Skip to comments.
The Constitution Does Not Require the Senate to Vote on a Nomination
Weekly Standard ^
| February 14, 2016
| Adam J. White
Posted on 02/14/2016 5:50:00 PM PST by SMGFan
Senator Schumer appeared Sunday on ABC's This Week and responded to suggestions that the Senate might not confirm the lame-duck President's nomination to replace the late Justice Scalia: "show me the clause [in the Constitution] that says [the] president's only president for three years."
True, Presidents serve four-year terms. But here's a question for Senator Schumer: Can you show me the clause that says the Senate must vote on, let alone confirm, a President's nominee?
I'll save him the effort: There is no such clause in the Constitution
(Excerpt) Read more at weeklystandard.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: adamjwhite; recessappointment; scotus; senate; stupidparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Will the GOP oppose the media and the emotions they create?
1
posted on
02/14/2016 5:50:00 PM PST
by
SMGFan
To: SMGFan
I think these people want violence.
2
posted on
02/14/2016 5:51:15 PM PST
by
WENDLE
(Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
To: SMGFan
schumer a douchbag. In 2007, he called for obstruction on any late term SCOTUS pick that GWB may have had an opportunity to offer
3
posted on
02/14/2016 5:51:48 PM PST
by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: SMGFan
The Repubs will crater like the Sea of Tranquility. Book it.
4
posted on
02/14/2016 5:52:31 PM PST
by
gg188
(Ted Cruz, R - Goldman Sachs)
To: WENDLE
Less than a decade ago, Schumer advocated doing the same exact thing if any additional Supreme Court vacancies opened under former President George W. Bush.
Deviant liars all.
5
posted on
02/14/2016 5:52:41 PM PST
by
Sasparilla
(Hillary for Prosecution 2016)
To: SMGFan
6
posted on
02/14/2016 5:53:22 PM PST
by
biggredd1
To: SMGFan
Two words: Miguel Estrada.
To: SMGFan
Maybe we could sedate a bunch of libs, surgically remove their spines, and send them to the Senate GOP caucus.
8
posted on
02/14/2016 5:53:46 PM PST
by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
To: Sasparilla
..Deviant liars all..
It’s no wonder Trump is the phenomenon that he is.
9
posted on
02/14/2016 5:54:01 PM PST
by
Sasparilla
(Hillary for Prosecution 2016)
To: SMGFan
i didn’t know the WS was garbage. Now I do.
10
posted on
02/14/2016 5:54:21 PM PST
by
dp0622
To: SMGFan
11
posted on
02/14/2016 5:54:34 PM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("The goal of socialism is communism... Hatred is the basis of communism" --Vladimir Lenin)
To: Sasparilla
I saw the video in 2007 with Schumer telling bush not to make any SCOTUS appointments ( Actually, I wish he hadn’t) But can you believe rubio loves Schumer?
12
posted on
02/14/2016 5:55:44 PM PST
by
WENDLE
(Trump is not bought . He is no puppet.)
To: Wally_Kalbacken
I followed the nomination fiasco at the time. Estrada was one of about half a dozen. Frist helped bury most of them after the gang-of-14 (led by McCain) action.
13
posted on
02/14/2016 5:56:14 PM PST
by
Cboldt
To: SMGFan
i dont post vanities.
but is there a way the forefathers left us to shoot down ruling by the SCOTUS????!!!!
14
posted on
02/14/2016 5:57:22 PM PST
by
dp0622
To: SMGFan
New York Sen. Charles E. Schumer, a powerful member of the Democratic leadership, said Friday the Senate should not confirm another U.S. Supreme Court nominee under President Bush "except in extraordinary circumstances."
"We should reverse the presumption of confirmation," Schumer told the American Constitution Society convention in Washington. âThe Supreme Court is dangerously out of balance. We cannot afford to see Justice Stevens replaced by another Roberts, or Justice Ginsburg by another Alito."
Schumer to fight new Bush high court picksPolitico - 07/27/07
15
posted on
02/14/2016 5:57:28 PM PST
by
SunStar
(Democrats piss me off!)
To: biggredd1
Via your link:
"We discovered the judge in bed, a pillow over his head. His bed clothes were unwrinkled, he was lying very restfully. It looked like he had not quite awakened from a nap" said John Poindexter.
To which I say Holy Jumpin' Jesus! Does anyone know of someone who routinely or even occasionally goes to sleep with a PILLOW over their head!?!?
This should be front page news and 24-7 on all the channels.
Oh wait, Justice Scalia was a conservative.
Down the memory hole THIS story goes!
16
posted on
02/14/2016 6:01:07 PM PST
by
mkjessup
(Islam is the ENEMY of all civilized people. Obama is a Muslim. Do the math.)
To: SMGFan
I wonder if Scalia is watching this in delight. He is the center subject of his argument:
http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/06/a-view-from-the-court-some-surprises-in-penultimate-session/
On the first question, he says, 'the majority has to invent new rules for how long a recess can be before the President is allowed to make recess appointments: A three-day break is too short. A four-to-nine day break is probably too short, unless the President can persuade a court that the situation was really urgent. And ten days is probably long enough most of the time, although the majority isn't really clear about that." "These new rules have no basis whatsoever in the Constitution," Scalia continues. "They are just made up."
I will miss him
To: Sasparilla
Last year Reid changed the rules to end filibusters on judicial appointments.
Now he and the rest of the hypocrites are demanding the Senate 'confirm', as Sanders put it, Obama's SCOTUS pick. And claiming the republicans are blowing up the Constitution if they don't.
18
posted on
02/14/2016 6:02:53 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: WENDLE
Eggs Ackley! But they will be sorely disappointed and have to manufacture their own Reichstag fire, because they have so succeeded in dumbing down the people that America will end with a whimper, not a bang. we are witnessing it as we type. America is falling. Filth like Schumer are so happy about that!
19
posted on
02/14/2016 6:04:21 PM PST
by
MHGinTN
(Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
To: SMGFan
Somebody should ask Schumer why Obama said in July of 2008 that he would be POTUS for “the next 8 to 10 years”.
Obama was never a VP who filled out the last (under) 2 years of his President, so he can only have 2 terms. How was he thinking he would get the extra 2 years? Couldn’t come before his 2 terms so it would have to come after his 2 terms. What would have to happen late in his 2nd term, for him to continue on for another 2 years instead of a new POTUS taking office.......?
Somebody needs to ask ALL the DC critters that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-68 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson