Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revealed: Hillary Clinton Schemed Since Day After Election to Steal Presidency From Donald Trump
thegatewaypundit.com ^ | 26 Nov 2016

Posted on 11/26/2016 6:30:23 PM PST by Helicondelta

Clinton campaign lawyer Marc E. Elias gave the scheme away in an article published Saturday morning at Medium announcing Clinton would join the recount effort in Wisconsin by Green Party presidential nominee Jill Stein and that Clinton would join Stein should she also file for recounts in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

Elias wrote that starting the day after the election the Clinton campaign worked to find ways to reverse Trump’s election.

Elias’ statement:

…we have quietly taken a number of steps in the last two weeks to rule in or out any possibility of outside interference in the vote tally in these critical battleground states.

First, since the day after the election we have had lawyers and data scientists and analysts combing over the results to spot anomalies that would suggest a hacked result. These have included analysts both from within the campaign and outside, with backgrounds in politics, technology and academia.

Second, we have had numerous meetings and calls with various outside experts to hear their concerns and to discuss and review their data and findings. As a part of this, we have also shared out data and findings with them. Most of those discussions have remained private, while at least one has unfortunately been the subject of leaks.

Third, we have attempted to systematically catalogue and investigate every theory that has been presented to us within our ability to do so.

Fourth, we have examined the laws and practices as they pertain to recounts, contests and audits.

Fifth, and most importantly, we have monitored and staffed the post-election canvasses — where voting machine tapes are compared to poll-books, provisional ballots are resolved, and all of the math is double checked from election night. During that process, we have seen Secretary Clinton’s vote total grow

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan; US: North Carolina; US: Pennsylvania; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 201611; 2016election; 2016recount; 2020election; alfranken; bloggernews; clinton; conspiracy; election; elias; fraud; greenparty; hillary; hillary2016; hillaryrecount; jillstein; marcelias; markelias; michigan; pennsylvania; perkinscouie; podesta; purplerevolution; purpletreason; recount; russiagate; steinrecount; terrymcauliffe; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 401 next last
To: RegulatorCountry

Wisconsin is not North Carolina. Different states, different procedures & laws.

I’m not naive. I have faith Cankles & Co will be defeated again. If you think having faith is naive then there’s no point in further discussion.


141 posted on 11/26/2016 8:07:35 PM PST by TheStickman (And their fear tastes like sunshine puked up by a unicorn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Gives it to me. It's mine!

142 posted on 11/26/2016 8:07:37 PM PST by TigersEye (Congratulations, President Donald J. Trump! - Let's MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: b4me

I agree with your first premise. Experience will tell you otherwise. Ruthlessness against evil is not necessarily darkness. And I know Israel and their ways well. To beat back evil you have to be more harsh than your enemies. Several members of my family fought in WW2 against the Axis and they told me several stories about what it was like and things that they did which were brutal and inhuman. By standards they could have been considered war criminals but what they did was right and just


143 posted on 11/26/2016 8:08:57 PM PST by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry; ssaftler

I think RC has a point. Only picking narrowly won red states to recount is exactly the same principle as the one in Bush vs Gore. If you recount all states with a margin of 5% or less in either direction it would be fair. What is happening now IS cherry picking.


144 posted on 11/26/2016 8:10:09 PM PST by lovesdogs (Best transition ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TheStickman

I think your believing that Governor Walker of Wisconsin is going to somehow prevent whatever shenanigans that Democrats have planned for this recount is naive, yes, and not just that but ignorant of how state governments are organized.

So, I assume there’s no point in further discussion, as you suggest.


145 posted on 11/26/2016 8:10:22 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

The democrats are not looking to create votes here. Rather, they are looking to destroy them.


146 posted on 11/26/2016 8:11:53 PM PST by FlipWilson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

Oh yeah, because they care about rules.


147 posted on 11/26/2016 8:12:02 PM PST by riri (Obama's Amerika--Not a fun place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak

“If any of this goes to the Supreme Court, Ginsberg must recuse herself because of her previous statements about Trump, avoiding a 4-4 tie.”

LOL. Like that will happen.

The rats want to push this to the courts. The extra votes needed to flip WI, PA and MI are already planted.

Any challenge to the dem’s theft will be decided by the courts...Where the outcome favors satan’s daughter.


148 posted on 11/26/2016 8:12:21 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Obama voters killed America. Treat them accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
Democrat activists in this state wanted Governor McCrory out very badly, more so than they wanted to prevent Trump from winning the Presidency. Several have stated so outright and publicly.

That sounds like post-election revisionism that is not uncommon from losers. If Clinton had won and McCrory had won, they'd be saying they wanted her to be president more than they wanted him out.

149 posted on 11/26/2016 8:12:38 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

It’s just Hillary’s nature to scheme.

#CrookedRecount

There’s not really this hashtag but there should be.


150 posted on 11/26/2016 8:13:39 PM PST by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Why won’t she accept the results?

Snufflulufflgas needs to ask her (after he sends her the question first)


151 posted on 11/26/2016 8:14:03 PM PST by a fool in paradise ( Democrats' last peaceful transfer of power was January 1981.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Hillary and Aliinsky had a fling if you read their letters.


152 posted on 11/26/2016 8:14:50 PM PST by a fool in paradise ( Democrats' last peaceful transfer of power was January 1981.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

It wasn’t revisionism, those statements were made before the fact.


153 posted on 11/26/2016 8:15:47 PM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

If any of these recounts succeed and the electoral vote win is undone, it will be past deadline and too late to seek a recount in, for example, Nevada or NH. Is that correct?


154 posted on 11/26/2016 8:17:11 PM PST by Buttons12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool

George Sore-ass.


155 posted on 11/26/2016 8:17:36 PM PST by Objective Scrutator (All liberals are criminals, and all criminals are liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ken H
HUH? The difference stood at 261 prior to the first recount, regardless of the cheating that got them there.

It is not really all that confusing even for people unable to research further than reading Wikipedia. The margin in favor of the Republican was far greater on election night. Somehow more and more votes kept turning up from urban areas in Western Washington in the days following the election. There should be newspaper articles from the time period available online to confirm this timeline if you want to research further.

But please do not worry yourself. I understand that you do not find any significance in the election that was stolen here.

156 posted on 11/26/2016 8:19:35 PM PST by fireman15 (The USA will be toast if the Democrats are able to take the Presidency in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Your governor has a conflict of interest as he is a candidate.


157 posted on 11/26/2016 8:19:59 PM PST by DarthVader ("These lying tyrants are about to get hit with a tsunami of destruction on their evil reign." Gaffer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Logical me
Election counts don't work that way. Any ballots that are "found" at this late date would certainly be disqualified.

There's a reason why recounts only change the results of an election when the margin is very, very small. It's because the ballots collected on Election Day -- and (depending on the state) on a subsequent date after Election Day in cases of absentee ballots that have to be postmarked by Election Day -- are the only ballots that can be included in recounts. The recounts, then, always involve disputes over ballots that were legitimately collected by the dates required under law, but were either disqualified incorrectly or were counted for the wrong candidate.

So the only way Trump can lose Wisconsin (for example), is if there are 20,000+ incorrectly disqualified ballots out there that were all cast for Hillary Clinton, 20,000+ votes for Clinton that were incorrectly counted for Trump, or a combination of both.

The scenario here is so outlandish that nobody with half a brain really believes it's going to go anywhere.

158 posted on 11/26/2016 8:20:26 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

Comment #159 Removed by Moderator

To: Helicondelta

They know they will not be able to steal this election.

But they do want to tarnish and de-legitimize it...


160 posted on 11/26/2016 8:20:44 PM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 401 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson