Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Diversity Programs Fail
Harvard Business Review ^ | July 4, 2016 | Frank Dobbin and Alexandra Kalev

Posted on 07/03/2016 6:43:07 AM PDT by C19fan

Businesses started caring a lot more about diversity after a series of high-profile lawsuits rocked the financial industry. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, Morgan Stanley shelled out $54 million—and Smith Barney and Merrill Lynch more than $100 million each—to settle sex discrimination claims. In 2007, Morgan was back at the table, facing a new class action, which cost the company $46 million. In 2013, Bank of America Merrill Lynch settled a race discrimination suit for $160 million. Cases like these brought Merrill’s total 15-year payout to nearly half a billion dollars.

(Excerpt) Read more at hbr.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: aa; dei; diversity; diversityprograms; pc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
I had to go to diversity training once. Full of Leftist lies about 10% of the population are LGBT, women make 78 cents to men, etc. I do not think the political officer appreciated when I questioned his statistics.
1 posted on 07/03/2016 6:43:07 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Diversity programs fail because they are steeped with the intent on punishment of white descendants who have committed no wrong. Sins of the father are not a legitimate foundation upon which to anchor “diversity programs.”

They go against all innate human nature, frankly.


2 posted on 07/03/2016 6:46:52 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

You want to watch them go nuts, ask why Diversity is a business value. The generic statement “having many different backgrounds is good” is a straw man on its face.

Ask “why do we celebrate people based on their gender and color of their skin instead of their contributions? That sounds like racism and sexism to me.”

I am glad I left my PC company and their Womyn in Business and Diversity crapola. I hope they choke on it and go belly-up because of it (it has already started — the new c in charge has started destruction of the business through BAD decisions).


3 posted on 07/03/2016 6:51:03 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I want to puke every time I hear a Leftist proclaim ‘diversity is our strength’. NO, COMMONALITY IS OUR STRENGTH! Only when we pull together, with a common purpose, do we have strength! Immigrants used to come to America to embrace the American Dream, basically to work hard and strive for a better life. Now the majority of immigrants, the ILLEGAL immigrants, are coming here to live off the hard working American taxpayers. This is all by design. Bankrupt the country and then you can implement a new form of Government. Cloward-Piven at it most disgusting. Diversity brings nothing more than the pitting of one or more groups against the others. Wake up, America! Or all of our American Dreams are just pipedreams!


4 posted on 07/03/2016 6:51:29 AM PDT by originalbuckeye ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
This article is a lot of nonsense. Diversity programs fail because they aren't supposed to succeed. They're intended to shield the employer from legal trouble -- and that's it. That's how I ended up in a company that has an established "diversity program" that is trumpeted all over our marketing materials and our internal communications. As I once said in a senior management meeting: "We should be proud of our diversity here. We have Protestants, Catholics and Jews among all the non-Hispanic Caucasians in this room."

This is the same reason why OSHA regulations don't make a workplace any safer. A company that complies with OSHA regulations is only doing it so they can certify that they are OSHA-compliant. Meanwhile, mandates imposed by the company's insurance carrier do far more to improve workplace safety than OSHA does.

5 posted on 07/03/2016 6:53:43 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

From the article:

“If these popular solutions backfire, then what can employers do instead to promote diversity?”

Wrong question. The right question is: “other than avoiding lawsuits, what is the point of diversity?”


6 posted on 07/03/2016 7:00:16 AM PDT by freedumb2003 (Don't mistake my silence for ignorance, my calmness for acceptance, or my kindness for weakness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

If diversity was really a strength, they wouldn’t have to keep nagging us about it, telling us over and over diversity is a strength, ordering us to “celebrate” it. People naturally gravitate toward things that are good. We don’t have to be badgered about them. The truth is, people flee diversity any chance they get. Diversity is a tremendous problem.


7 posted on 07/03/2016 7:08:39 AM PDT by Nea Wood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

What do you mean, sins of the fathers? A family member of mine lost his life freeing the slaves. Another family member took a family of former slaves home with him to the north, found them a home and a job, and I noticed in the 1880 census that they were still living across the street from my grandparents. Don’t tell me about guilt!


8 posted on 07/03/2016 7:11:27 AM PDT by MondoQueen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

I have a friend who is a senior manager for Intuit. They have a list of employees who cannot be let go because of “diversity” and the possibility of lawsuits. They figure it is cheaper to keep unproductive “diverse” employees than go to court.


9 posted on 07/03/2016 7:16:41 AM PDT by wjcsux ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

“Morgan Stanley shelled out $54 million—and Smith Barney and Merrill Lynch more than $100 million each”

um . . . No....

the CLIENTS and CUSTOMERS of those companies paid those fines in higher fees. The STAFF and other SALARIED folks at those firms paid those fines in lower wages.

