Posted on 05/21/2013 1:01:08 AM PDT by Pharmboy
More whistleblowers will emerge shortly in the escalating Benghazi scandal, according to two former U.S. diplomats who spoke with PJ Media Monday afternoon.
These whistleblowers, colleagues of the former diplomats, are currently securing legal counsel because they work in areas not fully protected by the Whistleblower law.
According to the diplomats, what these whistleblowers will say will be at least as explosive as what we have already learned about the scandal, including details about what really transpired in Benghazi that are potentially devastating to both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
snip...
Stevens mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA. Such a mission would usually be a CIA effort, but the intelligence agency had opposed the idea because of the high risk involved in arming insurgents with powerful weapons that endanger civilian aircraft.
Hillary Clinton still wanted to proceed because, in part, as one of the diplomats said, she wanted to overthrow Gaddafi on the cheap.
This left Stevens in the position of having to clean up the scandalous enterprise when it became clear that the insurgents actually were al-Qaeda indeed, in the view of one of the diplomats, the same group that attacked the consulate and ended up killing Stevens.
snip... likened it to the Mike Nichols film Charlie Wilsons War about a clueless congressman who supplies Stingers to the Afghan guerrillas. Its as if Hillary and the others just watched that movie and said Hey, lets do that! the diplomat said.
He added that he and his colleagues think the leaking of General David Petraeus affair with his biographer Paula Broadwell was timed to silence the former CIA chief on these matters.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Wow, that is intriguing. I'm trying to wrap my head around any scenario that Hillary could use to come out "clean". On the surface it seems to be no-win, but knowing the Clinton's, they can do about anything and make low-information voters believe them.
Of note here is how many of the 96% of blacks who voted for O will in turn vote for Hillary after she threw their messiah under the bus? She can't win without them. Intriguing, indeed.
******They are going to uncover facts pointing to zero actively aiding and abetting al queda...*******
Heard there was a separate CIA division just for the State Dept ?
Don’t know if that is true or not....
Good catch.....whatever it is..it’s big.
Good point.
“Stevens mission in Benghazi, they will say, was to buy back Stinger missiles from al-Qaeda groups issued to them by the State Department, not by the CIA.”
BINGO!
Many here (me included) have pointed out that MANPADS had to be the reason no air-cover was allowed.
We risked being shot down by the anti-aircraft missiles 0bama gave to Al Qaeda.
Next up: Al Qaeda shoots down American commercial aircraft with the missiles 0bama gave them.
Arming the enemy is easily understood:
TREASON!
Nothing will happen because the press could care less. That means the American sheeple could care less.
The Dear Leader surely appreciates the demoralization from the right while the left concentrates on demonization and distraction
Problem is, one of their first practice shoot-downs was one of Putin’s. Now he’s after their ass.
They know that, which is why they want to disarm us. They weren’t buying back those arms because they made a mistake; they just didn’t want to get caught.
That's right. It's called a limited hangout. They admit to a much lesser charge to protect the much larger scandal. Like how Clinton was impeach for lying about sex in a lawsuit, which involved only himself and wasn't much of a crime, instead of being impeached for selling nuclear missile secrets to the Red Chinese, which involved a lot of powerful people and is treason and punishable by death.
The Libya/Syria take down isn't something Obama and Hillary have done on their own. This has been a long term policy involving lots of other major powers - the French, the British, the Israelis, and the Globalist Banksters. They aren't all secret Muslims. In fact the higher ups will throw Obama and Hillary under the bus to protect the Great Game. Just like they might throw Obama under the bus to protect the IRS and the private, for profit corporation it collects money for, the Federal Reserve.
“The former diplomat ... regarded the whole enterprise as totally amateurish and likened it to the Mike Nichols film Charlie Wilsons War about a clueless congressman...”
I do hope that there is something to this. But that comment there tells me the ‘former diplomat’ is an idiot. Charlie Wilson was one of the few people in the US governement who really understood what was going on in Afghanistan.
lol! Good point. That near miss in Syria of an Aeroflot (or some such) was 0bambi’s missile in Al Qaeda’s hands.
Ha!
Puti is particularly unwilling to let go of that. That will cost the Administration billions of dollars in payoff (look for it) or the downfall of 0bambi.
What great payback.
The Dems view these guys as kindred spirits. They’re Freedom Fighters in their eyes.
Ain’t it? Unlike how we used to be, Putin’s bite is much worse than his bark, in fact I don’t think you even get a bark with Putin.
Unlikely allies.... I cheer when he does the right thing, which he does more and more often.
And probably Putin’s first command when getting into help recover the manpads was ‘and get that stupid bitch out of the way first.’
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.