Posted on 01/11/2017 4:14:23 AM PST by servo1969
With just ten days to go before he is sworn in as America's forty-fifth president, the political establishment went nuclear on President-elect Donald Trump Tuesday with a double-barreled blast of leaked intelligence reports by CNN and BuzzFeed.
The documents contain explosive, but unverified, opposition research that alleges intel ties between Russia and Trump and also claims Russia holds sexual blackmail material over Trump.
One of the most outrageous unconfirmed allegations in the report claims the Russians recorded Trump watching Russian prostitutes urinate on each other in a Moscow hotel room previously occupied by President and Mrs. Barack Obama.
Now this
Buzzfeed, Cosmopolitan, and CNN got played by 4Chan.
We have the goods on that nasty @realDonaldTrump with hookers smear You will be stunned! Stay tuned! pic.twitter.com/TYgiQdtOMb
-- Jim Hoft (@gatewaypundit) January 11, 2017
According to the leaked intelligence documents: Trump disliked Obama so much that he hired two Russian hookers to piss on a bed that Obama slept on in Russia.
And the liberal media ran with this!
Seriously?
The original story was created by 4Chan user.
According to 4Chan these documents were created by a 4Chan user and sent to anti-Trumper Rick Wilson knowing he would act on this tip:
4Chan discussed this tonight:
** Political hacks emailed documents to #NeverTrump jackass Rick Wilson about Trump making people p-ss on a bed.
** Rick Wilson thought it was real and gave it to leftists at the CIA
** The CIA of the USA put this in their official classified intelligence report on Russian involvement in the US election
** Donald Trump and Obama were both given private sessions with the CIA to discuss this.
** The CIA concluded that the Russians plan to blackmail Trump with this story we made up
The 4Chan users then link to this:
So they took what I told Rick Wilson and added a Russian spy angle to it.
They still believe it. Guys, theyre truly fucking desperate theres no remaining Trump scandal thats credible.
Then theres this
If these journalists were real journalists and not fake journalists then they would have found that the original documents did not conform to CIA or UK intelligence requirements.
US or UK intelligence would never say "CONFIDENTIAL / SENSITIVE SOURCE."
The Trump-Russia intel document headers are CONFIDENTIAL / SENSITIVE SOURCE and the source is allegedly ex-MI6.
The US and UK dont use that header in ANY sensitive material.
Here is more on publishing rules:
It looks like the liberal mainstream media got punked again.
If this is how easy it is to fool the liberal media then Im going to have my niece start sending them her Harry Potter fan fictions as long as she writes Confidential / Sensitive Source at the top.
More .
35 page PDF published by Buzzfeed on Trump is not an intelligence report. Style, facts & dates show no credibility.https://t.co/twa8pJMMtP
WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) January 11, 2017
CNN advertisers should be bunched at the exits like the crowd at a Great...naw...never mind.
Hoaxster trolling mccain on twitter saying he has more stories if mccain wants to classify them. Omg...this story is amazing
Thank you! I sometimes don't see an article until a subsequent post. I'm sure the "posting police" mean well, but I really don't care if I am reading the 1st or the 4th iteration of a story. I am just glad to be able to see it.
And we should all remember to contribute to the FREEPATHON to show Jim our appreciation for being able to post and see this. Thank God we are not limited to the MSM!
If this were only News Agencies, the finger pointing would be squirming “mea culpa’s”. But since this seems to have ensnared Gov individuals & agencies, the News Agencies exist, in part, to report on Gov, Gov individuals, and Gov agencies. The seriousness of Gov agencies et al. being caught up in a serious way from this “duping” cannot be resolved from a simple “mea culpa”.
Either a massive “blame game” erupts, a massive bleach-bit deletion, or a massive Sgt Schultz “I know nothing...” ensues.
Russia must be laughing so hard at what fools people have made of themselves.
The Daily Mail still has it as their main headline which a) is an unusually long lifespan and b) is silly since has been thoroughly debunked.
The enemedia were the ones who got royally #showered. Deservedly so!
I think Jim Hoft was being sarcastic.
DFW Fox 4 got blasted on their FB page for reporting this story. Viewership must be tumbling yet they can’t help themselves and continue to report rumors and innuendo. Have to put my TV on mute and only turn the sound back on to listen to the weather.
Daily Mail is calling it ‘completely fake’, in their headline. Again, beating the useless US MSM to the scoop.
They’re even naming and shaming McShame.....
Interesting how they change the headline but not the bulk of the story and have retained the comments from the now-debunked story.
I wouldn’t indict the whole CIA. I don’t doubt there are a lot of good people who work there, many of whom are probably cringing at this stuff. But the leadership, especially under Obama are indeed worthless political hacks.
CBS news this morning, Charlie Rose and Norah O’Donnell are ready to blow a fuse over this story.
They are buying it hook line and sinker. Visibly outraged and angry.
They are still running with it as I write this.
I hope Trump nails all of this in his press conference.
Was Dan Rather involved in this charade ?
They may be in process of re-writing the REAL story. At least they’ve corrected their headline to reflect that this is completely, FAKE news.
Die-hard liberals really do seem to live in a state of constant denial of reality.
I can’t stand Chris Merrill. For months, he railed against Donald, but he also hated Hitlery. So who did he want us to vote for? I’m glad he’s been exposed as a fool.
That pic of Pepe laughing hard is killing me! It’s early in the a.m, startling my day and I think I woke everybody up spewing coffee.
It is in the CIA report, and does not reference where they got the information. In the old days, this type of material and odd reference would have been declined by the old intelligence crowd...they would not have fallen for it. It would be curious if Congress asks the young analyst who wrote this to appear before a committee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.