Posted on 11/26/2016 6:30:23 PM PST by Helicondelta
Clinton campaign lawyer Marc E. Elias gave the scheme away in an article published Saturday morning at Medium announcing Clinton would join the recount effort in Wisconsin by Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein and that Clinton would join Stein should she also file for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania.
Elias wrote that starting the day after the election the Clinton campaign worked to find ways to reverse Trumps election.
Elias statement:
we have quietly taken a number of steps in the last two weeks to rule in or out any possibility of outside interference in the vote tally in these critical battleground states.
First, since the day after the election we have had lawyers and data scientists and analysts combing over the results to spot anomalies that would suggest a hacked result. These have included analysts both from within the campaign and outside, with backgrounds in politics, technology and academia.
Second, we have had numerous meetings and calls with various outside experts to hear their concerns and to discuss and review their data and findings. As a part of this, we have also shared out data and findings with them. Most of those discussions have remained private, while at least one has unfortunately been the subject of leaks.
Third, we have attempted to systematically catalogue and investigate every theory that has been presented to us within our ability to do so.
Fourth, we have examined the laws and practices as they pertain to recounts, contests and audits.
Fifth, and most importantly, we have monitored and staffed the post-election canvasses where voting machine tapes are compared to poll-books, provisional ballots are resolved, and all of the math is double checked from election night. During that process, we have seen Secretary Clintons vote total grow
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
So I see on Twitter they are reportedly finding foreign donors.. Will that invalidate anything?
Two can play the game, ya know??
No they will play nasty and bring a whole new meaning to the words “threats” and intimidation” to the table.
Nationality? Do you mean citizenship? Millions of voters with nationality other than United States can vote LEGALLY, if they are naturalized US citizens.
This is false. Disqualifying the 3 states electors isn't enough for her to get a majority. She must flip them.
Now if too many states in recount, the Senate picks the President. Paul Ryan could become President.
This is also false.
The President is elected if anyone receives a majority of the electors voting. NOT a majority of 538.
It is also false because the Senate does not pick the President in the event of no majority. The Senate picks the Vice President. The President is picked by the House, with each state delegation having one vote. Trump, not Paul Ryan, would win that vote.
No idea.
Is a recount pile of $$ part of campaign $$? If so, foreign donations are illegal.
Didn’t stop 0bama from running Palestinian donor hotline helpdesks in Palestinian locations.
I don't think so. The Bush v Gore ruling addressed inconsistencies WITHIN the state of Florida. If the "cherry-picking" principle were extended to the rest of the country, then Jill Stein's petition to recount in Wisconsin would automatically force a recount in every other state. Since the Constitution specifically cedes the manner in which electors are selected to the individual States, I can't see that your argument would hold.
Talk about a "nuclear option"!
I heard that he pardoned 60,000 and that 20,000 of them voted.
This continued use of the word "hacked" is an insult to readers' intelligence. Voting machines aren't connected to the internet, thus aren't vulnerable to hacking.
But let's agree it's possible to rig voting machines through installation of manipulated software. And let's say the Russkies wanted to rig the machines. Wouldn't they have to tamper with the software of each and every machine? Sounds awfully labor-intensive. Hard to mess up enough machines to make a difference.
But remember what happened to Jezebel.
2 Kings 9:35-36.
Hillary Says:”Not Accepting the results of the election is a direct assault on our democracy. Don’t be a sore loser”
OK. She obviously doesn’t get that we are NOT a democracy.
We are a representative republic. A republic of states that represent the will of the people for the state in which they live.
First, go ahead and look up global warming on Wikipedia and let me know what you find. Wikipedia is not an unbiased source of information. This is a gut wrenching experience for me that I remember vividly. On election night Dino Rosi was ahead by a couple thousand votes. Over the next few days more and more votes kept coming in from Seattle and other King County cities till his lead came down to 261. Then they had the machine recount and he was still ahead by around 40 if I remember correctly. During the “manual” recount Gregoire gained another 300 votes. The election was stolen despite the rewrite by an unknown Democrat historian posting on Wikipedia.
I've thought since 11/9 that she's acting incongruously with what I would have expected of her after accepting defeat.
I'll bet that she's been choosing her cabinet and other key positions, and going through the motions to "get to work" in January as if she's still going to win somehow.
umm, it’s not Jan 21, 2017 yet.
There is not a snowball’s chance in hell that this will work for them. If fact, I think it will backfire on them.
It’s a good thing Wisconsin state gov’t is controlled by Scott Walker, right? It won’t be the DNC counting votes. So folks need to relax, sheesh.
They’re are approximately 350 million guns in the US. Approximately 300 million of them are owned by people who voted for Trump. Just sayin’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.