[smoothsailing]

"Some visits by top officials are never even noted in the visitors logs."

[rktman]

STOP! My sides are killing me from laughing.

[FlingWingFlyer]

So in other words, the kids now running the White Hut haven’t got a clue who the hell is coming and going there?

[oh8eleven]

Visitor logs too unreliable to reveal whether Shulman visited 157 times.
Didn't OJ Clinton's secretary pull some krap with the WH logs to make Lewinsky's visits disappear?

[Travis McGee]

[txnativegop]

How utterly lame! Obama really expects people to believe this BS?

[BookmanTheJanitor]

And, yet, the IRS constantly demands detailed logs/books from the people they audit...

[Sacajaweau]

WH: So that would nean he could have been there more than 157 times.

Man..are you guys stupid or what

[Venturer]

The White House-—one of the most secure buildings in the world. Guards everywhere.

And we are supposed to believe they cannot keep an accurate long book.

If the log book isn’t accurate why do they keep one at all?
Why do they hire people who cannot keep a logbook?

This is another Lie that we are supposed to believe.
If the log book is inaccurate I say it is because they don’t want it to be accurate.

[txrefugee]

Maybe Shulman was meeting with the president of the SEIU, who also had over a hundred visits to the Oval Office.

No wonder The Worst President doesn’t know anything about anything, He doesn’t meet with visitors to his office.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Sounds like it was MORE (certainly not less). And probably about more things that Democrats care about, than Easter Eggs.

[Mr. K]

So they put down instances when he was there, when he wasn't?

I would think it possible the other way around (forgetting to note he was there when he was) but not to make up who was there when he was not, but... waitaminnit.... Is this satire??

(its so hard to tell anymore)

[morphing libertarian]

The most common error on logs would be omitting someone who actually came in. If he was recorded 157 times, it is probably a few more. But nobody is going to pick the IRS commissioner and record extra visits.

[knarf]

It taps out to about once a week.

[KarlInOhio]

When I worked for a defense contractor we had to sign into any secure location we went. Sure, sometimes we would have our clearance information forwarded and then not show up if a meeting was canceled or if we didn't now who would attend so just sent all the potential visitors' info, but that never changed the need to actually sign on the visitors' log when we showed up.

I expect that the White House would be much, much more strict that the defense locations I went to, so I call BS on this whole thing. About the only possibility is people getting special access without signing in the log, but that means 157 would be the minimum number of times Shulman went to the White House.

[mom.mom]

This is getting really stupid.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

TRANSLATION: “He visited a lot more than 157 times.”

[Toespi]

The next one will be.....the WH knows at least 157 different Douglas Shulmans.

[GotMojo]

Hey IRS, I’m not sure I actually earned that income. Can I get a refund? You know I meant to earn the income (I was pre-cleared), but I’m not sure I actually earned it. Give me my money back......

[elpadre]

hummm! are they suggesting one cannot trust the Secret Service documents??

[Jack Deth]

I’m confused.

Aren’t sign in and guest logs admissible in courts of laws to establish alibis. Or used as exhibits to establish guide and time lines in either prosecution or defense?

And wouldn’t there be a receptionist of sorts to monitor said logs? Especially at such a fine, tax funded establishment as the White House?

Keep up the hearing and investigations. Soon there will be so many small fires blazing the White House will trip over itself with the size, number and enormity of their flat out silly lies!