by Spok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

‘We thank you for your response’ seems standard.


10 posted on 10/15/2017 6:50:25 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Leftists these days don’t even have a passing acquaintance with Truth. They really do not want to be disturbed in their Big Media echo chamber. That will only change IF we are strong and can persuade with TRUTH. Too many words/phrases/essays are called ‘Truth’, but are nothing but Leftist talking points. I am hoping the implosion of Harvey Weinstein will facilitate the outing of all the pedophiles in Hollyweird. Male, female, gay, straight, etc., etc., etc. Maybe then the masses in this country will stop worshiping fame and start respecting normalcy. Happily, with Trump’s win, the ‘silent majority’ spoke with a loud voice. Don’t let it be in vain.


11 posted on 10/15/2017 7:27:09 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kaslin,

Tell me, do you still support Corker?

Bob


12 posted on 10/15/2017 7:52:05 AM PDT by Bob Celeste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Bruce’s response to the editor should have been, “Forget it - you’re not ready for the truth”


13 posted on 10/15/2017 8:12:22 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This isn't anything new... Here's an image from the Yiddish Forward from 1936.

I recall my grandfather receiving the Forward in Yiddish (or as he'd call it, "Forverdz") several times a week in the mail, as I was growing up.

Mark

14 posted on 10/15/2017 10:12:41 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Not to worry ...

This is CNN's total viewership.

15 posted on 10/15/2017 4:11:09 PM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

I changed our Sling account to get rid of ESPN. Now, if I could only be rid of CNN, which I never watch but to which I send $2/month. I’m about ready to dump it all.

I can’t wait for real ala carte media.


16 posted on 10/16/2017 2:10:57 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

The Dish Network had a deal something like 30 years ago where you could pick your channels. Lasted for maybe a year. Needs to come back.


17 posted on 10/16/2017 2:31:27 PM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson