Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Politico: Trump White House Is Getting Things Ready For A Second SCOTUS Vacancy
townhall.com ^ | 4/7/2017 | Mike Vespa

Posted on 04/08/2017 5:43:23 AM PDT by rktman

This morning Judge Neil Gorsuch was confirmed to the U.S. Supreme Court. For such a non-controversial figure, Gorsuch experienced the full might of the Democratic Party’s attack machine. Still sour at Senate Republicans blocking Merrick Garland, Obama’s first pick to fill the vacancy left by the late Antonin Scalia, through the Biden rule—the Left was determined to stop Gorsuch at all costs. Despite having broad support from across the spectrum in the legal scholar realm—Obama’s former solicitor general supported his nomination—and the highest rating from the American Bar Association, Democrats formed a united front to stop him. They had the votes to block Gorsuch through a procedural hurdle, denying Senate Republicans the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture and move to the final confirmation vote. As a result, Senate Republicans nuked the rules, allowing for Gorsuch to be confirmed by a simple majority. Not liking someone because a Republican president nominated him or her isn’t a good enough reason to block a judge. Democrats learned that the hard way.

Now, should a second vacancy occur, a) Republicans will not have as much trouble to confirm this person; and b) the composition of the Court could become more decidedly conservative. This is why it was probably best for the Democrats to keep their powder dry, but we’ve crossed that bridge.

(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 115th; byeruthanthony; first100days; gorsuch; majority; notfakenews; scotus; senate; supremecourt; truenews; trump; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-234 last
To: rktman
I'm guessing Anthony Kennedy and/or Clarence Thomas.

Anthony Kennedy had stated in the past that he wanted to be replaced by a Republican President because he was nominated by one (and since he's 80 this is most likely his last shot).

There were rumors floating around judicial circles the last few years that Clarence Thomas has wanted to retire in 2012 if Romney won and had told friends off the record that he didn't want to "die on the court" and was hoping for a Republican President in 2016 so he could retire young enough to enjoy his golden years.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the other hand? Personally I think the only way she'll be leaving the court under Trump is in a hearse, she hates Trump so much she will remain on the court if she has to rolled in on a stretcher and propped up for hearings.

I guess that would make Stephen Breyer the wild card, he is pushing 80, but seems to be in good health and there are no real rumors floating around about his retirement. So I guess we'll see...

221 posted on 04/10/2017 7:45:59 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: batterycommander

Yes, and IIRC, Justice Scalia was immediately cremated with no autopsy. Very fishy.


222 posted on 04/10/2017 8:10:44 AM PDT by proud American in Canada (May God Bless the U.S.A. (Trump: I will bear the slings and arrows for you, the American people))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: volunbeer

I did not understand why Ginsberg did not retire during the Obama years, but there must have been a reason.


Supreme Court sharia law judge.


223 posted on 04/10/2017 8:53:52 AM PDT by bIlluminati (Comey - Obstructing justice since 1995! Playing Comey Ping Pong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: bIlluminati

RBG and Kennedy have both expressed the opinion that international law may outweigh the language in the US constitution.


224 posted on 04/10/2017 8:55:21 AM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Something explains her not retiring under Barack.

Yes, something does and I've pondered that for a long time. Sometimes I think it just comes down to personality. Ginsburg is very arrogant and a diehard feminist with an overweening sense of her place in history. She may be just to damn full of herself to ever retire voluntarily.

It's also possible that she just didn't like Barky (narcissists generally can't stand each other) and was determined to wait for the first woman president... only to have Hillary! choke and blow it.

225 posted on 04/10/2017 9:26:06 AM PDT by Valpal1 (I am enjoying the lamentations of their girly-men on social media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Your thoughts are very similar to my own.


226 posted on 04/10/2017 9:27:16 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker
The sad part is that the liberal Kushners seem now to be running policy at the WH, and you know Ivanka is going to be all over getting a liberal justice in to swing the court to the left.

I didn't know the "Kushners" were elected president.

227 posted on 04/10/2017 9:28:35 AM PDT by txlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: txlurker

That’s exactly the point—they weren’t!


228 posted on 04/10/2017 9:29:08 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 227 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

A Ginsberg quote: (I think 2014)

““If I resign any time this year, he could not successfully appoint anyone I would like to see in the court,” the oldest member of the high court said. “[A]nybody who thinks that if I step down, Obama could appoint someone like me, they’re misguided,” later adding that she can “do the job full steam.””

“Like me”....odds are she meant as good as her.

But some think she was referring to her Jewishness and recognizing Obama’s anti-semitism streak.


229 posted on 04/10/2017 9:31:40 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Those who truly support our troops pray for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

What is your irrational hatred for them then?


230 posted on 04/10/2017 9:34:08 AM PDT by txlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: eartick

Wow are you dense.


231 posted on 04/10/2017 10:27:51 AM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]

To: txlurker

What is your irrational hatred for them then?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Do search here on Kushner — see what a lot of us have to say about them.

They are ‘in’ with Jamie Gorelick -— who gets invited to work in the WH. Soros? Father a felon? et al


232 posted on 04/10/2017 11:24:33 AM PDT by PraiseTheLord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Wow are you dense.

Well yes I am. I am made up of precious metals and other heavy material.

But on the other hand, you are just some type of dog excrement which in a few days just blows away.

233 posted on 04/11/2017 3:34:15 AM PDT by eartick (Been to the line in the sand and liked it, but ready to go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: eartick

You are a Lead head.


234 posted on 04/11/2017 12:49:04 PM PDT by arrogantsob (Check out "CHAOS AND MAYHEM" at Amazon.com.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220221-234 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson