Unless the victim is a straight white male...............
Wow. He killed himself over this? Maybe he really was gay after all...
If the facts are as stated in this article, Heather Snow should be fired and the university sued for millions.
Like Islamic terrorists, fags are pure Satanic evil who putrify everything they touch. God has a plan for them, too.
This is where we are headed.
Coming in the future: parents can be prosecuted for refusing to hire an “alternative lifestyle” babysitter; online dating services may be forced to treat “trans” the same as biological M or F; and more.
Fascism in the universities.
Obviously the normal guy was innocent, but that doesn’t matter once you’re accused. You lose all rights. You are always wrong. You are punished. They don’t care what you have to say. If they listen to you, it’s to trap you in your words.
Title IX should be repealed. Completely.
In the mid-1980’s, I had been accused by a homosexual co-worker of having been overheard, by this person, engaging in a conversation where I supposedly was talking about him getting it on with animals. Needless to say, I was seriously concerned about the accusation, flabbergasted, in fact, because it just never happened. This guy was paranoid, totally unhinged. It blew over, and he left the company not long after. He and his partner moved from southeast VA to San Francisco. A seriously, mentally unstable individual, IMHO. Had this happened in a more recent time, I’d have most likely been fired, as no doubt his word would automatically have been taken as truth, no matter the circumstance.
College isn’t THAT important.
Poor kid was clearly a bit fragile to start with, to commit suicide over this. But, that said, I hope his family absolutely cleans out the University with the lawsuit, and I hope that gay student lays awake every night thinking of the “beautiful” young man he murdered. And that administrator. I hope she is haunted but good.
In a just world, these people would be charged in his death, much like those in anti-bullying laws are in some states.
From the article: “And, as Title IX activists frequently remind the public, we must always believe the victims.”
Once in the distant past I sat on a committee formulating sexual harassment policy; the written policy as originally presented continually referred to the accuser as “the victim”. I continually and vehemently stressed the point that the accuser could not be identified as a victim until the allegations in question were actually proven, or at least established at some reasonable level of certainty. And eventually the written policy used “accuser” in the final document that was adopted for the institution.
When dealing with the left, one must always be on guard when it comes to language - they will try to prejudice the system with their choice of words every chance they get, and way too often they succeed.
Crap, our granddaughter goes to UTA! I hate if for her that her university is like so many today where political correctness rules the day! These universities need to be reined in!!
I don’t know if Heather Snow can be sued, but she deserves to lose everything she has and stands to earn. She sounds like an evil person.
If it happened in a class there must be other students who witnessed the event.
Are they silent out of fear?
As a side note to this thread, please consider the following.
”—at least according to the Education Department's broad definition of harassment under its revised Title IX guidance."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Patriots are reminded that the states have never expressly delegated to the feds the specific powers to either establish the Education Department or make anything like Title IX imo.
More specifically, President Thomas Jefferson had officially clarified that the states would need to amend the Constitution in order for Congress to be able to make policy, regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate schools, something that the states have never done.
"On a few articles of more general and necessary use, the suppression in due season will doubtless be right, but the great mass of the articles on which impost is paid is foreign luxuries, purchased by those only who are rich enough to afford themselves the use of them. Their patriotism would certainly prefer its continuance and application to the great purposes of the public education, roads, rivers, canals, and such other objects of public improvement as it may be thought proper to add to the constitutional enumeration of federal powers [emphases added]” —Thomas Jefferson : Sixth Annual Message to Congress
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Also note that the only sex-related right that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect deals only with voting rights, evidenced by the 19th Amendment. And since the issue referenced by this thread is clearly outside the scope of voting rights, the “wicked witch” has no power here imo.
Also, consider that the corrupt feds are arguably using constitutionally nonexistant federal powers to effectively define LGBT people as a protected / privileged class, the Founding States prohibiting the feds from doing such things when they drafted the Constitution.
"Article I, Section 9, Clause 8: No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States [emphasis added]: And no person holding any office or profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state."
Drain the swamp! Drain the swamp!
Remember in November ’18 !
Since Trump entered the ’16 presidential race too late for patriots to make sure that there were state sovereignty-respecting candidates on the primary ballots, patriots need make sure that such candidates are on the ’18 primary ballots so that they can be elected to support Trump in draining the unconstitutionally big federal government swamp.
Such a Congress will also be able to finish draining the swamp with respect to getting the remaining state sovereignty-ignoring, activist Supreme Court justices off of the bench.
In fact, if Justice Gorsuch is approved but turns out to be a liberal Trojan Horse then we will need 67 patriot senators to remove a House-impeached Gorsuch from office.
Noting that the primaries start in Iowa and New Hampshire in February ‘18, patriots need to challenge candidates for federal office in the following way.
While I Googled the primary information above concerning Iowa and New Hampshire, FReeper iowamark brought to my attention that the February primaries for these states apply only to presidential election years. And after doing some more scratching, since primary dates for most states for 2018 elections probably haven’t been uploaded at this time (March 14, 2017), FReepers will need to find out primary dates from sources and / or websites in their own states.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitution’s Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal government’s powers.
Patriots also need to find candidates that are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal government’s limited powers listed below.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphasis added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Under these pernicious “protection” laws, the “victim” is immediately believed, the accused is considered guilty without being proven such, and the accused bears the full burden to prove that what the “victim” says is false.
His family needs to also sue Snow, the message just be sent there are serious consequences when you power and use that power to subvert justice and deny someone rights.
We all knew homosexuality wasn’t to be tolerated, it was to be accepted and practiced.