Posted on 09/19/2015 8:44:04 AM PDT by McGruff
Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s top aides have belatedly turned over more than 100,000 pages of emails they had kept on personal email accounts, or accounts tied to Mrs. Clinton’s server, the government told a federal judge late Friday.
Huma Abedin turned over an estimated 23,000 pages of emails, Philippe Reines gave back 70,000 pages of messages and Cheryl Mills returned somewhere in the neighborhood of 11,870 pages, the Obama administration told Judge Rudolph Contreras in a court filing.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...
This is not good news for the Hildebeast.
Scrubbed and good to go.
Amazing!
Who wants to read more e-mails? We already have her on enough to put her away forever.
It matters not what is in her emails.
She is untouchable.
And unlike Mrs. Clinton’s emails, the State Department does not have plans to post online all of those three aides’ messages, instead deciding to release only select messages that are requested through particular open-records demands.
I would assume that Judicial Watch has already put in such requests. Time will tell.
Since Hillary mailed them all, should not they
be near a similar number of pages (at least).
Mills’ and Huma’s paper shredders must have
run continuously.
Who'd want to touch that!
The best thing about not lying? You don’t have to remember what you said.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hillary-clinton-addresses-private-email-situation/story?id=29529931
“State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the documents will be available online on a government website.”
Anyone know where we can go to see these `documents’?
Notice it says they turned in “pages of emails”. Once again, it looks like they printed out the emails, thus removing all of the metadata (all recipients, time stamps, servers used, etc), as well as making it difficult if not impossible to tell if the emails were modified before being printed out.
I thought it was illegal for govt workers to use private email for govt work, PRECISELY because of classified material, no?
Still waiting for the one to hang her/shut her up!
I don’t know enough to say this for sure, but ...
It seems to me that unless the bad guys have poured through these emails, eliminating the ones that correspond (i.e. to / from) the one Hillary would have eliminated from her dump, then unless every, for example, Huma email that is from Hillary, and vice versa, is not reflected in the emails Hillary turned over ... then fraud is proven. In other words, there should be a one-to-one match of ‘To/From’ that can easily be performed for each of Hillary’s minions that had to turn over emails.
Any discrepancy will be very very easy to locate ... you could write a program in 2 hours to analyze this.
On the other hand, I can’t imagine the bad guys not knowing this ... i.e. consciously turning over a batch of emails that would potentially reveal this.
I have zero confidence even in the entire charade of what appears to be ‘investigating Hillary.’
The State Department is doing what it can to protect Hillary...and Obama.
I was about to post the same comment about paper vs electronic record with the metadata.
Making a big show over receiving paper copies gives the impression to the general public that a real investigation is going on.
Not true. This is another Potemkin Village scam by all concerned. Any supposed “investigator” who doesn’t point out the missing metadata is in my opinion as corrupt as everyone else.
Looky! An all-questions-answered, "final", completely scrubbed, scandal-excising release of "information".
Emails do not have page breaks.
The perps are printing the emails onto paper so they cannot be searched easily.
It would be much easier to deliver them electronically.
I bet they are printing formatting code too, to make the emails hard to read.
There is a name for this: Obstruction of Justice
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.