To: smoothsailing
STOP! My sides are killing me from laughing.
2 posted on
06/01/2013 8:47:27 AM PDT by
rktman
(BACKGROUND CHECKS? YOU FIRST mr. president(not that we'd get the truth!))
To: rktman
Yea, right....
7 posted on
06/01/2013 8:49:35 AM PDT by
darkwing104
(Let's get dangerous)
To: rktman
'Some visits by top officials are never even noted in the visitors logs. A comparison of the situation room photo from the night of the bin Laden raid May 1, 2011 to the visitor logs, for example, shows that several of the officials in the photo never appear in the public access records."
To: rktman
Right. There I’d NO RECORD of who attended meetings at the White Hut.
37 posted on
06/01/2013 9:13:32 AM PDT by
Kozak
(The Republic is dead. I do not owe what we have any loyalty, wealth or sympathy.)
To: rktman
LOL!!! Then what good, might I ask, are these supposed record of visits logs??? More Obama BS!!! Obama...criminal in the White House!!!
49 posted on
06/01/2013 9:34:39 AM PDT by
JLAGRAYFOX
( My only objective is to defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
To: rktman
Then it must also be unreliable how many times Billy the Bomber and Calypso Louie visited as well...
57 posted on
06/01/2013 9:43:21 AM PDT by
Hotlanta Mike
("Governing a great nation is like cooking a small fish - too much handling will spoil it." Lao Tzu)
To: rktman
Ok, I’ll give them 10% for sloppiness. Let’s say it was between 141 and 173 times. Allowing for the least incriminating number, they need to explain why he was there 141 times.
62 posted on
06/01/2013 9:58:25 AM PDT by
generally
(Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
To: rktman
"White House defense: Visitor logs too unreliable to reveal whether Shulman visited 157 times..." YES! EGGSACTLY BATMAN!
I mean it might instead be 158 or maybe 156 visits...!
96 posted on
06/01/2013 4:44:58 PM PDT by
Mad Dawgg
(If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson