Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cruz: I'm fine with contested convention
The Hill ^ | 03-09-2016 | Jesse Byrnes

Posted on 03/09/2016 8:09:34 AM PST by scooby321

Ted Cruz says he would have no problem with a contested convention over the summer in the event neither he nor Donald Trump secures enough delegates before then to lock up the Republican presidential nomination.

Trump suggested Wednesday morning on "Fox and Friends" that Cruz was making the statement "because he had such a bad night last night."

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: 1stcanadiansenator; 2016election; brokeredconvention; bush; contestedconvention; cruz; election2016; establishmentcruz; flipflop; gopconvention; lyingted; romney; rubio; stoptrump; stoptrumpmovement; tedcruz; tedspacificpartners; texas; trump; trumpertantrum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-463 next last
To: scooby321

I knew it. He got the deal.

LoL


41 posted on 03/09/2016 8:20:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

cruz would be fine with ritual sacrifice if it gets him elected


42 posted on 03/09/2016 8:20:13 AM PST by jneesy (I want my country back and Trump is gonna give it to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Did anyone read Trump’s own words? “I agree with him he should be saying exactly that. The difference is I can get there.”


43 posted on 03/09/2016 8:20:18 AM PST by Bayou Dittohead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Because nothing says anti-establishment than Chris Christie.


44 posted on 03/09/2016 8:21:06 AM PST by LdSentinal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman

Maybe Beck told him to listen to flaming bushes.


45 posted on 03/09/2016 8:21:23 AM PST by Kudsman (Restore the Republic. Repeal the 17th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

If this doesn’t tell folks what Ted is, nothing will.

GOPe bought and paid for.


46 posted on 03/09/2016 8:21:42 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Facing Trump nomination inevitability, folks are now openly trying to help Hillary destroy him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Does or did Mrs. Cruz work for Goldman Sachs? Is on leave from them? Anyone know?


47 posted on 03/09/2016 8:21:59 AM PST by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

I’m still holding out faint hope that Cruz is implementing a rope-a-dope strategy, cooked up with his meeting with Trump a few months ago. Cruz plays the GOPe puppet, soaking up establishment votes, money, endorsements, and support. At the last second, he drops out, and publicly endorses Trump, giving the establishment no time for a counter move.

But if he is doing this, he is a far better actor than anyone could have thought. My hope in this scenario, which was never strong, is fading. Cruz is probably what he appears to be.


48 posted on 03/09/2016 8:22:02 AM PST by jjsheridan5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Trump needs to make a smock for Cruz to wear to the next debate, emblazoned with all of the logo patches of his donors.....this is actually what the California legislature is proposing for legislators to wear when speaking from the floor......for all the world to see who is sponsoring who.

It is called ‘Nascar Politics’

http://www.sanjoseinside.com/2016/03/02/political-nascar-a-republican-millionaires-plan-to-shame-the-california-legislature-into-reform/


49 posted on 03/09/2016 8:22:02 AM PST by Be Careful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MaskedMan

I’m not going to vote for any nominee selected by the GOP.

And I don’t support anyone who supports such a scenario.

Comprehend that.


50 posted on 03/09/2016 8:22:16 AM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kudsman
I agree with Cruz.

Mitt Romney needs more than additional delegates in Republican primary fight

Brokered Convention?

51 posted on 03/09/2016 8:22:17 AM PST by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
I guess I have mixed feelings about a contested convention. I get that if one of the candidates does not have a lock on the required delegates then they have to do something else. It's the way conventions used to be in the 19th and early 20th century. But if the GOPe tries to thwart the will of the people who voted in the primaries and pull some loser like Romney out of their asses as a "compromise candidate, I'm afraid for me it will be "no sale".

We're all going to have to accept the fact that the GOPe would rather lose to Hillary than win with Trump.

52 posted on 03/09/2016 8:23:01 AM PST by Sans-Culotte ('''Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small''~ Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

This bothers me. If it is REALLY a two- way numbers tie, or close to that, then fine, open the convention. But if Trump has the required number of delegates, or a few under, then he is the nominee. I say this not because I want Trump, because I don’t, but because anything else is immoral, unethical, dishonest and just plain wrong.


53 posted on 03/09/2016 8:23:29 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Ted’s latest conversion should be made very clear by Trump Thursday night.


54 posted on 03/09/2016 8:23:46 AM PST by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Cruz cites 1976. Ford did not have a majority of delegates committed when the convention started. Ford and Reagan had to compete for the other, available delegates. What was the alternative?


55 posted on 03/09/2016 8:24:22 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jjsheridan5

If he is indeed doing this, he should be given a special Oscar.

Best performance by a candidate in a supporting role.


56 posted on 03/09/2016 8:24:48 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

He figured out he can’t win fair and square.
He bailed last night because he knew he had no way of winning, so he got ‘sick’ and hid like a little girl.


57 posted on 03/09/2016 8:25:27 AM PST by mabelkitty (Trump 2016! #NoDNoR - Send Congress packing - third party in 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Trump should be able to use all the contested convention talk.

Point out how dirty, disgusting, nasty, divisive it is likely to be. That even now republicans are arguing that we SHOULD ignore the winner in delegates. The rules say that people does not necessarily win the nomination, but it’s hard to make the case to voters that it’s fair unless the actual nominee have overwhelming support (and there is no such person right now)

The process will be more vulgar than anything Trump has said. No matter who becomes the nominee it will give Hilary an advantage. And it gives the democrats a better chance of getting the senate back if it’s divisive.

If you don’t want a contested convention Trump will very soon be the only choice. The real decision will then be Trump or Hillary.

I’d guess he’s making that case behind the scenes to potential endorsers and those who want to attack him now but are worried about the divisive convention.


58 posted on 03/09/2016 8:25:44 AM PST by LostPassword
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mase

“how do they determine who the candidate will be?”

How about the guy with most delegates wins? That is what it should have been all along.


59 posted on 03/09/2016 8:25:52 AM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

“He cannot get to the 1,237, so as a person that can’t get to 1,237, I agree with him, he should be saying exactly that,” Trump added. “The difference is I can get there.”

I wouldn’t bet on it, Donald.


60 posted on 03/09/2016 8:25:58 AM PST by KansasGirl (Ted Cruz for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 461-463 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson