|
If you would like to be added to the
|
The irony here is Cruz didn't need to lie. If he had remained honest, he would still be competitive. Liars lie, they can't help it.— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) February 17, 2016
I just find it odd that while the typical Cruz supporter is hyper-religious, they are utterly blind to his constant LYING. It's just weird.— Bill Mitchell (@mitchellvii) February 17, 2016
Originalists don’t think Cruz is eligible.
Now that he is dead, he’ll vote for the DemocRat.
What kind of an idiot writes about who the dead guy would have voted for when he made no such pronouncement while he was living?? Utterly stupid post.
I can't imagine Scalia supporting someone who cannot speak in complete sentences.
Wow this is just low, even for Cruzers
Thanks for the post!!
A logical, reasonable article.
Just a few more weeks of this and Cruz can go back to his full-time job of being the good obstructionist in the Senate that he is.
I’ll thank him for it too....
More made up nonsense from Cruz’s pro-ObamaTRADE
pro-GoldmanSachs pro-dirtytricks supporters.
If it's a best guess, then the headline should say "My best guess" or "in my opinion".
In may very well be true, but it's bad form to attribute your own opinions to a highly popular, departed person who can't corroborate the point.
We hate it when the left says "Jesus would have voted democrat".
Not needed.
Scalia indicated at least twice that you needed to be born on US soil to run for POTUS
First Cruz fans politick off of his still warm body, now they decide for a dead man whom he would have voted for.
Creepy.
My best guess is that Rachel Stockman would have voted for TED CRUZ.
SHE PROBABLY WOULDN’T RECOGNIZE SCALIA IF HE WAS FLOATING FACE UP IN HER SOUP.
Now the trolls are out using Scalia’s death to generate hits for their stupid blogs.
Probably. But inside Washington when people observe each other closely little things count for a lot. A lot of people who by rights ought to be for Ted aren’t.