“Citizen’s United” declares companies people, but they don’t pay. I’m cool with that. But actual people pay. those fines, as well as those political gifts (bribes).


10 posted on 07/03/2016 7:17:04 AM PDT by Macoozie ("Estoy votando por Ted 2016!" bumper stickers available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
This is the same reason why OSHA regulations don't make a workplace any safer. A company that complies with OSHA regulations is only doing it so they can certify that they are OSHA-compliant. Meanwhile, mandates imposed by the company's insurance carrier do far more to improve workplace safety than OSHA does.

I don't know about OSHA so much, but I do know that employees take the safety stuff seriously. I try to do a safety walk-through every month, but over the last couple of months, other things kept me very busy and I was not able to do the walk-through. Then, at a baby shower, one of my employees asked if I wasn't doing them any more.

Oops.

Doing the safety walk-through does not accomplish much in itself (I have never found a serious issue), but it gives the employees that the employer cares about safety, and they are more mindful as a result. That is a good thing, because one of the things I do not handle well is people being injured and bleeding.

11 posted on 07/03/2016 7:18:47 AM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wjcsux

“They figure it is cheaper to keep unproductive “diverse” employees than go to court.”

-

Isn’t that just ducky——and the productive employees can carry the full work load.

.

.


12 posted on 07/03/2016 7:19:24 AM PDT by Mears (Afrocentrism is "the invention of tradition"-----Hobsbawm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

These programs fail because they are scams. Jesse Jackson, sharpton, Obama, and a host of lawyers make millions off of humiliating whites with lies. The shakedown scams have become a billion dollar business.


13 posted on 07/03/2016 7:23:18 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: originalbuckeye

Many of us are aware of the shakedown. It is nothing but another criminal enterprise.


14 posted on 07/03/2016 7:25:32 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: exDemMom
Well, yeah.

Of all the people in the world who have an interest in the personal safety of an employee, the employee himself is at the very top of the list. That's why my prior employer had almost no safety rules and a perfect safety record. Meanwhile, my current employer has more safety rules and safety initiatives than I can count -- and we can't possibly be any safer than my prior employer.

In other words, the safety initiatives have no purpose other than giving the company the ability to document the fact that they have implemented them.

15 posted on 07/03/2016 7:27:03 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Sometimes I feel like I've been tied to the whipping post.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MondoQueen

I completely agree with you. The problem is with that intent to cast guilt on descendants solely because of their color; not to actually assign rightful blame. It is racism of the worst kind.

It is the primary reason why ‘diversity training’ is complete bullshit.

The underlying reason falls into the line about “the slave dreams not of being free, but of being master.”


16 posted on 07/03/2016 7:27:39 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

Exactly. Follow the money. Millions in extortion. The difference is most blackmail victims don’t extol the virtue of being blackmailed.


17 posted on 07/03/2016 7:28:01 AM PDT by wastoute (Government cannot redistribute wealth. Government can only redistribute poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MondoQueen

Yep, I have two relatives that fought for the north on a monument in Vicksburg. This is one more reason the war between north and south should never have been fought. I’ve never heard an African offer even a sliver of gratitude.


18 posted on 07/03/2016 7:29:22 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarme)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

In the 80s there were many cases where a minority candidate wasn’t hired/promoted and the job went to a less qualified candidate. That’s VERY rare these days - employers now want the best candidate who will take the salary they budget for the position.

In the 80s employers went overboard with quotas and it still happens today even if they call it diversity instead of quota. By definition, diversity programs do not hire the most qualified candidate. That means

A) The company/organization will probably not do as well as they can
B) Less qualified diversity hires won’t do as good as their peers and make diversity programs look bad even when the diversity hire receives extra mentoring or lighter load (which looks bad to everyone else)
C) Moral goes down when better qualified employees are passed over for a “diversity promotion” (and the diversity-promoted manager will have a more difficult time than a qualification-promoted manager because of their own qualifications and the extra moral problem. Repeat A & B)

That’s a recipe for failure for the business, the diversity program, and individuals in position because of the diversity program.

That doesn’t even count the woman who never wanted to do STEM in the first place but saw a college and career path that looked appealing 10 years ago because of the scholarship and hiring practices for women. But some are not happy with STEM 5 years into the career. Some women are awesome at STEM careers and love it. The others are working with peers who love it while they want to find another career but are locked in for many reasons until they get to management - tough to compete with peers in that case and get to management. (Or pick any other minority and diversity-based education and career sales pitch)


19 posted on 07/03/2016 7:29:36 AM PDT by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

If you assume all people have equal ability, you will make some bad business decisions. Reality is stronger than denial and will punish you eventually.


20 posted on 07/03/2016 7:31:41 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters ("Immigration Reform" is ballot stuffing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson