Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why a Fake Article Titled "Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?" was Accepted by 17 Medical Journals
Fast Company ^ | January 27, 2015 | 11:20 AM | Elizabeth Segran

Posted on 01/27/2015 10:08:37 AM PST by Cooter

WHY A FAKE ARTICLE TITLED "CUCKOO FOR COCOA PUFFS?" WAS ACCEPTED BY 17 MEDICAL JOURNALS

A HARVARD SCIENTIST WANTED TO SEE EXACTLY HOW EASY IT IS TO GET MEDICAL RESEARCH PUBLISHED. IN SOME CASES, $500 IS PRETTY MUCH ALL IT TAKES.

BY ELIZABETH SEGRAN

As a medical researcher at Harvard, Mark Shrime gets a very special kind of spam in his inbox: every day, he receives at least one request from an open-access medical journal promising to publish his research if he would only pay $500.

"You block one of them with your spam filter and immediately another one pops up," Shrime, an MD who is pursuing a PhD in health policy, tells me.

These emails are annoying, for sure, but Shrime was worried that there might be bigger issues at stake: What exactly are these journals publishing and who is taking these journals to be credible sources of medical information?

Shrime decided to see how easy it would be to publish an article. So he made one up. Like, he literally made one up. He did it using www.randomtextgenerator.com. The article is entitled "Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?" and its authors are the venerable Pinkerton A. LeBrain and Orson Welles. The subtitle reads: "The surgical and neoplastic role of cacao extract in breakfast cereals." Shrime submitted it to 37 journals over two weeks and, so far, 17 of them have accepted it. (They have not "published" it, but say they will as soon as Shrime pays the $500. This is often referred to as a "processing fee." Shrime has no plans to pay them.) Several have already typeset it and given him reviews, as you can see at the end of this article. One publication says his methods are "novel and innovative"!. But when Shrime looked up the physical locations of these publications, he discovered that many had very suspicious addresses; one was actually inside a strip club.

Many of these publications sound legitimate. To someone who is not well-versed in a particular subfield of medicine—a journalist, for instance—it would be easy to mistake them for valid sources. "As scientists, we’re aware of the top-tier journals in our specific sub-field, but even we cannot always pinpoint if a journal in another field is real or not," Shrime says. "For instance, the International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is the very first journal I was ever published in and it’s legitimate. But the Global Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology is fake. Only someone in my field would know that."

What angers Shrime more than anything is that fake journals seem to target doctors and researchers in developing countries for whom $500 is an enormous sum of money. "When you dig into these publications, it’s clear that the vast majority of authors on their table of contents come from lower-income countries," he says. "They’re preying on people who aren’t able to get into the mainstream medical journals because they come from a university that nobody recognizes or they have some other scientific disadvantage."

There is a government agency, the National Library of Medicine, that creates an official list of approved medical journals called PubMed. However, Shrime says, it can sometimes take a while for publications to be indexed. Eighteen months ago, The Lancet, one of the most respected medical journals in the world, launched several new publications like The Lancet Respiratory Medicine and The Lancet Global Health; they have only just been included in PubMed.

"If you want to find a reputable journal, you’d turn to PubMed, but the problem is that there are also many reputable journals that are not on PubMed," Shrime says. He often turns to Google Scholar in his research because it includes a wider range of publications, but he’s found the service also indexes many of the same bogus journals that accepted his Cocoa Puffs paper. (I made several attempts to reach the journals that accepted Shrime's fake article, but none replied to my queries.)

If Harvard-trained researchers are sometimes not able to spot a real journal from a fake, what chance do the rest of us have? Journalists, for instance, often cite medical research in their articles without the expertise to know whether their source is credible or not. The good news is that there are tools available to navigate the process. Jeffrey Beall, an academic librarian, has compiled a list of predatory publishers that he updates every year. Shrime recommends that people who cite medical research cross-reference journals with this list, but keep in mind that brand-new predatory journals pop up every day and Beall may not have found them yet.

So, the next time you read an article that references a new weight loss study or cutting-edge research about dieting, it’s worth taking it with a grain of salt. It may very well be legitimate, but it might also be quack science. Or entirely made up.

"If the source is not on PubMed or on Beall’s list, the only real way to tell would be to speak to the leading scholar in that field," says Shrime. "And who has the time to do that?"


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Makes one wonder what other "research" was published.
1 posted on 01/27/2015 10:08:37 AM PST by Cooter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cooter
There is a finite chance that a text generator could come up with the next medical breakthrough.

OK, OK, it's a kinda small chance. But it's a chance.

2 posted on 01/27/2015 10:11:39 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter

Well, now we know how all that Globull Warming research gets published....................


3 posted on 01/27/2015 10:11:53 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter
Harvard is NOT what it once was.....

It's a Museum in Toontown....


4 posted on 01/27/2015 10:12:27 AM PST by hosepipe (" This propaganda has been edited (specifically) to include some fully orbed hyperbole.. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill; Cooter
he discovered that many had very suspicious addresses; one was actually inside a strip club.

I've done a whole lot of research in those places!...................

5 posted on 01/27/2015 10:13:05 AM PST by Red Badger (If you compromise with evil, you just get more evil..........................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cooter

Damnit! I should have known it was too good to be true. I thought that medical journal was enlightened enough to see the genius of my article about using a topical application of goose crap to cure pimples. So, they just wanted the five hundred bucks. I hope they get a big zit right before the prom.


6 posted on 01/27/2015 10:16:00 AM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter
The science is settled...


7 posted on 01/27/2015 10:16:18 AM PST by Rodamala
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter
The article is entitled "Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?" and its authors are the venerable Pinkerton A. LeBrain and Orson Welles.

Pinky and the Brain, eh?

"What shall we do tonight, Brain?"

"Same thing we do every night. Write fake academic papers and get them published!"

8 posted on 01/27/2015 10:21:59 AM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter

Academics can’t be bothered to check things.

They’ve been punked before, too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sokal_affair

The bogus paper: http://www.physics.nyu.edu/sokal/transgress_v2/transgress_v2_singlefile.html

The postmodern essay generator (read disclaimer at bottom): http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/


9 posted on 01/27/2015 10:23:14 AM PST by Disambiguator (Je suis ein Berliner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodamala

I’m sure they had to stop that because it was “insensitive to the mentally ill”.


10 posted on 01/27/2015 10:23:23 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cooter

For a moment I thought we were reading about the BLS or the Commerce Department.


11 posted on 01/27/2015 10:26:55 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter

Great post! So much on FR is about BS like this from people who want us to think they know anything, but are just opinion whores.


12 posted on 01/27/2015 10:27:12 AM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter

Bear this in mind the next time Brian Williams says, “a new study confirms that . . .”


13 posted on 01/27/2015 10:31:13 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter

Well, now we know how easy it is to be grubered. Global warming, Obamacare, Benghazi, etc.

All from the “experts.”


14 posted on 01/27/2015 10:31:18 AM PST by ForYourChildren (Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - a Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
"Ford!" he said, "there's an infinite number of monkeys outside who want to talk to us about this script for Hamlet they've worked out."

15 posted on 01/27/2015 10:31:29 AM PST by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cooter
Shrime decided to see how easy it would be to publish an article. So he made one up. Like, he literally made one up. He did it using www.randomtextgenerator.com. The article is entitled "Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs?" and its authors are the venerable Pinkerton A. LeBrain and Orson Welles. The subtitle reads: "The surgical and neoplastic role of cacao extract in breakfast cereals." Shrime submitted it to 37 journals over two weeks and, so far, 17 of them have accepted it. (They have not "published" it, but say they will as soon as Shrime pays the $500. This is often referred to as a "processing fee." Shrime has no plans to pay them.)

Okay, that made me laugh!


16 posted on 01/27/2015 10:32:12 AM PST by Alex Murphy ("the defacto Leader of the FR Calvinist Protestant Brigades")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter
But when Shrime looked up the physical locations of these publications, he discovered that many had very suspicious addresses; one was actually inside a strip club.

So the Bada Bing is getting into publishing medical research papers!

I can somehow picture this...


17 posted on 01/27/2015 10:38:51 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

Ah Say Ah Say


18 posted on 01/27/2015 10:40:11 AM PST by shineon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cooter; Slings and Arrows; wagglebee

If they will publish that Homosexuality is not a Mental Disorder, then yeah.

I can totally see how they would accept “Cuckoo for Coca Puffs”


19 posted on 01/27/2015 10:40:42 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (See Ya On The Road; Al Baby's Mom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cooter
I've said it for a long time:

Evolution and Global Warming are more alike than you might think.

The papers that support Evolution are peer-reviewed.
The papers that oppose Evolution are refused for peer review.

And does it matter? It's all politics and money.

20 posted on 01/27/2015 10:40:55 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (Malort, turning taste-buds into taste-foes for generations.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson