This boot's fer you!
Posted on 04/22/2015 8:38:21 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd
Jeb Bush says that the prospective confirmation of attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch “sounds to me like a victory” because “getting rid of” current Attorney General Eric Holder has “gotta be a win.”
The former governor of Florida said last week that President Barack Obama deserves the opportunity to have the team he wants. He also took shots at Holder then, saying that Republicans should consider that the longer they take to confirm Lynch, the longer he will be in office.
“I said that they should have a vote,” Bush told radio show host Michael Medved in an interview Tuesday. “I think the president is deserving of a vote.”
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
He’s not even a smart tool.
Being perceived in his family as sharper than W is not a qualification to be president.
A win for the Dem’s and a loss to American’s and the nation. Jeb, how can you be so stupid? What is it they say- you can’t fix stupid.
If Jeb can’t SEE that LL is just a female version of EH he isn’t qualified to be dog catcher!
The old fixaroo is in, that’s for sure. L.L. skates.
“Reason Number 15,482 why Jeb is a tool.”
The correct answer is nominate somebody else, somebody worthy would be nice.
You go, Jeb-every time you speak publicly, you convince more undecideds to vote- for someone/ anyone else.
No wunder why the MSM luves him. He is the 2016 version of McCain.
If our scumbag Republican legislators had attached the anti-amnesty bill to her confirmation vote-—then we could have said “this has gotta be a win.”
Conservatives in this country, like Christians and Jews in the world at large, have been abandoned, turned upon, targeted for elimination.
And this M Effer claims he is a conservative? There ought to be suit filed against him for fraud.
As was getting rid of Mubarak, Qaddafi, the Shah, Battista, Chiang Kai-Shek, the Tsar, and Louis XVI...
IDIOT.
Nah, Jebster, what the GOP should do is pass a bill that says Lynchy is AG for life unless the senate can beat a 60 vote threshold and trigger a 2/3 majority of senators present vote to remove her from office.
That way they can really prove that they are not racist sexists, and that they are also pro-Latino (say it like you’re Spanish, right Jebster!?)
A**hole.
Good grief, how stupid is this fool?
Is JEB planning to run against hitlery on the demo rat ticket? Every time he opens his mouth, nothing but democrat talking points come out.
What a dummie! He should be an Iranian front line nuclear negotiator. He would fit right in.
Has it ever been a thought to him that maybe the GOP should not replace one radical with another but instead stand up for the Constitution and common sense?
Are they not the same?
Why not print up a bunch of this questionaire pass em around in your precinct. Encircle your answers and send it to your US Senator.
Dear Senator
INS...Amnesty.. Forget about Ebola
We don’t allow cattle to enter without a background health and ancestry check which we also reqiure of legal immigrants who wait years and still go thru health and record checks. We also require that any legal immingrant demonstrate prior to entry that they offer a contribution to our society and not dependency upon it .
The point being there is legislation enacted by congress that is supposed to be followed regulating immigration that any Presidential appointee is to follow who has been sworn to uphold and defend the constitution.
Yet we’re letting children and gang bangers in without doing any of this which has resulted in dispersing virulent new diseases (measles) and drug use which has resulted in unreported cases in schools where these illegal kids were placed.. Plus shoved a severe financial strain on local governments where they are placed .
Should any candidate for Attorney General supporting these practices be denied confirmation ?(Yes) (No) . Should the senate abandon the 60 vote majority for the “nuclear option” used by Reid when majority leader of the senate to any such candidate to be Attorney General supporting the above by applying the simple majority Reid rule. But citing the Hanen court injunction ruling that would restrict the use of the Reid rule only when such a ruling by a Judge were made ? (Yes) (No)
Should those given this bypassed favored treatment who miss their INS hearing be deported fortwith ? (Y) (N).. ? Denied re-entry (Y)(N) ? Snould that also apply to any illegal convicted of a felony (Y)(N)
In “countries where an American citizen decides to be a “legal” emigree never mind being a seasonal visitor still are denied voting privledges. Own land in their own name. Face steep fines before getting kicked out let alone denied income and energy subsistance including food stamps, or bring in family members .
I (do) (don’t) believe we should allow such full citizenship privledges mentioned above which are denied by the country of national origin of the above, to a legal American immigrant , deny such full citizen privledges to any (emigree) (seasonal vistor) (illegal) if their country does not allow those same privledges to any citizen of the United States, .
While such a position will be condemed as defacto deportation particularly by the political establishment .Would you continue to support a Senator who refuses to support such restrictions ? (Y) (N) Does that also include erecting border barriers such as fencing designed to discourage surrepticious or uncontolled entry ? (Yes) (No)
Should any American citizen which goes overseas to join a foreign entity fighting against the United States (such as ISIS) Be denied re-entry (Y)(N) and their citizenship revoked? (Y) (N) Should that person be charged with treason (Y)(N)
Very Truly Yours For Restoring the value of American citizenship, our Constitution, and Conservative Government
Include your return address label below along with your signature and date
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.