PS - You're a serial rapist.
So now the word “sinister” will be connected to this scandal. I still think on some level Bill wants to derail Hillary, so she doesn’t overshadow him.
And Bill Clinton knows sinister.
As Americans are supposed to believe Billy “Lewinskied” “Impeached” “Disbarred” Clinton!
Just your standard, everyday, ordinary graft.
"I did not have "foreign relations" with that pile of dirty cash..."
“trying to get wealthy people ... to spend their money wisely in a way that helps poor people”
Right, Bill, “poor people” like you and Shillary, who were “dead broke.” And now you’re worth over $100 million. It looks like your crime syndicate foundation has been a big success.
so bill bj clintoon would like YOU to believe that he and hillary, two crooks, are better able to spend money than the intelligent people who earned it inthe first place. So they willingly filter 90% to the clintoons and 10% to charity as opposed to 100% DIRECTLY to charity....
aLL THEY ARE DOING IS BUYING TWO high priced political WHORES...
YE BILL THERE IS A LOT SINISTER GOING ON.... when you and the hag sell out to foreign powers...
OH AND BILL WE DO REMEMBER THE SELL OUT TO CHINA ON NUKE SUBMARINE PROPELLER TECHNOLOGY AND THE SPACE SELLOUT WITH LORAL.... YES BILL YOU ARE A SCUMBAG.... and we do remember the 8 times you balked at taking out Bin Laden prior to 9/11.... Sinister is too nice a word for YOU AND THE HAG....pure EVIL is more like it...
"I did NOT have sinister relations with *that* country, any of them, not a single time... Never. Now, it's time for me to go back to the business of more relations with these countries, that the cronies have me do."
My information is circumstantial but mostly public knowledge. 1) Back in 2009, Intel started looking for State Dept employees to hire as advisers. 2) In 2009, Intel spent millions on a solar array in Oregon to help promote Green Energy in a State which gets little sunshine. 3) In 2010, a secret project starts up at Intel reporting to the US Gov and is NOT reported to Stockholders. It remains secret to this day.
"I don't think there's anything sinister in trying to get wealthy people in countries that are seriously involved in development to spend their money wisely in a way that helps poor people and lifts them up," Clinton told NBC News from Kenya, in an interview taped over the weekend.
Never mind that they likely would have said not much different about the Loral deal towards China. In addition, the Clinton family reputation would suggest that this deal is just as harmful as all the ones they stated as "harmless".
Canadian mining magnate Frank Giustra is one of
the Clinton Foundations largest donors. Giustra's
contributions go both directly to the foundation, and,
to a Canadian charity, which in turn sends money to the
Clinton Foundation.
DATA Sources: Clinton Foundation, CGEP (Canada) and Canadian tax records
Alberto Cuadra and Rosalind Helderman May 3 at 8:11 PM
ARTICLE LINK http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/wealthy-canadian-helps-fund-the-clinton-foundation/2015/05/03/f855ea22-f1ea-11e4- 90bc-afe06f530791_graphic.html
Like!
Oh yeah, I believe Slick Willy...... sure.
Yes... “to spend their money wisely” so that 15% ends up going to the charitable effort and the balance remains a slush fund, compensation and overhead benefiting the Clinton campaign staff and “executives” (including Bill, Hill and Chelsea!). That’s very thoughtful of these foreign donors and a great excuse for violating the law by not revealing their names and donation amounts over the past 4 years.
Imagine another 4-8 years of these people in charge!
Ma Clinton did say they were dead broke...
Not sinister. Just money-grubbing greed on a truly unique scale, Bill.
I'm sorry, what!? Billy boy, remind me again what the overhead rate is on the Clinton foundation money laundering scheme here? Just what percentage actually goes to charitable works? Don't even try to make it sound like this is for the benefit of "the poor." It is all about the benefit to the Clintons.
Yellow cake for foreign campaign contributions interfering with U.S. elections.
Well sinister’s meanings include:
adjective
1. threatening or portending evil, harm, or trouble; ominous
2. bad, evil, base, or wicked; fell
3. unfortunate; disastrous; unfavorable
4. of or on the left side; left.
5. Heraldry. noting the side of an escutcheon or achievement of arms that is to the left of the bearer
William Clinton probably has #5 in mind here and I would guess he is right these donation have nothing to do with heraldry. He could also have #3 in mind and certainly from his point of view they are not unfortunate, disastrous or unfavorable donation. So again he would be correct. Similarly, these donations are pay for play and thus not of the left as in definition #4.