Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scott Walker called ethanol mandate 'central planning' and a 'big government mandate' - before Iowa
Washington Examiner ^ | MARCH 9, 2015 | TIMOTHY P. CARNEY

Posted on 03/09/2015 9:19:05 AM PDT by SoConPubbie

Scott Walker went to Iowa over the weekend and embraced the ethanol mandate — a corporate welfare program that subsidizes corn farmers and ethanol producers at the expense of drivers, eaters, restaurants, and the environment.

As my colleague Phil Klein aptly put it, "if Scott Walker can't stand up to Iowans, how will he stand up to the Islamic State?"

Why do I assume this position was tailored to Iowa's caucus goers? Because Walker vehemently opposed the ethanol mandate back in 2006, actually standing out from the rest of Wisconsin's gubernatorial field in that regard.

From Milwaukee's Daily Reporter at the time:

"Currently, we have a problem with big government inMadison. On principle, I cannot support this proposal.

"It is clearto me that a big government mandate is not the way to support the farmers of thisstate," he continued. "Central planning will not help our family farmers,protect our environment or provide jobs. The free-enterprise system must driveinnovation to relieve our dependence on foreign oil, not mandates from the stateor federal government."

I've reached out to Walker's people for comment. I'll update when they respond.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Iowa; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016election; agitprop; astroturf; election2016; ethanol; freestuff; ntsa; scottwalker; walker; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last
"If we must have an enemy at the head of Government, let it be one whom we can oppose, and for whom we are not responsible, who will not involve our party in the disgrace of his foolish and bad measures." - Alexander Hamilton
 
"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party over to the traitors in the battle just ended. We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support. Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates wouldn’t make any sense at all." -- President Ronald Reagan
 
"A thing moderately good is not so good as it ought to be. Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." - Thomas Paine 1792
 
"It does not take a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams
 
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen." - Samuel Adams
 

1 posted on 03/09/2015 9:19:05 AM PDT by SoConPubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
Title shortened due to FreeRepublic's Posting Rules:

Actual Title:

Scott Walker called ethanol mandate 'central planning' and a 'big government mandate' --- before he was courting Iowa
2 posted on 03/09/2015 9:19:48 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

First rule of civilization:

DO NOT BURN YOUR FOOD!...................


3 posted on 03/09/2015 9:20:35 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

We are going to end up destroying each other and Jebbie will win the nomination.


4 posted on 03/09/2015 9:23:29 AM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Finally! A candidate with pair.

No more pander bears!


5 posted on 03/09/2015 9:24:40 AM PDT by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
RE :”Scott Walker called ethanol mandate ‘central planning’ and a ‘big government mandate’ -— before he was courting Iowa “

He's killing Cruz in Iowa polls, Go Walker!

6 posted on 03/09/2015 9:25:49 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I can recall the 1970s when ethanol was touted as an “extending additive” to gasoline so that our local supplies weren’t over-demanded. There was no consideration, under JimmahCahrtahr regarding the so-called oxygenting properties of EtOH.

Sheep...meet your ethanol wolves.


7 posted on 03/09/2015 9:26:50 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Every cloud has a silver lining: The ethanol mandate is finally getting the kind of attention it deserves.


8 posted on 03/09/2015 9:26:58 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
Finally! A candidate with pair.

No more pander bears!


This was Scott Walker 2006.

Scott Walker 2015 just pandered to the Iowans and changed his position.

Apparently, between 2006 and now, he lost that pair!
9 posted on 03/09/2015 9:27:08 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

It should be noted that Walker did call for a phase out of ethanol during his speech in Iowa.


10 posted on 03/09/2015 9:27:11 AM PDT by Thunder90 (All posts soley represent my own opinion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

As my colleague Phil Klein aptly put it, “if Scott Walker can’t stand up to Iowans, how will he stand up to the Islamic State?”


Answer is easy: He doesn’t need the Islamic states votes.


11 posted on 03/09/2015 9:27:59 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

So called Iowa Conservatives are very happy to suck at the government ag teat. This will not play well there or in the midwest.

He is right, of course. It is government planning and crony capitalism that costs us money multiple ways.


12 posted on 03/09/2015 9:28:10 AM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion ( "Forward lies the crown, and onward is the goal.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

I like this guy. If he survives to the Georgia Primary, he has my vote.


13 posted on 03/09/2015 9:29:48 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Stretching you gasoline supplies with ethanol is like stretching your ground beef supplies with Filet Mignon.............


14 posted on 03/09/2015 9:30:47 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sickoflibs

Never mind that he’s wrong on ethanol and Cruz is right.

Never mind that he’s ‘evolving’ on immigration and Cruz is right.

Never mind that he has significant issues on abortion and Cruz is right.

Walker is decent. We can do much better. Cruz or lose.


15 posted on 03/09/2015 9:31:10 AM PDT by Colonel_Flagg (You're either in or in the way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
I like this guy. If he survives to the Georgia Primary, he has my vote.

Sadly, that 'guy' was Scott Walker in 2006. Apparently, that 'guy' no longer exists as the current Scott Walker (2015) just changed his tune and now supports the Corn Subsidy.
16 posted on 03/09/2015 9:31:44 AM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
New and improved etch-a-sketch
17 posted on 03/09/2015 9:34:44 AM PDT by gwgn02
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Agreed, but we ^must not^ ignore the history of EtOH in the US gasoline industry.
It was introduced under Carter as an “extender”; to stretch our reserves.

Today it is an “oxygenator” (a very dubious assignment) that reduces pollution. According to my BS.Chem. it can’t really be both without political interference (AKA: an alteration of scientific terms).


18 posted on 03/09/2015 9:38:25 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations: The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel

Oxygenator? What is that? It would be cheaper to use this..................

19 posted on 03/09/2015 9:41:37 AM PDT by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie

Walker walks.


20 posted on 03/09/2015 9:42:15 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-127 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson