Posted on 03/28/2016 9:27:05 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
Let me begin with this. If the National Enquirer wrote a story about me cheating on my wife with five women, I had better be extremely definitive in my response; because if I’m not, my wife –smelling the guilt – would kick my ass. OK, let me also tell you that I wouldn’t be angry; in fact, I’d be ecstatic. It’s fun to count money from guaranteed punitive and compensatory damages in a multimillion dollar lawsuit.
But that’s me. I can’t speak for Senator Ted Cruz except to say that so far his reaction seems —well, not exactly definitive. He calls it “garbage and false,” not exactly a denial. Then he plays the victim, calling it an attack on his family; “offensive to Heidi and me, they’re offensive to our daughters,” he writes.
Actually, it’s not an offense aimed at your wife or your daughters; it’s aimed at you, Senator. Then, there’s the attack on Donald Trump.
(Excerpt) Read more at latino.foxnews.com ...
“Cruz will not sue National Enquirer for the same reason countless celebrities who get smeared do not — it’s the National Enquirer”
Total BS, if the story is false teddy could take them to the cleaners, but he won’t, Discovery would be Hell on Earth.
No, it simply means that the story as reported is incorrect.
Democrats anger levels:
1) no
2) stop
3) racist
4) bigot
5) sexist
6) xenophobe
7) HITLER
8) LITERALLY HITLER
9) REEE
10) (PTSD from Internet)
You butthurt now that I exposed your lightweight tactics? Don’t get on here defending a post from a jew hating liberal like Rick Sanchez and expect any respect.
If you are going to make a point on here don’t use a liberal or a liberal website to do it.
It’s kinda like using select quotes from Carl Jung as a biblical exegesis. It’s just stupid.
Hurry up and get back to your buddies in the Mark Levin thread where they love the word libtard. Yes, I guess you have the rope, now use it on yourself.
BBBAAAHHHAAAAAAA
Trump probably would but, then, Trump’s middle name is “Litigious”.
“Cruz doesn’t deny, he attacks the messenger - he’s on the run.”
Actually he has been non stop attacking Trump with no real proof to back it up.
How old are you seriously. You go back to name calling, and yet can’t state a fact?
you have the rope
I’m not sure of the breakdown, but you are probably correct in the general idea.
I would agree.
That does not dismiss this story as false though, nor does it make it true.
The point is, one cannot totally discard the paper because they do have a track record of getting some stories right, where other agencies wouldn’t touch them with a 10’ pole.
A batter doesn’t have to bat 1.000 to be considered valuable.
Sounds like you hit a nerve, lol.
Cause its a big deal when Cruz MIGHT have a infidelity problem but its boring when Trump is on his third wife because of his cheating.
Everyone else in the media has at best tiptoed around this story...even Drudge has avoided it.
But Fox is giving it a nudge.
Hulk Hogan will be beyond rich with the $115 million he won from Gawker.
1. Why was $500k given by a Cruz Pac to his rival, Fiorina, in June of 2015?
2. Why was Heidi Cruz sitting on the side of a highway, when a cop found her to be a danger to herself?
3. Where are the defamation lawsuits?
Cruz’s lies make Clinton look like a piker.
One big dif is Clinton was smart enough to know when to shut up.
You have anything else “constructive” to add? Anything? I’ll choose a Mark Levin thread over a Rick Sanchez thread any day. Why don’t you tell us all why you wouldn’t...then get your sorry liberal ass back to DU.
The msm is nothing more than a PAC for dimoKKKRATS. Getting fired could be a badge of honor.
Trump's history is an open book.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.