New York Times Had Reporter 'Talking to the Attackers' During Benghazi Massacre

Breitbart.com/Big-Journalism ^ | 12-31-2013 | Tony Lee

[servo1969]

The New York Times had a reporter talking to attackers on the ground during the Benghazi attacks that killed four Americans in September of 2012, including U.S. Ambassador Chris Stevens, and may know the identity of some the murderers and perpetrators.

David Kirkpatrick, the Times reporter who wrote the story that forced the paper's Editorial page editor to defensively declare on Monday that it has not chosen to endorse Hillary Clinton for president in 2016, said that the paper had a reporter on the ground who was witnessing the attacks.

[1010RD]

So that’s how they knew it was a spontaneous riot due to the contents of an obscure YouTube video. They say the NYT is the paper of record. Smart.

[BlessedBeGod]

B-damned-freaking-S

[easternsky]

I am just wondering, do they really think we are this stupid, just sending this crap out day after day. it just doesn’t end. It is like waiting for the daily newspaper to be dropped off everyday so you can read the comic strip, like Dick Tracy and Blondie

[Rodamala]

Did it really take them this long to create the right story about the attack?

They had a reelection to push through first.

[Rodamala]

It is like waiting for the daily newspaper to be dropped off everyday so you can read the comic strip, like Dick Tracy and Blondie.

more like Doonesbury with the slimes.

[Deagle]

My point exactly - nothing like an agenda to push the written word! The Times does it best though...

[St_Thomas_Aquinas]

-— President Obama will soon get to the bottom of this..... -—

C’mon. He’s focusing like a laser on jobs.

[DoughtyOne]

Damn good question!

[WhistlingPastTheGraveyard]

The video itself is highly suspect. As is the martyrdom of Nakoula, the filmmaker.

[Cyman]

Most probably it was that the reporter and terrorist al Quaedan were one and the same.

[Squat]

Obama, a known Bears fan, releases gay info on Rodgers after Bears loss to Packers. I just put it out there as to why the prez knows sooo much and yet knows so little.

[Steven Tyler]

When did Dan Rather start working for the NYT

[Eleutheria5]

I know it’s true. It says so on Breitbart.

[C210N]

The Slimes would be more trustworthy if they claimed this “reporter” orchestrated the Video, that while Nikoula was the director and Kirkpatrick, on behalf of the times, was the screen-writer/producer.

[smalltownslick]

How could they have known there was going to be an attack, and to have a reporter there?

[ArmstedFragg]

Yep. They’re going after Gennifer Flowers again too.

[DagnyTaggar]

Talking? Probably more like coordinating...

[livius]

Actually, the Times boasted earlier that it had not one but two “reporters” there, both of them young Muslim males who had previously been “waging jihad” with some local group but decided that they should devote themselves instead to “helping” the foreign press to “understand” what was happening. Neither one of them was a journalist in any sense of the term, but they apparently became the Times’ source for everything. This, of course, was because they came up with the pro-jihadist version that the Times wanted to hear.

[Sir Napsalot]

Money to donuts that their readers and coastie pundits (targeted audience) ate it all up.

/didn’t want to read the comments on the Slime