Posted on 05/30/2016 5:11:08 PM PDT by Rockitz
WASHINGTON, D.C. — A writer for The Huffington Post is still waiting for an explanation as to why editors deleted his piece reporting that the FBI will pursue an indictment against Hillary Clinton. Huffington Post freelance contributor Frank Huguenard, a scientist and public speaker, wrote a report for the liberal site Sunday entitled “Hillary Clinton to be Indicted On Federal Racketeering Charges.” But the piece was not up for long before the Huffington Post pulled it down and replaced it with a “404” Error screen.
“Huffpo has yet to respond to my request for an explanation,” Huguenard tweeted at this Breitbart News reporter Monday morning. “I’ve got my sources, they never asked.”
Huguenard later told Breitbart News, “I want to do another story but my HuffPo account has been temporarily disabled. Not sure what’s happening with them.”
Huffington Post Politics senior editor Sam Stein told Breitbart News that he doesn’t know why the piece was pulled.
...
Huguenard, an apparent Bernie Sanders supporter judging by his Twitter account, wrote that the FBI will recommend indicting Hillary Clinton on racketeering charges. Huguenard wrote:
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.
...
James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Thanks for the ping, LucyT.
Another head-up-his-ass, crybaby Bernie supporter.
We might as well be listening to some good music…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13z-7tN1Xj0
Wah, wah...
Wait for Katherine Herridge. She also has more that one trusted FBI leaks. Let’s wait for her. May break tomorrow or Wednesday.
Some legal points:
RICO would be huge.
Could ensnare both Clintons, senior staff. mid-level staff would talk quickly, looking for deals.
Legally, they are on firm evidentiary grounds if the e-mail investigation led them to information about illegal activities at CGI.
Significant jail time and tens of millions of dollars could be seized.
If indicted, a RICO charge, as opposed to just the e-mail problem, will open flood gates of DC insiders trying to tell their story and save self/power.
People hate public officials who take bribes.
This is a Clinton nightmare.
If anyone thinks the ‘Toons are untouchable, remember a man named Bill Cosby?
The longer they keep propping her up, the harder the fall will be.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Ms. Clinton is done. Indictment or no indictment.
A read the original and some other comments on this. Appears unsourced speculation. Too bad, not surprised for this point that it was pulled. Get sources and I bet lots of site, including HO, will publish.
...and who will soon be using the Clinton model in preparation for their retirement from ‘public’ service?
The BHO Crime Family.
Some brilliant Freeper called it a long time ago.
Hillary should be brought up on RICO charges they said.
It appears that may indeed come to pass.
"The Clinton Foundation is “organized crime” at it’s finest, and we are financing it!
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton Foundation works as a tax free international money laundering scheme.
It may eventually prove to be the largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money sent to you and re-package it, to be used for your own purposes. All tax free. Here’s how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign “charity.” In this case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarch’s & governments, then donate to this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did contributing mega millions. I am sure they did this out of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing in return. (Imagine Putin’s buddies waking up one morning and just deciding to send un-told millions to a Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate donations & makes a massive donation the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation, and the cooperating Canadian charity claim Canadian law prohibits, the identification of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation, then “spends” some of this money, for legitimate good works programs. Un-fortunately, experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the balance goes to enrich the Clinton’s, pay salaries to un-told numbers of hangers on, & fund lavish travel, etc. Again virtually all tax free, which means you & I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation with access to the world’s best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this on their tax filings. They discover these “clerical errors” and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result foreign money, much of it from other countries, goes into the Clinton’s pockets tax free & untraceable back to the original donor. This is the textbook definition of money laundering.
Oh, by the way, the Canadian “charity” includes, as a principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy who was central to the formation of Uranium One, Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests & then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia.
This transaction required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of State when the approval was granted?"
--Mark
Guistra is full of crap.
This is unbelievable.
Read this crooked bastards statement below.
What good work does the "Clinton Foundation " do anyway?
NOTHING
An article published in the New York Times (“Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal” April 23, 2015) suggests that my contributions to the Clinton Foundation were made to further my business interests.
This is not true! I support the work of the Clinton Foundation because I believe in the Clinton Foundation’s mission and effectiveness. The world is a better place because of it. As a philanthropist, I am extremely proud of the significant work we do to help thousands of people all over the world. We are truly changing lives.
I would like to take this opportunity to explain and clarify some of the questions that have been raised.
Some media outlets have asked us why we have not publicly disclosed the donors that have contributed to the Canadian charity – the Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada). The Clinton Giustra Enterprise Partnership (Canada)’s Board has followed Canadian laws and Canadian charitable best practices where donors have a right and an expectation of privacy which we have respected as a Canadian charity. We will not share or publicly disclose our donor’s information unless we received prior written consent.
Journalists have challenged this and have claimed we do not need to provide donors the right to privacy. Therefore, we have sought advice from our Canadian legal counsel and received a legal opinion which supports our statement, as per Canadian laws and Canadian charitable best practices, that donors have a right and an expectation of privacy.
In addition, we have also sought independent legal advice from a leading practitioner in Canadian charity law and expect a second legal opinion to be forthcoming in the following days and which will be posted on the FAQs page of our web-site. Even though there is no formal requirement to disclose our donors, in light of these inquires, we are reaching out to our major donors requesting consent to publicly recognize their contribution.
Wendle, as a former federal agent who conducted Title 18 criminal investigations under RICO, I can tell you this matter has all the earmarks of a solid multiple count RICO case.
I’m not Katherine Herridge, but I hope I have lifted your spirits until she tells you the same.
obama will have to grant clemency to 20 people but don’t doubt he will . He will say that Comey is a bush bot provocateur.
Freepers have, as far back as last April. It was the nexus & lexus of the Judicial Watch FOIA last year as well in regards to something she did w/ Israel.
Maybe I have heard it from Col. Hunt on Howie Carr's show but that I won't hang my hat on...
What happened to Scalia. That’s what I want to know.....
The Internet is forever.
I too have some experience.I appreciate your expert opinion. The key is pre indictment clemency. I now realize imo that obama will have to grant 20-30 clemency decrees, including Bill, hILL and Humma Wiener, Sherill Mills and Jake. But so many rats in the nest. !! He will have to stop any trial by the Trump administration. THIS IS SO huge!!
Did you forget Chelsea? She worked for the Foundation, or was she just the piano player in this house of Ill repute...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.