Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

There Is Only ONE Candidate We Can Trust To take On A Leftist Court
Vanity | 2/13/16 | OV

Posted on 02/13/2016 3:19:03 PM PST by OneVike

There is but one candidate running for POTUS that has the knowledge and fortitude to take on a Leftist Supreme Court. We can bicker and fight all day long about why every candidate has the best chance at defeating Hillary, or fixing the country, but when the rubber meets the road there is only one who we all know has a record of defeating the leftists in court. TED CRUZ!

If every Freeper does not get behind him, and Donal Trump wins, then do not bitch and complain when in 4 years from now a 7-3 or 8-2 leftist Court removes any and all remaining rights and freedoms the constitution now gives you.

Forget about your rights to bear arms, GONE!. Planned Parenthood's right to dismember live babies and sell off their parts, confirmed! God, or at least the Judeo/Christian God, GONE! Your right to your own property, taken away by a court that believes the constitution gives the Federal Government and corporations more right to your land than you have. Agenda 21, confirmed and increased as the court allows foreign law and the United nations to supersede the constitution. Any and all production of fossil fuel, shut down to save the planet.

I could continue listing the things we will lose, but I'll leave that to your imagination. Besides just check Democrat Underground and other sites for the things the leftists across this country are busy dreaming of coming true.

Wake up brother and sister Freepers. There is but one man running that has the experience and fortitude to take on a leftist court and appoint conservatives when and if the leftist judges fall away.

Time to put down our arms. Put aside our differences and make amends by admitting the truth that Ted Cruz is the only one we can trust to appoint conservative constitutionalist judges to the Supreme Court.

The only man the rest of the world despises. When the world hates you, you must be doing something right.

OK, I am ready for your attacks.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 114th; antoninscalia; bhoscotus; cruz; enoughalready; gotrumpgo; iambetterthanyou; ibtz; obituaries; obituary; politicizingthedead; putdownthecrackpipe; scalia; scotus; shameful; stfu; supremecourt; texas; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last
To: Sun; OneVike

Meant to say FIFTH Amendment, last two sentences (not 2nd).


121 posted on 02/14/2016 12:51:54 AM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: TerrisFriend
We have to get united behind Senator Cruz.

Difficult to get behind a sitting Senator when NONE of the 99 OTHER Senators in the Senate have endorsed him.. NOT ONE!

WHY is that???

122 posted on 02/14/2016 1:09:01 AM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sun

I meant to say I’ll buy every fifth round of tequila, but I’ll buy every second round!

Tequila for everyone!


123 posted on 02/14/2016 1:11:07 AM PST by glock rocks (TTTT !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

That’s if you believe Trump didn’t just “convert” to “conserving-tism” on guns, abortion, taxes, etc. just to win the primary. He is still liberal on many issues, like NSA surveillance which he loves. If he looks for a judge who backs the NSA surveillance he likes, we’re losing something already. Not to mention, if many GOP presidents appointed bad judges they didn’t “sniff out” properly, how can we expect political newbie Trump to not make the same mistake?

Will any of his immigration policy stand when there is a court who will block it on “equal protection” violations? No conservative law will stand.


124 posted on 02/14/2016 1:20:05 AM PST by JediJones (RUSH LIMBAUGH on TED CRUZ: "This is the closest in our lifetimes we have ever been to Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor

Why are you looking to people like Lindsey Graham to help you make your decision?

7 Senators endorsed Rubio,

5 Senators endorsed Yeb.

2 endorsed Huckabee.

1 each endorsed Kay-sick, Paul and Graham.

Which of those candidates are you backing due to those oh-so-valued Senate endorsements? The Senate being the liberal cesspool that it is.


125 posted on 02/14/2016 1:25:26 AM PST by JediJones (RUSH LIMBAUGH on TED CRUZ: "This is the closest in our lifetimes we have ever been to Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: NoDRodee

>>>Trump say the SCOTUS ruling on gay marriage was the “law of the land”<<<

It is the Law of the land. Try and stop a Gay Wedding and see what happens. Sorry, the truth is a bitch sometimes.

Just wait until the inevitable “If they can do it so can I” Lawsuits pop up for Incestuous and Polygamous Marriage.

You ain’t seen noting yet.


126 posted on 02/14/2016 1:26:18 AM PST by Kickass Conservative (Get the CDS and TDS Vaccines before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Why are you looking to people like Lindsey Graham to help you make your decision?

Give it a rest with the avoidance of answering my SIMPLE question.

So.. ANSWER my question.

WHY does Cruz NOT have ONE endorsement from a fellow Senator.. NOT ONE! WHY???

127 posted on 02/14/2016 1:51:38 AM PST by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

You’re absolutely right. A “conservative” appointee can and may turn liberal, but a liberal appointee only gets more liberal. aka Earl Warren, Souter, Roberts


128 posted on 02/14/2016 5:20:40 AM PST by 2nd Amendment (Proud member of the 48% . . giver not a taker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: JediJones; All

Many valid counterpoints from you and others, JediJones. Most all of the remaining players have brought us to this point -

http://www.usdebtclock.org

Problem. They did build that. They (current and former) should all be in prison for plundering America.

Socialism Is Legal Plunder - Bastiat

Enforcer/Beneficiary - IRS and the weaponized agencies of the superstate.

“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.” - list of grievances; Declaration

6. But the grand nostrum will be a public debt

7. It must not be forgotten that the members of the legislative body are to have a deep stake in the game. This is an essential point, and happily is attended with no difficulty. A sufficient number, properly disposed, can alternately legislate and speculate, and speculate and legislate, and buy and sell, and sell and buy, until a due portion of the property of their constituents has passed into their hands to give them an interest against their constituents

8. The ways in which a great debt, so constituted and applied, will contribute to the ultimate end in view are both numerous and obvious. (1) The favorite few, thus possessed of it, whether within or without the government, will feel the staunchest fealty to it, and will go through thick and thin to support it in all its oppressions and usurpations. (2) Their money will give them consequence and influence, even among those who have been tricked out of it. (3) They will be the readiest materials that can be found for a hereditary aristocratic order, whenever matters are ripe for one. (4) A great debt will require great taxes; great taxes, many taxgatherers and other officers; and all officers are auxiliaries of power.

Rules for Radicals? No, “Rules for Changing a Limited Republican Government into an Unlimited Hereditary One”

http://www.constitution.org/cmt/freneau/republic2monarchy.htm


129 posted on 02/14/2016 5:35:31 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: VideoDoctor

You cannot understand my point that the Senate is NOT conservative? There’s a reason Mark Levin says the amendment to give us direct election of Senators was a major turning point in the decline of our country. The vast majority of Senators have not endorsed anybody. Do you think that means they hate all the candidates?


130 posted on 02/14/2016 10:51:47 AM PST by JediJones (RUSH LIMBAUGH on TED CRUZ: "This is the closest in our lifetimes we have ever been to Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-130 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson