Dear Mormon Chicks: Why Don’t You Stop Boycotting Carl’s Jr.’s And Boycott Islam?

Last week onClashDaily.comwe ran a story about Mormon twin sisters who founded “Beauty Redefined”, who are calling on folks to boycott Carl's Jr.’s hamburger joint because they run adverts with hot models. According to the religious twins, these ads, “objectify women”; and I guess, by that inference, girls everywhere, because of the ads, will start to feel badly about themselves, adopt some eating disorder and/or get ocean-buoy-sized breast implants in order to look like Kate Upton. Or something to that effect.

Now, before I go on, here’s an FYI for forlorn ladies wanting to look like Kate after watching a Carl's Jr.’s commercial: try as you might you probably will never look like Miss Upton because that bombshell hit the genetic lotto. Don’t even try. It’ll cost too much money and you’ll end up looking like Mickey Rourke with butt implants and bogus hooters.

Look sisters … Carl’s is known for having beautiful models’ molesting their burgers. It’s their shtick and they’re upfront about it stating, “We believe in putting hot models in our commercials, because ugly ones don’t sell burgers.”

Truth be told, it’s pretty much everybody and their dogs’ shtick who are trying to hawk anything to anyone nowadays. Please note that most of the models that sell stuff to us via TV, print or Internet don’t look like an unshorn and distended Rosie O’Donnell. Lesbian cruises don’t even use models that look like Rosie for their marketing purposes because they know that brain fart would spawn crap results.

Earth to Matilda: Ads are supposed to make us feel bad about ourselves. They’re supposed to make us feel fat, ugly, stupid, lazy, driving the wrong car, using the wrong computer, having gross/frizzy hair, drinking the wrong vodka and/or using the incorrect herpes medicine. For God’s sake relax… its called Marketing 101, it’s been around since the Garden of Eden.

If you want to throw stones then toss some at one of your own like Marie Osmond. She’s using her newfound sexy, fifty-pound, weight dump to pimp the snot out of Nutri-System. Marie … you never looked better.

Speaking of Mormons, if you truly want to jackhammer a group of abusers that’re destroying a women’s worth, then why don’t you turn your #hashtag temper against the “Fundamentalist Church Of The Latter Day Saints“? That cult systematically enslaves and abuses teenage chicks on a 24/7/365 basis. Listen, if you want to get pissy then get pissy at them because they’re straight up gross on ‘roids.

BTW, you do know what fundamental stands for don’t you? It stands for no fun, mostly dumb and quite mental.

Honestly, I hate to pick on you twins because you seem like decent dames that don’t buy into this stercore tauri -laden culture. However, girls … of all the things that are wrong with this planet you two decide to protest a fast food chain? What are you, gay? Good Lawd, sistas … you’re out in leftfield. On a cosmic scale of things, what Carl’s, in your opinion, is doing to women, is incredibly inconsequential compared to the insanely abusive stain on the planet known as Islam.

If you’d like to launch into some #hasthtag-rage-boycott-campaign against a gaggle of jacked up and violent bastards that genuinely abuse women, then why don’t you fly the social media middle finger to Islam? They abuse women more than any other group on the planet, bar none. They make Carl's Jr.’s look like NOW radicals. If you don’t believe me, just Google: female circumcision, honor killings, child brides, Sharia Law, wife beatings, 1400 sexual molestations of children in Rotherdam, UK, the beheading of women and children by ISIS, Boko Haram. And tell me what religion has spawned these atrocities. Why don’t you #hashtag them?

Personally, I thank God we live in a country where gorgeous women are celebrated, allowed to wear bikinis on TV while they wash an old Camaro with one hand and they inhale a hamburger (if they chose to do so) with the other hand and they don’t have to hide every square inch of their body except a tiny slit for their eyes because some bass-akward-goat-lover from Suckistan believes that slavish garb pleases his make-believe sky-god and his pedophile prophet.

If you and other ladies really care about the “plight of women”, then why don’t you #hashtag attack Islam and their demonic Sharia Law which treats women like cow crap from the cradle to the grave? Use your youth and zeal to attack a true enemy of women because everywhere the Islamic weed is allowed to take root women have faced brutalities.

Did I say anything about polygamy being the cause of the MO mobs?

Missouri opposition was based on bloc voting and paranoia due, at least partly, to Mormons preaching about how they would soon take over the property of the gentiles, that they would be exterminated, etc.

IOW, Missourians opposition was based on much the same reaction as has occurred in more recent communities when “weird” cults start moving into an area in large numbers. See the Rajneeshis and the Church Universal and Triumphant.

Here’s a quote from a sermon preached by Sidney Rigdon in July 1838. It was well tailored to reduce tensions. /s

“And that mob that comes on us to disturb us, it shall be between us and them a war of extermination; for we will follow them until the last drop of their blood is spilled; or else they will have to exterminate us, for we will carry the seat of war to their own houses and their own families, and one party or the other shall be utterly destroyed...”

Joseph Smith, wisely (that’s also sarcasm) chose to print this speech as a pamphlet and distribute it widely.

The famous extermination order of Boggs was issued in October, fairly obviously with wording influenced by Mormon threat. But Mormons make much of Boggs’ order and generally ignore the rhetoric leading up to it. It is also relevant that, AFIK, not a single Mormon was actually killed as a result of the Extermination Order.

As a private practice, polygamy started sometime around 1831. Rumors immediately started to fly, as the 1835 version of Documents and Covenants shows, since it denied that it was a Mormon practice. This was, of course, a lie. So there were certainly beliefs, accurate as it turned out, among Missourians of the time that Mormons were secretly practicing polygamy.

Mormon leadership of the time also had a real problem with tolerating dissent and apostasy. They’d take illegal action against dissenters and disgruntled members, who of course were more than happy to stir up neighboring gentiles with “revelations” about secret practices, some being true and some false. But of course the gentiles had no way of knowing which were which.

There were quite a number of weird religious cults running around the American west at the time. None precipitated major persecution or warfare other than the Mormons, who did so repeatedly, in OH, several times in MO, in IL, and in UT, again several times.

I grew up in the area of the Missouri Mormon War and have been to a number of the battlefield sites. It is at least arguable that the Mormons made a habit of talking big, pissing people off, and starting wars they were never able to finish.

There was plenty of fault to go around, and I make no excuses for Boggs or the other mob leaders, but the Mormons have made a practice of obscuring their own complicity in what happened and exaggerating their losses.

For example, it is entirely possible that fewer Mormons died in all the mob attacks combined, with some of those deaths being in combat rather than plain murders, than Mormons slaughtered in a single attack on gentiles in 1857. And of course that attack intentionally murdered men, women and children who had surrendered on promise of having their lives spares. It remains the worst single atrocity committed by white Americans on white Americans in our entire history.

My beef with the Mormon portrayal of this period is that they often compare their persecution, implicitly at least, with that suffered by the early Christians. This is, to my mind, a slander on the early Christians. Mormons, unlike them, bear considerable responsibility for provoking the attacks of their persecutors.

The attacks on the Mormons, BTW, were part of an overall breakdown of law on the frontier, as addressed by a very young Lincoln in January, 1838. People in the midwest had gotten into the habit of taking direct “democratic” action rather than using the law.

http://www.abrahamlincolnonline.org/lincoln/speeches/lyceum.htm

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.