Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colossal Stealth Destroyer USS Zumwalt Ready to Set Sail and Join the Navy
Associated Press ^ | Sep 7, 2016

Posted on 09/07/2016 8:18:01 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Edited on 09/07/2016 9:32:11 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: ClearCase_guy
The Zumwalt is, in fact, basically a pocket battleship.

I was thinking more a battle cruiser, given the lack of armor.

41 posted on 09/07/2016 10:53:19 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dagnabitt

only a single helo ?


42 posted on 09/07/2016 11:16:27 AM PDT by reed13k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck
oops. you are right, Spruance it was. In fact it's interesting (to me) to note that for the Ticonderoga they adapted an existing hull with a new weapon system (AEGIS). Then for the Arleigh Burke class they created a new hull and made adaptations to the existing weapon system. This was a good approach to limit the risk, indicative of the so-called "build a little, test a little" approach of not doing too much all at once but always build on previous success in a systematic manner.

This new destroyer is the first time in 30 years that we've seen a new hull with a new weapon system. Will watch with interest to see if that works out as hoped.

43 posted on 09/07/2016 11:23:12 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

What’s wrong with the Dakotas?


44 posted on 09/07/2016 11:29:17 AM PDT by Rannug ("all enemies, foreign and : domestic")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Rannug

Well, once you’ve seen Mt Rushmore, there’s not much more to see.

[/rimshot]


45 posted on 09/07/2016 1:59:42 PM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Abortion is what slavery was: immoral but not illegal. Not yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
The Jolly Green Giant’s favorite centerfold.

Batman, Robin, and Alfred's, too:


46 posted on 09/07/2016 2:09:09 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And what Rough Beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Fifth Avenue to be born?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney

No kidding! Not my idea of a ‘Tin Can’ by any stretch.
QM2, USS Ault DD698


47 posted on 09/07/2016 2:13:21 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
The Ault:


48 posted on 09/07/2016 2:20:26 PM PDT by Cuttnhorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

No kidding? Interesting. Did not know that.


49 posted on 09/07/2016 3:31:12 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Captain Rhino

““Heavily armed non-aviation surface combatant of variable tonnage.””

Except those Japanese ones for which the ‘non-aviation’ does not apply.


50 posted on 09/07/2016 3:33:06 PM PDT by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TalonDJ

You refer to the destroyers that merely look like aircraft carriers?

Come to think of it, the Soviet era Kiev class were officially designated as “heavy aviation cruisers”

This aviation cruiser designation was adopted by the Soviets to apply to several classes of their aircraft carrying ships (Moskova, Kiev, and Kuztnetov) so they could legally transit through the Bosphorus Strait to access the Black Sea under the 1936 Montreux Convention.

The Montreux Convention’s rules are slanted to favor nations that border the Black Sea. So while the Russians to sail very large “aircraft cruisers” through the Straits into the Black Sea, non-bordering states like, for example, the United States, cannot:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montreux_Convention_Regarding_the_Regime_of_the_Straits#Terms_and_consequences_of_the_Convention

However, there are maritime navigation issues that probably preclude taking such large warships through the Strait’s confined and dangerous waters:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bosphorus#Maritime


51 posted on 09/07/2016 7:44:33 PM PDT by Captain Rhino (Determined effort today forges tomorrow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NorthMountain
Thank you. It was 68 years ago, and I long since lost my pictures of the ship. She didn't have the anti-submarine "dazzle" on her then, but she still showed some WW II battle damage, patched and painted over.
52 posted on 09/08/2016 10:29:07 AM PDT by JoeFromSidney (,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

function is land bombardment


53 posted on 09/08/2016 7:22:18 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (NAMBLA to honor Joe Paterno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson